Drudge is trying extra hard to make Pres. Obama look bad today...

www.drudgereport.com...

Unfortunately, there is nothing that can make Obama look bad for calling the strike on OBL. Drudge is grasping at straws .... What a sad soul?

I am amazed at people who make it their calling in life to demean and spread disinformation about other people.
Surrounding oneself with so much negative energy cannot be good, I assume.

A candle burns the brightest before it burns out.

I'm with you, the smear machine is in full force. There is simply too much momentum now. Wow!

S&F

Sorry...double post

reply to post by Himal


[haha] i noticed that as well..

a bunch of RED text on the front page haha!

Umm the Drudge Report is just a content farm for news.

Thats like saying the events being reported as news is trying to make Obama look bad.

If you're referring to the red headlines that just means breaking news, not some biased "Obama's bad" color scheme.

reply to post by Himal


Probably because his party has a bunch of fools running for office in 2012 and there's no escaping it. Unfortunately Obama will probably be re-elected just because the other options are so god awful

reply to post by ancientmustytext


I am aware of what the red text is..

notice how they are all about Obama and the OBL kill..

just sayin

Originally posted by ancientmustytext
Umm the Drudge Report is just a content farm for news.

Thats like saying the events being reported as news is trying to make Obama look bad.

If you're referring to the red headlines that just means breaking news, not some biased "Obama's bad" color scheme.

If you don't think Drudge is biased you probably don't think Rush Limbaugh is either...

reply to post by Himal


Clarity on the OP please? I only see three red links on that page - 2 about bin Laden and one about gas.

I've looked at Drudge for probably a few weeks now and all I recall seeing is a one-line summary of the linked article. Where's the bias against Obama here?

Side note per last post - I don't listen to Limbaugh or any other political commentators myself, don't watch mainstream news channels either.

Let’s see if Obama deserves a little smear, because he has been in the past and now against everything that got us here. . Like close Gitmo, stop enhanced questioning techniques; CIA prisons abroad, the Wars, etc...
Because if he did we wouldn't have gotten Osama.
Sure glad he is so ineffective! It’s just a shame after so many things he and his supporters that were have been against so much he gets all the credit.
But those of us who have a clue know how we got here.
Drudge has right, Obama just happened to be in the right chair at the right time. Even thought it took him 16 hours to make a decision.

Lol, does it ##ss you off that not everyone-all Main Stream News Organizations are not on board with this supreme entities decisions
I for one believe in not being a hypocrite, when the U.S. feels so strongly in justifing Democracy throughout the world- "white mans burden,"

The Hypocrisy of it is LDC's, third world countries, or the Global South, will look upon the U.S. now and say, "they-U.S. is worried about our genocide, dictator,and or problems, when their restitution is to go outside the Geneva Convention and blatantly kill an individual without a trial

Ya, there is a reason why Drudge, and or other news outlets are not onboard, and that is they know what is coming down the pipe-per se, and its not good

Yesterday, in my view was for the first time that International laws-U.S. laws have been blatantly disregarded that will have detrimental Consequences for any further Constitutional validity for the people, mark my words op

Drudge must be running their bench today or something. They've screwed up at least four headlines today royally and seem to be on edge for some reason. (I stopped counting as it's pretty much par for the course...more or less.)

reply to post by allprowolfy


Don't you think there is an honest difference between not being on board and purposely trying to be negative? There are lots of things I am not on board with but to alter all my programming to specifically reflect just how very not on board I am would kind of make me feel like I must have an agenda to care so much about how not onboard I am.

Originally posted by allprowolfy
Yesterday, in my view was for the first time that International laws-U.S. laws have been blatantly disregarded that will have detrimental Consequences for any further Constitutional validity for the people, mark my words op

If I didn't know any better your post seems suggest you have regrets for the US taking out OBL and dropping him off with Sponge Bob.

Nawh, sure it's just my imagination playing tricks on me again.

Originally posted by kinda kurious

Originally posted by allprowolfy
Yesterday, in my view was for the first time that International laws-U.S. laws have been blatantly disregarded that will have detrimental Consequences for any further Constitutional validity for the people, mark my words op

If I didn't know any better your post seems suggest you have regrets for the US taking out OBL and dropping him off with Sponge Bob.

