It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kozzy
They should have bought Leopards or Abrams.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Days of the MTB are not over nothing is a more psychological and devastating weapons platform than the MTB.
Originally posted by Kozzy
And was it worth it? No, no it wasn't at all.
They should have bought Leopards or Abrams.
Originally posted by FredT
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Days of the MTB are not over nothing is a more psychological and devastating weapons platform than the MTB.
Agreed, but given the limits of airlift and the huge logistical supply chain, comined with an increasingly effective anti tank weaponry, its days are numbered. Why then is the Army moving towards more eaily delpoyed stryker battalions? What are we going to to do if the next conflict is not conviently located near a pre-positioned M1 formation? It took over a month in GWII to get the number of tanks they wanted. The M1A2 is the baddest tank to ever take the field, but its only a matter of time.
BTW, did ZChang agree to debate you? You know, I also think he usues more than one name on ATS.