It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Van: MrThemastercleanser | Gemaakt op: 4 mei 2011
Coast to Coast am Where did the towers go Dr. Judy Wood 05-03-2011
Poll on bin Laden
First hour guest, author Howard Bloom reacted to our surprising Insta-Poll results on the burial of bin Laden, in which 42% of respondents said they don't believe the body was bin Laden, and that the burial at sea was part of a cover-up. He suggested this might reflect the percentage of non-Democrats who mistrust the Obama administration. A certain amount of mistrust in the government is healthy, as it represents the freedom of speech we have in this country, he added.
Originally posted by XRaDiiX
reply to post by spacevisitor
I say shes a paid dis-info agent
Originally posted by XRaDiiX
She says buildings go Poof But the fact is that most of the building you see is actually air space in between the floor and the Ceiling so yes when the building collapsed on itself from possible demolition building is going to be a somewhat small rubble pile compared to what you'd think it was because of the size of the buildings. Also when the pulverization of the building and many of the things inside the building that wasn't steel was pulverized from the Pure weight of the building falling onto its own footprint and/or self. So yes the Pulverization all that huge dust cloud you see in the Air after the building collapsed was essentially part of that Building.... Also why the Razed building pile looked somewhat small.
I do 911 was a False-Flag and possibly the Building was demolished via Thermite etc.
118 Witnesses:
The Firefighters’ Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers Graeme MacQueen August 21, 2006
Originally posted by XRaDiiX
Ok now shes mentioning John Hutchison ..... I say shes a paid dis-info agent many of the things shes stating really do not sound like they are coming from someone who has a PHD? in PHYSICS.
The way she words things just astounds me.....
I believe some people are paid by the government to try and discredit the 911 truth movement through loonery such as this...
Originally posted by Cassius666
Whatever caused burns to the surrounding area was probably inside the tower and spilled over. How come the steele kept staying hot for weeks afterwards, did the laser keep fiering? Try and talk to a physicist and have him explain to you how big such a weapon would have to be to do what she claims. I am willing to bet it would dwarf the ISS.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e285f631afb1.jpg[/atsimg]
Figure 7(a). burned NYPD car Police car I've not seen before.
Why the back end and not the front?
www.drjudywood.com...
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Cassius666
Whatever caused burns to the surrounding area was probably inside the tower and spilled over. How come the steele kept staying hot for weeks afterwards, did the laser keep fiering? Try and talk to a physicist and have him explain to you how big such a weapon would have to be to do what she claims. I am willing to bet it would dwarf the ISS.
While you're at it, would you mind explaining how controlled demolitions supposedly explains how the steel kept staying hot for weeks? Did secret agents tunnel down underground and shovel more thermite onto the steel to stoke the fires?
Hey kettle! This is the pot! You're black!
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by XRaDiiX
Ok now shes mentioning John Hutchison ..... I say shes a paid dis-info agent many of the things shes stating really do not sound like they are coming from someone who has a PHD? in PHYSICS.
The way she words things just astounds me.....
I believe some people are paid by the government to try and discredit the 911 truth movement through loonery such as this...
I don't understand...one of the major propaganda tools the conspiracy people are employing is the much repeated "thousands of PHDs and professions are disagreeing with the official story and who are we to contradict these PHD/professionals?" and yet when we have one of those very PHDs and professionals saying something YOU disagree with, you accuse her of being a secret paid disinformation agent. What makes one PHD/professional different from another PHD/professional other than that they're saying something that you yourself don't want to be true? It's the whole reason you're accusing the PHD/professionals of NIST of being secret paid disinformation agents to begin with.
Please explain to me why you conspiracy people have any credibility whatsoever.
Yes go ahead and listen to government paid dis-info agents that spout crazy ideas about energy weapons and john Hutchison proven hoaxer and he also believes he discovered anti-gravity.
I'll stick to the rest of the 911 truthers and say it was Controlled Demolition Via Thermite. Building 7.
Suckers like you guys are the ones that allow the sheeple to dis-credit truthers for falling for such Lunacy.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Cassius666
Whatever caused burns to the surrounding area was probably inside the tower and spilled over. How come the steele kept staying hot for weeks afterwards, did the laser keep fiering? Try and talk to a physicist and have him explain to you how big such a weapon would have to be to do what she claims. I am willing to bet it would dwarf the ISS.
While you're at it, would you mind explaining how controlled demolitions supposedly explains how the steel kept staying hot for weeks? Did secret agents tunnel down underground and shovel more thermite onto the steel to stoke the fires?
Hey kettle! This is the pot! You're black!
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by XRaDiiX
Ok now shes mentioning John Hutchison ..... I say shes a paid dis-info agent many of the things shes stating really do not sound like they are coming from someone who has a PHD? in PHYSICS.
The way she words things just astounds me.....
I believe some people are paid by the government to try and discredit the 911 truth movement through loonery such as this...
I don't understand...one of the major propaganda tools the conspiracy people are employing is the much repeated "thousands of PHDs and professions are disagreeing with the official story and who are we to contradict these PHD/professionals?" and yet when we have one of those very PHDs and professionals saying something YOU disagree with, you accuse her of being a secret paid disinformation agent. What makes one PHD/professional different from another PHD/professional other than that they're saying something that you yourself don't want to be true? It's the whole reason you're accusing the PHD/professionals of NIST of being secret paid disinformation agents to begin with.
Please explain to me why you conspiracy people have any credibility whatsoever.
Originally posted by Cassius666
Whatever caused burns to the surrounding area was probably inside the tower and spilled over. How come the steele kept staying hot for weeks afterwards, did the laser keep fiering? Try and talk to a physicist and have him explain to you how big such a weapon would have to be to do what she claims. I am willing to bet it would dwarf the ISS.
Also after looking her up briefly, she claims the weapon caused the wtc to end up pulverized by "molecular disassociation". So unless the weapon is incredibly precise, the collaterral damage would be additional structures in the immediate vicinity of the tower to end up pulverized as well, like the wtc and not burned out.
Tesla
Nikola Tesla (1856–1943) was a noted inventor, scientist and electrical engineer.
Tesla was noted for claiming that he had developed what he called a "teleforce" weapon, or death ray. This death ray could "send concentrated beams of particles through the free air, of such tremendous energy that they will bring down a fleet of 10,000 enemy airplanes at a distance of 250 miles (400 km) from a defending nation's border and will cause armies of millions to drop dead in their tracks", as said in an article. He offered this invention to the U.S. War Department and to several European countries without success. Various conspiracy theories persist regarding the nature of this device and the whereabouts of Tesla's model or schematics for it.