It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by suterlaben
The problem is due to the fact that the oligarchs who own the NFL tried to take away the collective bargaining rights of the players, which has led to clash between the players and the owners. It's similar to what we saw happening in Wisconsin a couple of months ago. The owners are so rich that it doesn't really matter to them if they lose a season, which is why they're willing to play hardball. But they also understand that it's in their best interest to have the season and the league as a whole keep going, but of course they want it under their terms.
There is a massive nation-wide trend taking place right now where the uber rich are attempting to remove collective bargaining rights from unions of all types. Several states are experiencing this in a major way, and I would guess that we are only seeing the beginning of it. This appears to be a right-wing driven political move that has the simple goal of eroding one prominent piece of the little people's power, which the rulers view as an obstacle to their ultimate vision of America. The right wing is generally the preferred party of the ultra-wealthy business elite, and so they are using that political stance to drive the legislation through state governments that they control. But the NFL and other major league sports are desirable because the players make so much damn money. Why not channel a good chunk of that into the pockets of the owners? They probably view the players as a bunch of dumb brutes who don't deserve all that cash. Classic elite behavior
Originally posted by AnteBellum
I think they are trying to boost up the hype around the new season.
Free media attention gets everyone talking and interested.
Then they watch the money start rolling in.
Sidenote: Why can't they create a football league where the game play is incredibly violent, almost gladiator-like. The people who would play will either have to be extremely good or get hurt very fast and replaced. I like the idea of having disposable players for the most part, the NFL is starting to bore me the same thing every season.
Originally posted by dwmjr1985
reply to post by OnTheFelt
Perhaps some owners just don't want to pay for a new stadium, sense some people will still show up to a crappy one.edit on 5-5-2011 by dwmjr1985 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by gunshooter
Originally posted by AnteBellum
I think they are trying to boost up the hype around the new season.
Free media attention gets everyone talking and interested.
Then they watch the money start rolling in.
Sidenote: Why can't they create a football league where the game play is incredibly violent, almost gladiator-like. The people who would play will either have to be extremely good or get hurt very fast and replaced. I like the idea of having disposable players for the most part, the NFL is starting to bore me the same thing every season.
I think your idea absolutely rocks. we should have it that way. this should be done with a lot of sports to keep them interesting. I always thought that golf on a mine field would be entertaining to watch rather than just a boring golf game.