What is happening at 37.75N latitude?

What

www.greatwarning.com

Bearing in mind the previous posts today, about the eruption of Mt. Etna and the earthquake in Spain. We ask ourselves what is happening along the 37.7N latitude, and are these events connected.

Mt. Etna
37.74° N

Spain Earthquakes
37.699 N
and
37.693 N

(visit the link for the full news article)


Interesting that the Spain earthquakes today and Mt. Etna are at the same latitude. As is Fukuskima, Ft. Knox, and San Francisco.

There's also some additional observations about Edgar Cayce at the same site. Seems like this flooding might correspond to some of what Cayce predicted, as is the Mt. Etna eruption.

Related News Links:
www.greatwarning.com

(AGI) Palermo - A seismic swarm shook the earth on Mt Etna with six quakes, spaced out within short time intervals.

Link to article

Nice catch,
Hopefully it continues to form a pattern.

reply to post by LilyFlower


Good lord, this line of lattitude goes right around the whole planet!!

(look at a map of recent quakes and tell me if you can still see a pattern).

That is some VERY interesting information. Thanks OP

I see Mt Etna is also clearing her throat; she's spewing stuff as of right now, in fact.

reply to post by LilyFlower


The latitude and longitude of New Madrid, Missouri is:
36° 35' 11" N / 89° 31' 40" W

If there is something happening at 37.5 deg, then the New Madrid fault could be next. It isn't far off at all, and the Mississippi flooding could exasperate it. Maybe when the flood waters recede over the next 2 to 3 weeks? Pressure released?

reply to post by LilyFlower


Dear LilyFlower,

What area along the New Madrid fault lies on the same path, if you know? Another question I have is related to the magnetic pole movement that occurred. Dr. Kaku stated that there is a possibility of increased solar activity into 2012, he also said that he believed the sun's magnetic pole will shift. Dr. Kaku on the suns impending polar shift. We know that our pole has shifted slightly, I have been wondering if the shift in the suns magnetic pole has been affecting ours. A magnetic pole shift is expected every 25,000 years roughly and it has been hypothesized that this results in wild climate change and earthquakes and volcanoes. Dr. Michio Kaku is not some simpleton, he is one of the best in physics today. When he says the sun's magnetic pole is going to shift, I for one am going to listen.

Originally posted by LilyFlower

Mt. Etna
37.74° N

Spain Earthquakes
37.699 N
and
37.693 N

Interesting that the Spain earthquakes today and Mt. Etna are at the same latitude.

Intersting that they are not!

As is Fukuskima, Ft. Knox, and San Francisco.

Fukushima: 37°25′22.7″N

Fort Knox: 37°53′34″N

San Francisco: 37°46′45.48″N

OMG OMG OMG - no they are not!!

Well except some bits of SF may be the same as some of the others - it's a big city.......

The Tohoku EQ was at 38.322°N.... fairly close latitude.. reminds me of an old "debunked" torsion wave "theory"... platonic solids spin physics and wave forms.... nah...

reply to post by AQuestion


There is a vast difference between a pole shift, and a MAGNETIC pole shift.

A magnetic pole shift can result in some bizarre changes on earth, but the sun goes through magnetic pole shift on a pretty frequent basis. Does that have an impact on us on Earth? Sure... but to wht extent is not well known or understood yet.

Anyhow.. be sure yu get clear what you're asking about. A physical pole shift would result in disasterous consequences; a magnetic would result in consequences that we can't anticipate, yet.

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by LilyFlower

Mt. Etna
37.74° N

Spain Earthquakes
37.699 N
and
37.693 N

Interesting that the Spain earthquakes today and Mt. Etna are at the same latitude.

Intersting that they are not!

As is Fukuskima, Ft. Knox, and San Francisco.

Fukushima: 37°25′22.7″N

Fort Knox: 37°53′34″N

San Francisco: 37°46′45.48″N

OMG OMG OMG - no they are not!!

Well except some bits of SF may be the same as some of the others - it's a big city.......

edit on 11-5-2011 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)

I don't know about that, the original source has linkbacks with the latitudes given.

Fukushima 37.75N, Fort Knox 37.8N, and SF 37.75N

Source

Nothing extraordinary.

Etna is very active, and latitudes around parallel 37 must be some of the latitudes with most land mass.

More or less at that latitude we have some 20 small earthquakes per month only in Portugal.

reply to post by Jomina


Dear Jomina,

I understand the differance. I do understand that it is a magnetic shift not a "pole" shift. Still the magna will also shift. A physical shift rather than a magnetic shift would be cataclysmic. I don't anticipate an end of the world. I have been reading up on magnetic pole shifts and there are some that believe they cause extreme changes, rather than complete destruction.

I wish I had the link. A meteorologist in the midwest made a YouTube video in which she stated that she believed solar flairs could account for some of the things we are seeing on earth because of their effect on our atmosphere and I don't know how to find the link, sorry.

Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by LilyFlower

 

Good lord, this line of lattitude goes right around the whole planet!!

(look at a map of recent quakes and tell me if you can still see a pattern).

edit on 11/5/2011 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)

HAHAHA!!! Awesome. Thank you for that.

Yeah all it takes it one look at the global earthquake map to notice that the 37'th parallel is a drop in the bucket.
You know what, looking at the earthquake map and the tectonic plate map, it looks to me like there might be some kind of connection between those two things.

reply to post by AQuestion


I found something of interest. You have to scroll down the linked page; but, it gives a listing of where quakes were occurring on the New Madrid fault and yep, on the same line.New Madrid Quakes. I have not independently checked these coordinates; but, they are all around 36 degrees.

