It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Osama bin Laden was unarmed when he was confronted and shot dead by US forces at his Pakistani hideout, a White House spokesman has said.
Jay Carney said that the US was considering whether to release photos of bin Laden after he was killed on Sunday but that the photos were "gruesome" and could be inflammatory.
The director of the CIA told NBC News on Tuesday that the a photo showing bin Laden dead will ultimately be released.
"The government obviously has been talking about how best to do this, but I don't think there was any question that ultimately a photograph would be presented to the public," Leon Panetta, the head of the US spy agency, said according to a transcript of the television interview.
Carney said one of bin Laden's wives had tried to rush the US forces and was shot in the leg.
He said Bin Laden had resisted capture and was shot and killed. He did not explain how bin Laden had resisted.
Originally posted by Golf66
All I have to say to this is:
Perhaps he should have armed himself if he was going to wage war with the US...?
Originally posted by Golf66
All I have to say to this is:
Perhaps he should have armed himself if he was going to wage war with the US...?
Originally posted by indisgustOBL was never indicted for 9/11, what gave them the right to just kill him?
Originally posted by Golf66
Originally posted by indisgustOBL was never indicted for 9/11, what gave them the right to just kill him?
In case you are keeping score at home - indictments are not really needed on the field of battle between two enemies.
You are thinking cops and robbers not soldier and terrorists.
Waaaay different set of rules.
Originally posted by itguysrule
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
You make a valid point but that wasn't really what I was thinking about. I was just pointing out that Bin Laden killed unarmed innocents without any hesitation. Trying to take him alive would have probably only resulted in the deaths of more good people.
Originally posted by itguysrule
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh
You make a valid point but that wasn't really what I was thinking about. I was just pointing out that Bin Laden killed unarmed innocents without any hesitation. Trying to take him alive would have probably only resulted in the deaths of more good people.