UFO - STS 134 Space Shuttle Endeavour AMS 02 Install Timelapse.

What is the object we can see at 1:28 ?



Here is the frame:



I know, no matter what it is, Nasa, MSM, as well as the devoutly skeptical are always gone to give the same explanation, debris from de ship, reflection, etc. However, Im pretty sure you are aware about the tons of vids concerning ufos in nasa's transmitions along the years. Do your own research and you will have some insights.

All I ask you is, think for yourself and take your own conclusions.

Here another intriguing vid:

20.05.2011 - SOUTH GERMANY



What you think?

A nice weekend to all

2nd video looks like rockets fired into the thunderstorm to trigger lightning so the guy filming can get some good shots.

1st video is intesting as it cuts scene as soon as the object apears.

Originally posted by kamatty
1st video is intesting as it cuts scene as soon as the object apears.

edit on 21-5-2011 by kamatty because: spelling typo

This is exactly what I was thinking, it seems that the cut is precisely to hide the passage of the strange object.

Regarding the second one, you may be correct.

Thanks for your input.

Second video looks like those RODS things.

reply to post by RUSSO

If you notice when the Red Tint on the video came up is when this thing showed up. That means they were using the Infared Camera. They also have an Ultraviolet Camera on there. They use these so they can make sure they don't run into anyone they can't see. But you saw how fast they switched back. When watching the NASA Channel, watch for the changes in the Tint of the Video.

Good thread, Thanks S&F

reply to post by emberscott


The first object seems to be in front of the trees as it starts to raise.

But the question is how the camera's smooth operation was obtained when these "unknown" objects appeared in the field of view without warning when he was merely after a thunderstorm.

Im pretty sure that the first vid object is a reflection.

In the first video, what about that white dot that is seen between seconds six and eight?

It may be moving--if at all--no faster than the earth behind it, but it seems too distinct to be a white reflection from a large something on the earth's surface at that distance.

reply to post by RUSSO


I am not sure, but on youtube a guy called Undercoveralien checked this out and examined it, I would ask him about him personally.

I'm always skeptical about NASA vids. Not because I don't believe in UFOs, because I do (though, I support different theories about them than most) but because we don't know how much each video has been... tampered.

NASA are a very secretive organisation. If UFO's exist, they'd certainly know about it and would do all they could to cover it up.

Originally posted by koperniguz
Im pretty sure that the first vid object is a reflection.

Im pretty sure you are wrong.

Originally posted by Aliensun
In the first video, what about that white dot that is seen between seconds six and eight?

It may be moving--if at all--no faster than the earth behind it, but it seems too distinct to be a white reflection from a large something on the earth's surface at that distance.

I saw that too, and froze it at 7 seconds. It looks like a perfect sphere and partially in shadow to the lower half or less. It doesn't look like a puff of cloud in the distance, weather balloon??

Originally posted by smurfy

Originally posted by Aliensun
In the first video, what about that white dot that is seen between seconds six and eight?

It may be moving--if at all--no faster than the earth behind it, but it seems too distinct to be a white reflection from a large something on the earth's surface at that distance.

I saw that too, and froze it at 7 seconds. It looks like a perfect sphere and partially in shadow to the lower half or less. It doesn't look like a puff of cloud in the distance, weather balloon??

Maybe a rod. but the main object does not look a rod.Who knows?

Originally posted by RUSSO

Originally posted by koperniguz
Im pretty sure that the first vid object is a reflection.

Im pretty sure you are wrong.

edit on 21-5-2011 by RUSSO because: (no reason given)

I'm not pretty sure or not pretty sure. But koperniguz's explanation is just as plausible as any. Was the vidoe shot from a camera mounted OUTSIDE the station, or was it shot through a window from WITHIN? If it was shot from within then WHY COULDN'T it be a reflection on the inside surface of the window through which it was filmed?

I'm not saying I'm pretty sure one way or the other. I'm just saying - let's not be too quick to judge. None of us were on board when this was filmed. We just don't have enough empirical evidence to draw any conclusions with any degree of confidence. Like many of these NASA vids - belief is in the eye of the beholder, it seems...

Either way - thanks for posting it OP - we love looking at them and wondering what they could be - even if we are all frustratingly never able to be 'pretty sure' about much of anything...

Originally posted by RUSSO

Seems to be moving at orbital direction/rate, perhaps a very bright celestial object. If we can determine the exact date/time of the image, and thus the location of the station in its orbit, we could get a map of the visible celestial sphere and see -- for example -- where the Moon was.

Seeing the Earth fly by like that is hypnotizing.

Beautifull.

reply to post by westrock2000

In my opinion you already made up your mind............

Don't know what it is, but IMHO it's a physical object and not a reflection.

Originally posted by TheLogicalist
reply to post by westrock2000

 

In my opinion you already made up your mind............

edit on 21-5-2011 by TheLogicalist because: (no reason given)

If that were true, RUSSO wouldn't have said "think for yourself and take your own conclusions". He'd be forcing his opinion and not asking others what they think it is.

Is my suggestion of an investigative approach involving determining what was in the sky -- on the celestial sphere -- helpful, along with specification of the necessary information to begin that process? Should this be done, or should it be avoided?

After watching it numerous times, it looks almost like it could be part of the machine. It is pretty weird. It could be off in the distance. It's movement seems to have the same speed as the machine.

Possibility for the 2nd Video
RODS Optical Illusion