It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CountDrac
reply to post by JoeDaShom
27000 people? are you kidding me?
doesnt matter how old he is, he should be punished and die slowly.
Originally posted by CountDrac
reply to post by Kram09
An eye for an eye? Are you promoting anarchy?
We live in a society that when someone commits a crime he gets punished. By your statement we should let all the people in jail free.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
In some countries it is illegal to question the holocaust.
Questioning = Holocaust denial. Holocaust denial = illegal.
Talking about other holocausts? 'Trivializing the Holocaust" = illegal.
Americans are lucky when it comes to their freedom to question things.
Originally posted by CountDrac
reply to post by pityocamptes
war is war, and people die.
However Genocide of six million innocent people who did nothing is not war. Its massacre and a sin to all humanity…
Originally posted by theknuckler
reply to post by whaaa
I agree with the following orders thing, but that's what makes it so mind boggling. If you were given the choice of 'either kill them or we're killing you' what would you do? It's really a good question (I think). I mean that was a scary time, I think we'd like to say 'given the choice, I'd take death over killing the innocent' but it's not so cut and dry. I really don't know what to think of this.
Originally posted by JoeDaShom
I think it's kind of despicable to go after the guy when he is that old... if you were going to go after him, you should have done it many years ago. And yet, there are worst criminals still committing crimes that nobody does a damn thing about.
S&F