It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mactire
Originally posted by nedined
reply to post by QuantumPhysicist
He is saying that he is in Russia but he may be only using a Russian proxy server and be anywhere in the world, even still in the USA. He just may want to make others thinking that he is in Russia... That’s even better way to hide!
He may still be working in the lab (assuming he's a lab rat), and mentioned that he's on the run to keep the authorities guessing. That way he could continue his research, and then use proxies to throw the dogs off his scent. "He's in Russia" "He's in Japan".
Makes sense to me, it's what I'd do.edit on 8-5-2011 by Mactire because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Mactire
reply to post by seeker11
Japan or not, he could still be using proxies to hide in Russia, using Russian faux IPs. Russia is a pretty big place. roughly 1/8 of the world's land mass.
“a world-spanning network of devices sensitive to coherence and resonance in the mental domain. Continuous streams of data are sent over the internet to be archived and correlated with events that may evoke a world-wide consciousness. Examples that appear to have done so include both peaceful gatherings and disasters: a few minutes around midnight on any New Years Eve, the first hour of NATO bombing in Yugoslavia, the Papal visit to Israel, a variety of global meditations, several major earthquakes, and now September 11.”
A mobile phone application could help monitor the way infectious diseases such as flu are spread.
The FluPhone app was developed by researchers at the University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory.
Volunteers' phones fitted with the app "talk" to each other, recording how many people each "infected subject" meets during an imaginary epidemic.
The university is one of seven institutions working on the study to reduce the impact of epidemics.
The FluPhone app uses Bluetooth technology to anonymously record interaction between volunteers involved in the study.
When mobile phones come into close proximity, that fact is recorded and data is sent automatically to the research team.
'Valuable insight'
Professor Jon Crowcroft and Dr Eiko Yoneki, co-principal investigators of the study, said they believed the collected data could be used to simulate social interaction during a real epidemic or pandemic.
A three-month FluPhone pilot study, using a basic version of the app, was conducted in Cambridge in 2010.
Dr Yoneki said: "The data was a valuable insight into how human communities are formed, how much time people spend together, and how frequently they meet.
"Such data show complex network-like structures, which is very useful for understanding the spread of disease."
Monitoring behaviour during a simulated epidemic could help prevent the disease spreading
Prof Crowcroft explained epidemiologists traditionally monitor how a disease spreads by asking patients to keep diaries of their movements and social contacts.
"That's very heavy-going and people often forget to do it, or forget who they've met," he said.
The FluPhone app was, he explained, a more reliable way to record contact between "infectious subjects".
"Provided we have people's permission, we can upload the data, and medical researchers can see who met whom within the set of volunteers, without there being any missing encounters.
"That's very important because meeting a lot of people may be the principal way diseases are spread.
"Armed with that sort of information, medics could then direct advice towards those people and perhaps slow down the spread of an epidemic.
"As long as we get a reasonable number of people taking part, meeting other people taking part, then we will get that understanding," he said.
'What-if experiments'
An upgraded version of the FluPhone app has now been released that can transmit "fake pathogens" to volunteers' phones.
Prof Crowcroft said the team was now able to run "what-if experiments" on the volunteers by randomly choosing which phones should be "infected".
"The data collected could inform the way medical advice is given by the government during a real epidemic," he said.
"We probably can't stop an epidemic just through advice, but if we can slow it down, medical intervention could be directed more effectively, for example at treating serious cases, or developing vaccines."
Originally posted by cry93
Originally posted by SigmundFRAUD
Psaaah. Forget about Bombay Blood. The rare blood type website ( which includes Bombay blood states,
AB Negative Blood Group
AB Negative Blood Groups is considered as rarest of the rare blood group , If you are AB Negative Blood Type or if you know some one with AB Negative Blood Type . Please register as AB Negative Blood Donor immediately.
100% of the population can receive your platelets.
Patients who need platelets:
Dengue Fever Patients, Cancer Patients, Organ transplant patients
100% of the population can receive your plasma.
Plasma improves a patient's ability to stop bleeding by supplementing clotting factors, and it restores blood volume to the patient. Burn victims can often use several hundred units of plasma during their recovery period. Other patients who often required Plasma are Newborn babies, Leukemia patients, trauma patients, hemophiliacs and transplant or cardiovascular surgery.
Good grief.
O- cannot receive blood byproducts from anyone except for another O-. Even AB negative can receive O- by products. AB- is the rarest when it comes to the percentage of people with this type. However, O- is the purest and can be effectively given to anyone, Rh positive or Rh negative, regardless of blood type.
I don't know where some of this misinformation comes from.
Originally posted by SigmundFRAUD
CRY93 said, Good grief. O- cannot receive blood byproducts from anyone except for another O-. Even AB negative can receive O- by products. AB- is the rarest when it comes to the percentage of people with this type. However, O- is the purest and can be effectively given to anyone, Rh positive or Rh negative, regardless of blood type.
I don't know where some of this misinformation comes from.
So O is the "purest" because it is the most common and can be given to most people. Ahhh....Hmmm.
Well I dont know where your information came from, but mine came from the American Red Cross and International Rare Blood type registry.
I have NEVER seen any blood being referred to as "the most pure" as this sounds rediculous.
Oh and btw, someone needs to stretch their sarcasm detection muscle, I think yours might be off kilter.
