Now that they got Osama, will they go after the remaining 911 perps?

So it turns out all along that Osama was in Pakistan, in a large compound, near major Pakistan military headquarters.

Does anyone honestly believe they haven't know where he has been for some time now?

Shortly after it is announced that Petreaus will take over the CIA, and Panetta will take over as Sec of Defense, they take out Osama.

Petraeus' appointment as Director of the CIA is a new move, because the agency has always been ran by a political insider.

www.usnews.com...

That said, career spooks are already beginning to chafe at the Petraeus CIA pick. And maybe with good reason. Petraeus has little experience in intelligence, and the CIA is traditionally run by a career civilian. (Petraeus is set to resign his military post if he is confirmed.) Running Langley is no small task, and considering the role the CIA played in the run up to the Iraq war, the stakes are all that much higher.

One can only hope that this is just the beginning of a house cleaning way over due.

Of course the deeper levels of the spook community might simply wanted to get rid of Osama, because of what he knew, and what Petraeus might find out from Osama, should Petraeus get a hold of him.

I feel a change in the wind coming.

reply to post by poet1b


The house cleaning is WAAAAAY overdue, but the good thing is we don't need to be outside of the U.S. to clean them up!!

If the remaining guys all start showing up dead/captured, it either:

1. feeds into the "they knew where they/Osama were all along" storyline, or
2. they collected intel at Osama's compound, and that's how they found the rest of them so quickly.

If number 2, then people will say "yeah, right" which feeds back into number 1.

So I'll just go ahead and pick number 1 to save some time.

I would actually like them to go question the men who they have on the FBI list as the 19 hijackers responsible for 9/11 but just so happen to still be alive. They should really start there.

Apparently, the CIA has been critical of Petraeus' way of conducting the war in Afghanistan, and and his relationship with Pakistand intelligence, and military leadership isn't all that friendly.

Well, we now know that the Pakistan military was housing Osama, or else they are completely incompetent. Either way, they shouldn't be trusted.

Of course the idea, politically is to support those who maintain stability in the region, but it wouldn't be much of a leap to suggest the true reason is quite different.

www.reuters.com...

Besides Afghanistan, perhaps the biggest issue on Petraeus's agenda at the CIA will be the agency's relations with Pakistan's ISI, which over the last six months have suffered a series of grave setbacks.

"I think it is going to be a very strained and difficult relationship," said Bruce Riedel, a former adviser to President Barack Obama on Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Riedel characterized the relationship between Petraeus and Pakistani leaders as "mutual distrust."

Petraeus' relationship with Pakistan's military chief, General Ashfaq Kayani, is publicly perceived to be less than friendly and has become a topic of discussion on Pakistani TV talk shows.

Kayani last month issued a rare public condemnation of a U.S. missile strike in a Pakistani region near the Afghan border that killed more than 40 tribesmen. Last week, he said the drone strikes undermined Pakistan's own war on militants.

Still, U.S. officials told Reuters the drone program would move ahead regardless of Pakistani objections.

As commander in Afghanistan, Petraeus increased the use of air strikes but also took steps to limit civilian casualties.

But in a move unlikely to win him new friends in Islamabad, Petraeus as CIA chief is expected to renew U.S. demands that the ISI sever ties with anti-Western insurgents attacking American forces in Afghanistan -- accusations reflecting continuing deep mistrust between uneasy allies.

Petraeus won't move to the CIA until September.

reply to post by notsofunnyguy


It sure looks like a clean up operation is underway.

Look for a lot of mysterious deaths in the next four months.

There are probably a lot of very nervous associates in the neocon world.

I don't get your question- who are the "remaining 9/11 perps" we should go after that you're referring to?

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
I don't get your question- who are the "remaining 9/11 perps" we should go after that you're referring to?

edit on 2-5-2011 by GoodOlDave because: (no reason given)

Even if you believe the OS it's obvious there were more people involved than just the 19 hijackers..

Well? All they need do is go over to Bush Jr.s house and arrest him, then roll on over to Cheney's and pick him up too. That would be the 2 key perps involved in 9/11.

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
I don't get your question- who are the "remaining 9/11 perps" we should go after that you're referring to?

edit on 2-5-2011 by GoodOlDave because: (no reason given)

Even if you believe the OS it's obvious there were more people involved than just the 19 hijackers..

You mean like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed? Yes, he's already in custody and facing trial along with several other planners of the 9/11 attack. Do you mean like Mohammed Atef? He was killed in Afghanistan. There's that Egyptian doctor (forgot his name) who's supposedly the number 2 man in Al Qaida, but I don't think he was involved in the 9/11 attack per se.

So who are the remaining 9/11 perps we need to go after? He posted the question but only started referencing umbrage of intel spooks over Patraeus taking over the CIA.

Im fairly sure that they are going to focus a lot on getting the new worlds most wanted terrorsist, Ayman Al-zawahiri, zawahiri is the strategic leader of al qaeda and was behind a lot more than bin laden

reply to post by GoodOlDave


That would be the people in the U.S. government who allowed all this to go down. Anyone who bothered to learn anything after 9-11 knows that the official story is hogwash.

The roles that GW and Cheney played are highly questionable. And from there on down in the GW admin, there are a lot of people probably involved in the whole planning stage of this event.

While 9-11 wasn't the first false flag operation, the huge numbers of civilian deaths, combined with with the questionable motives for the wars started afterward, make this one of the most heinous of crimes committed against the people of the U.S..

All physical evidence points to the buildings taken out on 9-11 having been done in a controlled demolition, which means pre-planning, which means that a core group in the U.S. must have been involved.