Nawh, sure it's just my imagination playing tricks on me again.

Its called DUE PROCESS, under the law, not KILL AT WILL, In a nutshell: If America wants to play the persona of Democracy, which everyone else needs to be just like us-get on board, would not killing a man without a trial be along the same lines as Hitler, Missoulini,Pol Pot,etc, and so forth!

i see nothing good coming out of this, but more executive power

Originally posted by Steve8511
Let’s see if Obama deserves a little smear, because he has been in the past and now against everything that got us here. . Like close Gitmo, stop enhanced questioning techniques; CIA prisons abroad, the Wars, etc...
Because if he did we wouldn't have gotten Osama.

Sure glad he is so ineffective! It’s just a shame after so many things he and his supporters that were have been against so much he gets all the credit.

- You are right, BUSH should get the credit for making the decision to call the strike to kill OBL.

But those of us who have a clue know how we got here.

- really, how many of you have a clue? can you elaborate on how we got here?

Drudge has right, Obama just happened to be in the right chair at the right time.

- Unlike, BUSH who for 8 (EIGHT) years, (8X365)+2 X 24 hours could not get it right.

Even thought it took him 16 hours to make a decision.

- again .. better 16 hours than 8 years of no results....

Originally posted by allprowolfy


Its called DUE PROCESS, under the law, not KILL AT WILL, In a nutshell: If America wants to play the persona of Democracy, which everyone else needs to be just like us-get on board, would not killing a man without a trial be along the same lines as Hitler, Missoulini,Pol Pot,etc, and so forth!

i see nothing good coming out of this, but more executive power

- I hope you sent this memo to OBL before 9/11/2001.

Ironic that you are now upset that we took out OBL:

Originally posted by allprowolfy
Its called DUE PROCESS, under the law, not KILL AT WILL, In a nutshell: If America wants to play the persona of Democracy, which everyone else needs to be just like us-get on board, would not killing a man without a trial be along the same lines as Hitler, Missoulini,Pol Pot,etc, and so forth!

Yet just a few weeks back you were mocking the CIA in this post

In this thread: CIA claims to be "Hot on Osama's Trail"

Originally posted by allprowolfy
after almost a decade they are hot on his trail now...truthfully we need to find another agency for the benefit of the public that can do its job and would be liable to the people and thus for the people

Why does this not even surprise me? :shk: Hypocrite much?

Originally posted by kinda kurious
Ironic that you are now upset that we took out OBL:

Originally posted by allprowolfy
Its called DUE PROCESS, under the law, not KILL AT WILL, In a nutshell: If America wants to play the persona of Democracy, which everyone else needs to be just like us-get on board, would not killing a man without a trial be along the same lines as Hitler, Missoulini,Pol Pot,etc, and so forth!

Yet just a few weeks back you were mocking the CIA in this post

In this thread: CIA claims to be "Hot on Osama's Trail"

Originally posted by allprowolfy
after almost a decade they are hot on his trail now...truthfully we need to find another agency for the benefit of the public that can do its job and would be liable to the people and thus for the people

Why does this not even surprise me? :shk: Hypocrite much?

edit on 3-5-2011 by kinda kurious because: (no reason given)

you should have posted the entirety of the post, as the jist you through out did not mention that i do not like this unfettered entity that we call the cia, but hey if it looks good on paper huh
you might want to read up a bit more on the full content of my post as i never waiver on my disdain of this military complex that we have had taken over our government
p.s twist words much

kinda just so we do not have any more problems here
1) dems and reps are one in the same.
2) msm is ran and owned by soro's and Murdoch,Rothchilds, thus our case with this thread and the reason ONE-of just a few hand full of news agencies that will not be manipulated
3) Fbi-Cia both unfettered agencies with no accountability from our Congress-ROGUE
4) not a tree hugger, but lets stick with the constitution, as it worked pretty dam well until we started worrying about everyone one elses war-MAYBE it is why our 3 founding fathers stepping down from potus told the American people to stay out of foreign conflicts, wow they where right were they not
5)ex-marine, so do not second guess my undying love for this country
enough-said