Originally posted by cry93
Originally posted by SigmundFRAUD
CRY93 said, Good grief. O- cannot receive blood byproducts from anyone except for another O-. Even AB negative can receive O- by products. AB- is the rarest when it comes to the percentage of people with this type. However, O- is the purest and can be effectively given to anyone, Rh positive or Rh negative, regardless of blood type.
I don't know where some of this misinformation comes from.
So O is the "purest" because it is the most common and can be given to most people. Ahhh....Hmmm.
Well I dont know where your information came from, but mine came from the American Red Cross and International Rare Blood type registry.
I have NEVER seen any blood being referred to as "the most pure" as this sounds rediculous.
Oh and btw, someone needs to stretch their sarcasm detection muscle, I think yours might be off kilter.
O- is the purest because it lacks A & B antigens (hence it being O) and it lacks the Rh factor (hence it being -). I'll even explain to you that A has the A antigen. B has the B antigen. AB has both A and B antigens. O has NO antigen. So A can get A and O blood. B can receive B and O blood. AB can receive A, B, and O blood.
Go back to the Red Cross website and read again. AB+ is actually the universal recipient from all blood types. AB- is the universal recipient amongst Rh- types.
Originally posted by SigmundFRAUD
reply to post by dwmjr1985
Cry98 and DWMjr,
I think the real FACT here is that a certain someone, or "someones"....don't / doesn't understand the differences between plasma, platelets and whole blood. But by all means, now that you've called me out..LOL...go ahead and call the American Red Cross too. lol
Originally posted by cry93
This is my last post for a few hours. I have to get some things done.
An Rh- mom and an Rh+ (or otherwise blood type unknown father):
By 28 weeks of pregnancy, the mom will receive Rhogam. She gets this handy dandy card that she has to keep on her in cases of early delivery or some kind of accident where the blood of the mother and fetus may mix.
If the baby is Rh+ or if the mom miscarries a baby and the father isn't known to be Rh-, the mom will receive Rhogam AGAIN within 72 hours of delivery.
Every Rh- mom will receive at least 1 Rhogam shot UNLESS the father is known to be negative as well.edit on 8-5-2011 by cry93 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SigmundFRAUD
reply to post by cry93
And what of women who have their children prematurely......
uggh.
Originally posted by cry93
reply to post by SigmundFRAUD
You don't read very well, do you? Seriously, did I not state that the mom gets a card for premature births, stating when she received Rhogam?
Even if the child is early then the blood can be typed within 72 hours. It would be redundant to yet again state the obvious.
Originally posted by SigmundFRAUD
You don't read very well, do you? Seriously, did I not state that the mom gets a card for premature births, stating when she received Rhogam?
I read quite well. I am an RH- mother who has NEVER had a RhoGAM injection, and my husband was never typed. I had my child at 28 weeks, I have NEVER recieved a "card".
Where are you from? Where do you get your "information"??
Originally posted by seeker11
Originally posted by SigmundFRAUD
You don't read very well, do you? Seriously, did I not state that the mom gets a card for premature births, stating when she received Rhogam?
I read quite well. I am an RH- mother who has NEVER had a RhoGAM injection, and my husband was never typed. I had my child at 28 weeks, I have NEVER recieved a "card".
Where are you from? Where do you get your "information"??
I received that card. In fact it's still stashed in my wallet somewhere.
Originally posted by cry93
Originally posted by SigmundFRAUD
You don't read very well, do you? Seriously, did I not state that the mom gets a card for premature births, stating when she received Rhogam?
I read quite well. I am an RH- mother who has NEVER had a RhoGAM injection, and my husband was never typed. I had my child at 28 weeks, I have NEVER recieved a "card".
Where are you from? Where do you get your "information"??
I suppose you could have denied the injection but you didn't state that. If you went into labor before the 28 weeks then there is your answer. You didn't get an injection before there was no need. Your child is negative AND it was born before the 28th week.
It's as simple as that. You just like to argue, I see.
Originally posted by SigmundFRAUD
reply to post by cry93
Nah, I don't like to argue, I like to debate and discuss. I take issue with people stating the Mayo Clinic and American Red Cross are wrong and you need to call them to correct them, and then telling people to "google" if they ask for further details. I also take issue with statements being made that I know first hand are NOT fact.
Originally posted by cry93
Originally posted by SigmundFRAUD
reply to post by cry93
Nah, I don't like to argue, I like to debate and discuss. I take issue with people stating the Mayo Clinic and American Red Cross are wrong and you need to call them to correct them, and then telling people to "google" if they ask for further details. I also take issue with statements being made that I know first hand are NOT fact.
There is nothing to debate. I suspect you didn't realize that you didn't get Rhogam because you didn't make the appointment due to premature delivery. Responding to you just escalates your need to "discuss and debate" even with your rebuttals have nothing to do with the things that people are saying to you now.
In any event, Happy Mother's Day.
Originally posted by SigmundFRAUD
No, but I got the shot and the card. He's A positive.
I asked because Cry98 stated that every RH- woman who has had a baby has had at least one RhoGAM injection UNLESS the father was blood typed. She also stated that women who had premature births were given a card...
I had a premature baby, I was not given a card, I was NOT given RhoGAM, I AM AB- and I didn't "deny the injection"...as Cry98 implied. I'm not going to get into arguing what NICU doctors consider 27 weeks vs 28 weeks and how they figure it out etc because I am sure Cry98 is a Neonatal specialist as well as my press agent and a certified Hematologist....
Originally posted by Decoy
Majority of O- are British and usually have green eyes.
Decoy