It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If this doesnt convince the kool-aid drinkers that Pelosi and Co. aren't a bunch of elitist nuts, then nothing will.
No, that is a comparison.
Name calling would be stating that you are a 4 year old.
For someone that passes themselves off as knowing it all, you really justify that you don't.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by macman
No, that is a comparison.
Name calling would be stating that you are a 4 year old.
For someone that passes themselves off as knowing it all, you really justify that you don't.
Could you please get back on topic and answer the question I asked?
Or is our discussion over?
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by macman
No, you are not right. You can't present any logical argument, so you try insults...and when you are called on those...you use it to try to dodge quetions that are on topic.
Continue to dodge my question...it is entertaining....and very telling.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by macman
Let me know if you want to get back on topic.
You can start by answering this question that you have been trying to dodge.
Do you understand there is no "Obamacare" that anyone will subscribe to or purchase???
Originally posted by Runaway1977
Originally posted by AntiNWO
Mindless Obamabots are incapable of discussing politics without namecalling because you all think it's some kind of wildcard that trumps all logic.
I just wanted to quote you before you realized what you wrote and fixed it. This kind of thing is what I keep coming back for. Those "Obamabots" and their darn name calling.
Originally posted by mishigas
I just found this thread - what a great topic! S&F for you, anon72.
To me, these waivers are the most blatant example of graft and corruption I have ever seen. This admin is so corrupt that it doesn't even attempt to hide it's dirty deeds.
What is the justification for these waivers? Can someone explain? I'd wager that a study of the recipients would show a strong margin for campaign donors.
Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting.
When ObamaCare is repealed then all the waivers become - null and void - .
Sombody needs to push for a bill or somthing that brings all political officials into the same health coverage pool that they pushed onto us. If they didn't want to do it that way from the start, for obvious reasons then I would think it would be easy to play them at their own game and get somthing changed around to have them deal with it too.
edit on 24-5-2011 by Mailman because: (no reason given)
Pelosi was the poster-child even more so than Obama. They planned on cutting corners because they know every little detail already.
Sombody needs to push for a bill or somthing that brings all political officials into the same health coverage pool that they pushed onto us. If they didn't want to do it that way from the start, for obvious reasons then I would think it would be easy to play them at their own game and get somthing changed around to have them deal with it too.
edit on 24-5-2011 by Mailman because: (no reason given)
Pelosi was the poster-child even more so than Obama. They planned on cutting corners because they know every little detail already.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by Eurisko2012
When ObamaCare is repealed then all the waivers become - null and void - .
That's great - if it is repealed. We can only hope.