Mag. 2.0 April 23 07:21:26 36.270 -89.500 7.2 2 km (1 mi) WNW of Ridgely, TN
Mag. 1.7 April 23 17:05:49 35.530 -84.500 10.9 5 km (3 mi) ENE of Niota, TN
Mag. 1.8 April 23 22:54:59 36.520 -89.580 7.1 3 km (2 mi) E of Marston, MO
Mag. 1.5 April 24 05:12:34 36.490 -89.550 8.4 6 km (4 mi) ESE of Marston, MO
Mag. 2.5 April 25 00:45:46 35.910 -89.950 12.2 4 km (2 mi) SW of Blytheville, AR
Mag. 1.9 April 25 01:17:28 35.770 -90.150 0.4 9 km (5 mi) W of Victoria, AR
Mag. 2.4 April 23 07:11:19 36.270 -89.500 7.1 2 km (1 mi) WNW of Ridgely, TN

Originally posted by LilyFlower

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

As is Fukuskima, Ft. Knox, and San Francisco.

Fukushima: 37°25′22.7″N

Fort Knox: 37°53′34″N

San Francisco: 37°46′45.48″N

OMG OMG OMG - no they are not!!

Well except some bits of SF may be the same as some of the others - it's a big city.......

edit on 11-5-2011 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)

I don't know about that, the original source has linkbacks with the latitudes given.

Fukushima 37.75N,

They says they give the location of the power plant - that lattitude is the city - 37°46′N - not the powerplant - the powerplant is where I said it is. So they are either ignorant of the difference betwen the city and the powerplant, or cherry picking this one to make their case look better.

Which do you think?

Fort Knox 37.8N,

as I said

and SF 37.75N

As I said.

So, as I said, no they are not all at the same line of latitude!

And none of them are on the same line as the initial 3 either.

Originally posted by LilyFlower

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by LilyFlower

Mt. Etna
37.74° N

Spain Earthquakes
37.699 N
and
37.693 N

Interesting that the Spain earthquakes today and Mt. Etna are at the same latitude.

Intersting that they are not!

As is Fukuskima, Ft. Knox, and San Francisco.

Fukushima: 37°25′22.7″N

Fort Knox: 37°53′34″N

San Francisco: 37°46′45.48″N

OMG OMG OMG - no they are not!!

Well except some bits of SF may be the same as some of the others - it's a big city.......

edit on 11-5-2011 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)

I don't know about that, the original source has linkbacks with the latitudes given.

Fukushima 37.75N, Fort Knox 37.8N, and SF 37.75N

Source

edit on 11-5-2011 by LilyFlower because: Added source

I'm curious how these locations are being measured. Most coordinates give a lat or long line followed by minutes, then seconds. As a result, you'd never have a minute coordinate higher than 59'. Google earth shows Ft. Knox at 37degrees, 59 minutes and 12.57 seconds north

Dear Fearmongers,
patterns will emerge in any series of events if you dig deep enough.
also, all lines of alttitude circle the whole planet, thats what they do.

Originally posted by userid1

Originally posted by LilyFlower

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by LilyFlower

Mt. Etna
37.74° N

Spain Earthquakes
37.699 N
and
37.693 N

Interesting that the Spain earthquakes today and Mt. Etna are at the same latitude.

Intersting that they are not!

As is Fukuskima, Ft. Knox, and San Francisco.

Fukushima: 37°25′22.7″N

Fort Knox: 37°53′34″N

San Francisco: 37°46′45.48″N

OMG OMG OMG - no they are not!!

Well except some bits of SF may be the same as some of the others - it's a big city.......

edit on 11-5-2011 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)

I don't know about that, the original source has linkbacks with the latitudes given.

Fukushima 37.75N, Fort Knox 37.8N, and SF 37.75N

Source

edit on 11-5-2011 by LilyFlower because: Added source

I'm curious how these locations are being measured. Most coordinates give a lat or long line followed by minutes, then seconds. As a result, you'd never have a minute coordinate higher than 59'. Google earth shows Ft. Knox at 37degrees, 59 minutes and 12.57 seconds north

For any degree, 45 minutes corresponds to .75, 30 minutes is .5, etc. Most of the sites referenced by the source use decimal notation.

The distance of one degree latitiude is 69mi, so for a person quibbling about 37.7, 37.75, and 37.8 degrees (for example) they are talking about a range of .1 degree or seven miles.

Originally posted by AQuestion
reply to post by LilyFlower

 

Dear LilyFlower,

What area along the New Madrid fault lies on the same path, if you know? Another question I have is related to the magnetic pole movement that occurred. Dr. Kaku stated that there is a possibility of increased solar activity into 2012, he also said that he believed the sun's magnetic pole will shift. Dr. Kaku on the suns impending polar shift. We know that our pole has shifted slightly, I have been wondering if the shift in the suns magnetic pole has been affecting ours. A magnetic pole shift is expected every 25,000 years roughly and it has been hypothesized that this results in wild climate change and earthquakes and volcanoes. Dr. Michio Kaku is not some simpleton, he is one of the best in physics today. When he says the sun's magnetic pole is going to shift, I for one am going to listen.

You may already know this but the Sun reverses its poles every 11 years. 2012 is when it reverses its poles again.

What worries me is the 11 degree pole shift of the Earth that Edgar Cayce predicted decades ago.
There has already been a 10 degree shift in the magnetic poles of the Earth. So what we need to know is: is a magnetic pole shift a precursor to the actual physical shifting of the Earth's poles?

Because if it is, we are in trouble. Even an 11 degree pole shift -- this would explain the major geological changes that Cayce saw in his visions of the future.