It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by American-philosopher
And one more thing from the research I have done I know what goverments are capable of especially mine. ESPECIALLY MINE!!! so to say that they can;t or wouldn;t do this is grossly underestimating them.
Originally posted by American-philosopher
reply to post by network dude
Nobody does anything about it. Nobody wears masks when they go outside, they just breath this air that they claim is saturated with deadly chemicals
So what about the people who eat the food that they know is bad for them. The GMO's that are in the food. Whata bout when you take a shower and the fluoride is there..
People are not whining ! about it. they are trying to bribng it tyo the attention of others Just lijke people with the federla reserve. Just with the people with the kenedy assasination. Are they whiners just because they know Oswald didn;t do it!!!
Originally posted by wcitizen
It's interesting how there's a core group of the same people who pile onto any thread about stratospheric aerosol spraying and use their familiar tactics. Personally, if there's a topic I believe is bunkum, I just don't bother with it. If others want to discuss it, that's fine with me.
Wht's curious about the regular debunkers is that they are willing to waste so much time and effort arguing about it, as though they have some kind of agenda, rather than just live and let live and accept that different people have different points of view.
Another tactic I've noticed is that of feigning genuine interest, and seemingly 'innocently' asking for information...the sole purpose of which is to ridicule anything which may be presented.
You can spot them, they are regulars on these threads, yet they keep asking for this information and that, even though they've done exactly the same on a previous thread.
I don't give a damn whether those debunkers believe in stratospheric aerosol spraying or not. What bugs me is that they won't tolerate anyone else having a different point of view to them.
Behind the mask, some, of course, work for TPTB as paid agents. For others it's a kind of sport - aka as bullying. They are the kind of people who love ridiculing others and jump on board at the first opportunity, just for the 'sport', and that's the kind of mentality I personally loathe and despise.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
Again with the ignorant rhetoric.
If you have no evidence you have nothing to add. Period.
You don't know anything about any of us, and such accusations are offensive and childish.
If you loathe and despise people defending their various professions from the ignorance of these "chemtrail" believers, then do show us the error in anything we have put forth.
Otherwise, keep your accusations to yourself.
Originally posted by zatara
It is unbelievable that after watching some of the chemtrail pictures there are still people who say....nothing ordinairy going on there.
No matter the reason or what the content of these trails are.....something is going on. With all respect, people who have seen the pictures and insist of denying something is not normal in the sky are.....plain stupid, fools, not able to think for themselves, idiots or liers.
An other ATS member wrote it is amazing how some people put much energy and effort to debunk the believers and he is right. What can be so motivating to play stupid.....?
Originally posted by stavis
It is precisely this that one can read between the lines regarding their expression that you have no evidence for your claim, you should be quiet! It is petty and pathetic nothing and the whole thing clearly shows that their intent is quite different from developing the subject bring something being investigated around the world right now, which is what contains the chemtrail why do they exist, etc. It is better that a fool is silence and hide their stupidity than to open your mouth and dispel all doubts. In this case, debunkers-shut up!
Originally posted by stavis
reply to post by GringoViejo
You have not put up ONE SINGLE FACT that debunks chemtrails so what is your point of debunking? that question clearly have an answer- please let us have it...please...
Originally posted by stavis
Text of H.R. 2977 [107th]: Space Preservation Act of 2001
SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) The term `space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.
(2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following:
(i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--
(I) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object;
(II) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object;
(III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or
(IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means.
(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)--
(I) through the use of any of the means described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);
(II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or
(III) by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.
(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--
(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.
(C) The term `exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.
thomas.loc.gov...:h2977:
Originally posted by stavis
reply to post by stavis
spam? I am simply showing you something that you need to see. Also if you already have seen this and other releated stuff to chemtrails why are you keep nagging on? what is your goal? I want to find out everything there is to know about chemtrails and you?
peace
Originally posted by zatara
It is unbelievable that after watching some of the chemtrail pictures there are still people who say....nothing ordinairy going on there.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
reply to post by wcitizen
You accuse people here *successfully* debunking the "chemtrail" hoax as being paid by TPTB, and you think we don't find that ignorant?
Re-read the threads,
look at who is actually calling names and making baseless accusatory claims. I will give you a hint, usually the people doing it never have any evidence to back up their claims.
So again, keep your accusations to yourself.
Originally posted by wcitizen
Let me repeat it because you don't seem to be comprehending this. . You're not in a position to tell me what to say or what not to say or what I can or can't express, here or anywhere else.
In fact, you seem to have a problem with comprehension, because if not, you would have seen that my post was specifically referring to a small group of debunkers who jump on all the 'chemtrail' threads with the only aim of disrupting, insulting, and ridiculing others who have a different point of view from them...or in some cases, perhaps, from the gubberment.
There are many other members who genuinely want to explore the issue, they may agree or disagree with the existence of chemtrails, but they're here to genuinely discuss and explore the issue, and those discussions can often be enriching and are never a problem for me, at least, on the contrary.
The problem is that that kind of discussion is too often sabotaged by the same small group of those who simply won't tolerate others having a different point of view to their own.