It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yeah, I misread that part. Doesn't change the fact that tradition isn't a valid reason to deny gays equal rights.
Originally posted by goos3
Originally posted by technical difficulties
By your logic, infertile couples and old people shouldn't be allowed to get married, as well as people who aren't planning on having kids anytime soon. As for procreation, people can adopt and get a surrograte mother, or even get artifically inseminated. Your argument is nothing more than a argument from tradition, which is by no means a logical argument.
Originally posted by Zanti Misfit
reply to post by technical difficulties
Yes , it dosen't make Sense . The Traditional Definition of Marriage is between a Man and a Woman with the Possibility of Procreating another Human Being .To try and Redefine it is just a Selfish Act of Desperation by those who cannot except the Status Quo . Unions between Same Sex Partners will just have to be Defined in Another way , it's as Simple as that ...........
He said "with a possibility".
What do you not get?
OH OH i get it, your one of them.
Originally posted by akushla99
Seriously...NO
All the utter tripe about continuation of the species and the garbage about what this church and that church says, is complete and absolute vilification veiled in false authority. Just more of the same guff peddled by closed minded sheep that bleat tradition, and right and wrong, and natural...as if these have been decreed by some moral authority as absolute...
Get a life, idiots. Think for yourself, wake up!
Cheers
Originally posted by akushla99
reply to post by goos3
Ouch! That really hurt.
NOT!
Get a brain! God gave you one to think with!
Cheers
Originally posted by jerryznv
I have to look at history to understand if it is wrong or not and decide where in history it was decided that a man should not lay with a man, or a woman with a woman. I come up with creation and The Garden of Eden, I can't find any documents older than this that say it's wrong, so I think I will stick with the original plan. Where and when did somebody decide that that was just a stupid rule and that it needed to be changed? How long ago was that put down in the history book?
I think if a person wants to marry their gay partner, or whatever the correct term is for their signifigant other, then more power to them...the question seems to be whether it should be recognized (by who?) and for what reason.
I won't recognize it as a marrige, but then who gives two cents about what I recognize. I will recognize it as what I believe it is...simply wrong from the begining, and still is.
Originally posted by goos3
Originally posted by akushla99
reply to post by goos3
God did give me a brain, and my brain tells me.
Being gay is wrong in all aspects.
I mean if you want to be gay that's on your own terms.
Don't push that on the rest of us.
Just for the record, my friend, if you work things out in Your brain, the way you have alleged that i am pushing anything...i rest my case...you are arguing with yourself.
My brain tells me that christ said...Do unto others as you would be done by...prepared for this?!
Cheers
Originally posted by goos3
Originally posted by akushla99
reply to post by goos3
PS it's funny how you say think for myself, but you say cheers just because everyone else does.
my sheeple radar is going HAYWIRE.edit on 21-5-2011 by goos3 because: (no reason given)
Noted!
In future i will not be so civil with you!
Cheers
Originally posted by goos3
reply to post by akushla99
If you are quoting Christ, you should know that homosexuality is wrong.
So i don't get why you disagree.
Originally posted by akushla99
Originally posted by goos3
Originally posted by akushla99
reply to post by goos3
PS it's funny how you say think for myself, but you say cheers just because everyone else does.
my sheeple radar is going HAYWIRE.edit on 21-5-2011 by goos3 because: (no reason given)
Noted!
In future i will not be so civil with you!
Cheers
Originally posted by goos3
Originally posted by akushla99
Originally posted by goos3
Originally posted by akushla99
reply to post by goos3
PS it's funny how you say think for myself, but you say cheers just because everyone else does.
my sheeple radar is going HAYWIRE.edit on 21-5-2011 by goos3 because: (no reason given)
Noted!
In future i will not be so civil with you!
Cheers
Last time i checked.
"Get a life, idiots."
Is not very civil.
Maybe if you didn't come into the thread acting like a child, people would be nicer.edit on 21-5-2011 by goos3 because: (no reason given)edit on 21-5-2011 by goos3 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by akushla99
Originally posted by goos3
reply to post by akushla99
If you are quoting Christ, you should know that homosexuality is wrong.
So i don't get why you disagree.
What exactly did christ say about homosexuality?
Cheers
Source
9 “‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death. Because they have cursed their father or mother, their blood will be on their own head.
Originally posted by akushla99
Originally posted by goos3
Originally posted by akushla99
Originally posted by goos3
Originally posted by akushla99
reply to post by goos3
PS it's funny how you say think for myself, but you say cheers just because everyone else does.
my sheeple radar is going HAYWIRE.edit on 21-5-2011 by goos3 because: (no reason given)
Noted!
In future i will not be so civil with you!
Cheers
Last time i checked.
"Get a life, idiots."
Is not very civil.
Maybe if you didn't come into the thread acting like a child, people would be nicer.edit on 21-5-2011 by goos3 because: (no reason given)edit on 21-5-2011 by goos3 because: (no reason given)
Yeah, you are right...but it isnt directed at anyone in particular!
The interesting part is that you have taken offence by including yourself...i did not do this to you!
Cheers
Originally posted by Titen-Sxull
reply to post by technical difficulties
No, there are no logical arguments against gay marriage. There's some contrived nonsense about how somehow other people's families will collapse, or that children will be adversely affected when being raised by gays. This is absurd because single people, male or female, can raise a child... but apparently two females who are in love or two males who are in love shouldn't be able to
There's no logical reason to deny gays the same rights heterosexual people have always enjoyed which is why most of those who are against it are against it for absurd religious reasons. They quote from the same book that says shellfish is an abomination and that a rebellious child who disrespects their parents should be put to death:
Source
9 “‘Anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death. Because they have cursed their father or mother, their blood will be on their own head.
Yeah, this looks like the book we should be getting our morals from
edit on 21-5-2011 by Titen-Sxull because: added link