It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Drake Equation - Wikipedia
The Drake equation states that: N = R* x fp x ne x fl x fi x fc x L
Where N = the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which communication might be possible;
R* = the average rate of star formation per year in our galaxy
fp = the fraction of those stars that have planets
ne = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets
fℓ = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop life at some point
fi = the fraction of the above that actually go on to develop intelligent life
fc = the fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of their existence into space
L = the length of time for which such civilizations release detectable signals into space.
R* = 10/year (10 stars formed per year, on the average over the life of the galaxy)
fp = 0.5 (half of all stars formed will have planets)
ne = 2 (stars with planets will have 2 planets capable of developing life)
fl = 1 (100% of these planets will develop life)
fi = 0.01 (1% of which will be intelligent life)
fc = 0.01 (1% of which will be able to communicate)
L = 10,000 years (which will last 10,000 years)
Drake's values give N = 10 × 0.5 × 2 × 1 × 0.01 × 0.01 × 10,000 = 10.
Originally posted by XRaDiiX
reply to post by XRaDiiX
Astronomer Quoted this in 2010 This News is a years old but i love when we get to bring it back into discussion this is my favourite topic
Odds of Life on Newfound Earth-Size Planet '100 Percent', Astronomer Says.
Now the Article refers to 581G but your article refers to 581D so i'm mixing things up. I remember reading one article talking about the potential for more than one of the planets in the Gliese 581 System to be habitable.
Originally posted by Brainiac
reply to post by Havick007
That planet Gliese 581d, is so far away that even if we could travel at the speed of light, or FTL speeds we still would never get there and back in 3000 life times...
What we are seeing from that Solar System, is 300,000 years ago... Wer'e making projections and assumptions based on a 300,000 year dis·crep·an·cy...
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
Originally posted by TheDevilOfLies
reply to post by Phage
REALLY?! the all knowing phage whos worshiped like a god cant think of any scientists who say we are the only things in the universe?
going by the way things work around here, that actually makes sense to me
I dont mind be ff topiced here by Mods, but the need to comment on Phage personally whenever he makes a post, is incredibly tiresome, and shows insecurities all round by those who say things like this, and earlier in the thread like " you like to urinate on us from high Phage" YAwn
Leave it alone, argue the posts, not the poster, you are all making the PHAGE myth, not him, by your carry on.
I don't know why you bother coming by Phage when every time you post you get little tantrums from people.
"making of a MYTH, how to project your own neediness by projecting on others, Phageism 101"
that should be my new thread
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by smurfy
No.
The story is about the French team's use of a computer model to run various possible scenarios, one of which assumed a dense CO2 atmosphere.
The new study assumes that Gliese 581d, which is about seven times as massive as Earth, has a thick, carbon-dioxide-based atmosphere. That's very possible on a planet so large, researchers said, but it's not a given.
www.space.com...
The trouble is, we do not know what sort of atmosphere (or even if there is one) the planet actually has. Without a dense CO2 atmosphere, the model is not accurate. Therefore the thread title is not accurate. The planet may support liquid water, if....
As posted before:
To determine conclusively if Gliese 581d is truly habitable, future work will probably have to detect and characterize its atmosphere directly. And that is likely years off, since it requires the development of new and advanced telescopes.edit on 5/17/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by smurfy
Originally posted by Brainiac
reply to post by Havick007
That planet Gliese 581d, is so far away that even if we could travel at the speed of light, or FTL speeds we still would never get there and back in 3000 life times...
What we are seeing from that Solar System, is 300,000 years ago... Wer'e making projections and assumptions based on a 300,000 year dis·crep·an·cy...
As I understood it, the planet is 20 light years away. The 300,000 years is probably an estimate of the current capabilty to travel there.
That's not the headline, and that's not the stories result.
What we are seeing from that Solar System, is 300,000 years ago... Wer'e making projections and assumptions based on a 300,000 year dis·crep·an·cy...
that we will NEVER be able to REACH
I've said it again and I'll say it again... We are Alone in the Universe, in relation to our technological limits..
Originally posted by iamhobo
That's really cool and stuff.
Lets just say for the hell of it that we can somehow on god's green earth attain light speed which is 670,616,700 mph (that's over half way to a billion mph if you weren't sure) or 186,282 miles per second. Well even then, at that mind numbing speed it would still take 20 years to get there.
The average speed of a space shuttle is around 19,000 mph....so basically we'd have to go 35,296 times faster to get there...in 20 years!
I hope there is some sort of bend in the space/time continuum or maybe some kind of worm hole because other wise that is inconceivable.
Originally posted by zazzafrazz
this is good news
Now we have another planet to destroy.
Hopefully by the time we can visit we aren't so viral.