8.4 EQ Libya?

13 pages and 56 stars for something that was proven to be baseless in the first page?

second

Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
13 pages and 56 stars for something that was proven to be baseless in the first page?

second

Hey I did my part. I alerted the post as HOAX and/or FALSE information, and yet it is still here and STILL false. There was no 8.4 earthquake ANYWHERE on planet Earth.

Besides, if there WAS one, I would have posted it first anyway... Because I monitor GEE and would have seen it within minutes.

With your post, it's 14 pgs. (had to say it)

Actually, if you read through a few of the posts you will see that more info and links were being posted as it progressed. A discussion was born and theories were put forth. If you Google it, there were hundreds of other forums on sites discussing the same thing at the same time.

Nothing wrong with that IMO. That's how we get answers.

Thanks!

In the middle of desert. NOT OFF THE COAST OF LIBYA. Occured;

Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:57:19 +0000 UTC

Antelope Auto - Event 7699 NEAR COAST OF LIBYA
Date Time Err RMS Latitude Longitude Smaj Smin Az Depth Err Ndef Nsta Gap mdist Mdist Qual Author OrigID
2011/05/19 14:49:02.48 -1.00 0.72 30.7220 10.7871 -1.0 -1.0 -1 30.0 -1.0 7 7 345 11.02 21.96 a i ke orMb 7984


Magnitude Err Nsta Author OrigID
mb 8.4 0.00 1 orbevproc 7984

Sta Dist EvAz Phase Time TRes Azim AzRes Slow SRes Def SNR Amp Per Qual Magnitude ArrID
MATE 11.02 24.1 P 14:51:38.495 0.4 T__ 49.0 m__ 0.0 106669
TIR 12.90 32.0 P 14:52:03.485 -0.2 T__ 15.9 m__ 0.0 106670
MTUR 18.31 33.6 P 14:53:14.738 0.7 T__ 12.4 m__ 0.0 106655
VOIR 18.45 33.1 P 14:53:16.368 0.8 T__ 25.1 m__ 0.0 106657
CFR 19.82 38.3 P 14:53:30.958 0.4 T__ 41.6 m__ 0.0 106671
MILM 21.33 35.5 P 14:53:45.818 -1.2 T__ 12.8 m__ 0.0 106672
SORM 21.96 32.6 P 14:53:52.818 -0.9 T__ 25.3 1001.5 0.40 m__ mb 8.4 106673






Coordinates as read: Magnitude Latitude Longitude Depth
8.4 30.7220 10.7871 30.0



While 30kn is shallow the meters can't distinguish between EQs and Bombas. 200-250 KM from the location of the Tripoli bombing is irrational.

Was it an EQ? Was it a Bombing? The questions continue to mount.I IMPLORE you keep searching for an answer. E-mail the recording sites if you must.

guys use your brains

this is ats

if this was a real coverup

the thread would have been closed and it wouldve disappeared long ago

you should all know that by now, ats is in bed with the powers that be

For those that are interested in getting to the bottom of this, here's the question you need to be asking yourself first above all else:

How often do seismic misreadings happen ?

And search the web to try to find your answer.

If the answer is quite regularly, then odds are that's what it is.
If the answer is never or very rarely, then it's time to dig further with more questions.

Analytical deduction... let it be your friend.

reply to post by jude11


its not just the op that thinks this is strange read this one ...

somethings amiss here !!! ???

Two different European earthquake monitoring sites (here and here) reported an 8.4 earthquake deep inside the Libyan desert about 30 miles southeast of Sinawin on May 19. The epicenter was approximately 120 miles south of the Mediterranean coast and roughly 200 miles southwest of Tripoli. Here are the earthquake details:

vanshardware.com... -earthquake/ check the link out

Is this earthquake being censored? If so, was it a subterranean detonation in a remote desert location to safely demonstrate Libya’s nuclear capabilities to its Western attackers? The West would certainly want to contain that information to prevent widespread panic since a 50 megaton nuke could utterly wipe out an entire metropolis. Was the earthquake the result of a NATO attack? Or was the earthquake a real, natural event or simply a strange glitch on a pair of seismic instruments?

there asking the same questions

food for thought ?

ww3 ??

i hope not

reply to post by emberscott


Why the questions? The case is solved.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by periloustimes


No what we have here is one site - EMSC - that received a signal in Strasbourg that had got corrupted and correctly posted the information. Once reviewed it was removed. We then have another site, and many forums, who are not interested in doing any research but are happy to spout erroneous information without a care in the world.

There is nothing significant about this except the stupidity of some earthquake so called monitoring sites that are not capable or prepared to recheck information received. It did not take 5 minutes to find the seismo that caused the problem and see that there was no event. If I can do it then so can anyone else.

reply to post by CranialSponge

How often do seismic misreadings happen ?

And search the web to try to find your answer.

If the answer is quite regularly, then odds are that's what it is.
If the answer is never or very rarely, then it's time to dig further with more questions.

Exactly - research!!!!!

Answer, fairly frequently and these false readings have produce quakes as high as 8.5 before. There will be several, normally much lower and therefore not noticed, events such as this in the course of a year. It is basically an artefact of the telemetry systems used to send the data to the central database. Signals get corrupted and the computers at the central receiving area perceive a sudden increase in signal after a line drop as an earthquake event.

You can read about one such event here which explains this.

vanshardware.com...

Two different European earthquake monitoring sites (here and here) reported an 8.4 earthquake deep inside the Libyan desert about 30 miles southeast of Sinawin on May 19. The epicenter was approximately 120 miles south of the Mediterranean coast and roughly 200 miles southwest of Tripoli. Here are the earthquake details:

i dont know folks but i thought this was a interesting read-

i still think there was no 8.4 tho- but i just wanted to share this.

I, too have been watching the 'Libyan Earthquake' issue. I also saw it 'happen' before my eyes. Mistake? Cover-up? Who knows for sure. What I DO know for sure is that SINCE WE CAN NOT RELY ON MAINSTREAM MEDIA FOR ACCURATE INFORMATION, it is important that we throw all we hear into our forums for discussion IN AN ATTEMPT TO FIND THE TRUTH. If that information turns out to be inaccurate, so be it, but it is the only process we have. WE MUST REFRAIN FROM JUDGING THOSE WHO ARE SIMPLY PASSING ON INFO FOR DISCUSSION AND VERIFICATION.



The Truth Shall Set You Free; But First It Will Piss You Off

Originally posted by aint2common
I, too have been watching the 'Libyan Earthquake' issue. I also saw it 'happen' before my eyes. Mistake? Cover-up? Who knows for sure. What I DO know for sure is that SINCE WE CAN NOT RELY ON MAINSTREAM MEDIA FOR ACCURATE INFORMATION, it is important that we throw all we hear into our forums for discussion IN AN ATTEMPT TO FIND THE TRUTH. If that information turns out to be inaccurate, so be it, but it is the only process we have. WE MUST REFRAIN FROM JUDGING THOSE WHO ARE SIMPLY PASSING ON INFO FOR DISCUSSION AND VERIFICATION.



The Truth Shall Set You Free; But First It Will Piss You Off

Ahh, Sound advice!

If only ATS were like this.