Of course there is the group or groups who bet against airline stocks, and other strange stock market moves, where anonymous groups made huge amounts of money on that fateful day, blood money.

If yo don't know about this, then you should look into it. There is a wealth of research material available right here on ATS.

Originally posted by Whereweheaded
Well? All they need do is go over to Bush Jr.s house and arrest him, then roll on over to Cheney's and pick him up too. That would be the 2 key perps involved in 9/11.

Spoken like a true Alex Jones acolyte. You'll forgive me when I say the rest of the non damned fool conspiracy web site following world require more proof of their involvement than just abject paranoia.

reply to post by GoodOlDave


And what about the very large group of engineers and scientist in the truther movement who point out that the official explanation is impossible, and that all evidence points to a controlled demolition?

Some people will believe anything they are told.

Anyone who bothers to engage their brain, and takes a look at what happened, knows those planes did not take out the towers, or the other building, nor hit the Pentagon. The engineering facts that prove this beyond a reasonable doubt are extremely solid, and backed by a large number of very reputable engineers and scientist.

Originally posted by poet1b
That would be the people in the U.S. government who allowed all this to go down. Anyone who bothered to learn anything after 9-11 knows that the official story is hogwash.

The roles that GW and Cheney played are highly questionable. And from their on down in the GW admin, there are a lot of people probably involved in the whole planning stage of this event.

Questionable as in how their capacity as blithering idiots affected the events of 9/11 or questionable as in claiming a pair of blithering idiots somehow managed to figure out how to stage the most brilliant and near-supernaturally flawless conspiracy in all of recorded human history?

Just because someone intensely wants to believe something preposterous is true it in no way means it has to be true. If that's the case then Jennifer Anniston and Marisa Tomei must be fighting each other over which one can sleep with me.

All physical evidence points to the buildings taken out on 9-11 having been done in a controlled demolition, which means pre-planning, which means that a core group in the U.S. must have been involved.

No, actually, there is zero physical evidence pointing to the buildings being taken out by controlled demolitions. If there was even a microbe of said proof, you conspiracy people wouldn't need to be resorting to grasp at ridiculous straws like inferring that Condi Rice had an oil tanker named after her or Bush having links to Hitler via five degrees of separation, "Kevin Bacon" games.

Of course there is the group or groups who bet against airline stocks, and other strange stock market moves, where anonymous groups made huge amounts of money.

Please explain to me how someone can make huge amounts of money in the stock market by driving a company into bankruptcy. Either you have discovered some amazing investment method that violates the laws of capitalism, or you're just mindlessly quoting some damned fool conspiracy website somewhere and you really don't know what you're talking about.

reply to post by GoodOlDave


There wasn't anything brilliant about pulling off 9-11, people have been pointing out the huge flaws in the official report from the beginning. That nothing has been done about it only goes to prove that the people of the U.S. have lost control of our government, and haven't had any, but the weakest control, since Kennedy was assassinated. All evidence points to a CIA takeover of the Exec branch since that point in time.

You never heard of shorting a stock, allowing gamblers (er investors) to bet against a company and make money?

That you would have to ask this question clearly demonstrates you lack of understanding of the realities of this world.

When the "other" perps are having lunch at the white house they shouldn't be hard to find
the whitehouse did 911
which is why they are fighting together to steal gahdaffi's oil and money now

EXCLUSIVE: Al Qaeda Leader Dined at the Pentagon Just Months After 9/11

www.foxnews.com...

of course you have Anwar al whats his name confessing to blowing up buildings that weren't even built till AFTER he was IMPRISONED...

jeeze

oh yeah, and then that woman who warned the CIA about the incomeing strike and was thown in prison and told she could have her trial when she was released...

yep, they hate you for that freedom
heh heh ehe whoooo...


now eat your flouride

Originally posted by GoodOlDave

Originally posted by Whereweheaded
Well? All they need do is go over to Bush Jr.s house and arrest him, then roll on over to Cheney's and pick him up too. That would be the 2 key perps involved in 9/11.

Spoken like a true Alex Jones acolyte. You'll forgive me when I say the rest of the non damned fool conspiracy web site following world require more proof of their involvement than just abject paranoia.

Oh your one of those huh? If you buy into the OS thats your prerogative. Since there haven't been any formal charges against the alleged jackers, and yet to many unexplained coincidences have occurred, why not prove that they aren't guilty of war profiteering.


You do know that the company that is in Cheney's back pocket known as halliburton was one of the first awarded contracts in Iraq/Afghanistan right? You think that was pure luck?

With your logic, the earth is still flat!

alex jones bought silver when it was real cheap and made a huge profit for himself
and his listeners did too...

those who bought the official story have mortgages that are under water,
and a dollar thats under ground...
and if they are on the payroll of the government program that was announced to spread disinfo on forums and in the media they are getting paid in dollars that are devaluing faster then they can collect them

while the UBERperps sold airlines stocks short and did other insider type things and made kajillions
and got laws passed to put themselves above the law
now whos your damn daddy now?

case closed

Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Spoken like a true Alex Jones acolyte. You'll forgive me when I say the rest of the non damned fool conspiracy web site following world require more proof of their involvement than just abject paranoia.

What level of fact do you require? Is copious quantities of hi-end thermate enough to convince you of a domestic connection? How about a crime scene sanitized in record time without an investigation of the physical evidence? Do you believe for one minute that WTC7, a heavily secured building, could be wired by Arab "terrorists"?

I know .... I know ..... there are a bunch of people who are really comfortable being asleep or being a sheep. If you don't fit that category maybe you should go here and educate yourself:

www.ae911truth.org...