It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ShellyBoo
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
Harper said he would cut crime, he did, Harper said he would cut tax, he did(by 1%) Sad thing is Harper still wants to put our money towards prison, and all he talk about is the economy..They always get the main campaign done, harper keeps saying the same tired BS..Jack Layton wants health care to be improved, he has my vote I hope he gets that done because its at the top of his to do list, which is usually the one that does get done, I just wish liberals and conservatives stop using Jack Laytons 4 year 65 billion dollar platform against him, considering Harper spent over a Billion dollars on the G20, wich only lasted a day or 2, Harper needs out hes nothing but a bully and the younger generations see that and are sick of his tired politics! and if you say its all the same in the end, wouldnt it be worth it to see a new face?
Originally posted by ShellyBoo
reply to post by jude11
When he first got elected how many years ago, he did that as soon as he got voted in...
Originally posted by Radekus
reply to post by ShellyBoo
I second that.
Harper did lower taxes when he got elected.edit on 29-4-2011 by Radekus because: (no reason given)
The designs of "deep integration" are reflected in your interest in purchasing F-35 fighter jets (already estimated at $29 billion by a Parliamentary office) that has no Canadian defence rationale but serves to help bail out the Pentagon's procurement mess with Lockheed-Martin's delayed, troubled and way over budget aircraft.
Once the U.S. government’s national security scaffolding surrounds Canada, many policy matters will become “national security” priorities. Canadian energy, water, the Canadian Arctic, anti-monopoly enforcement, and Canadian foreign investment policies could be subsumed under “national security” imperatives.
Originally posted by Radekus
reply to post by jude11
Where do you expect the government to make it's money from? They're not taxing corporations like they should be, and they privatized natural resource exploitation as well as support companies like Monsanto. Who else are they gonna tax but the population, watch for food shortages, monopolies like to play the market to make more money, expect Monsanto (and similar competitive farming corporations) to do the same. End effect? Everyday food prices will soar through the roof. it's already happening, noticed prices of food going up lately?edit on 29-4-2011 by Radekus because: (no reason given)edit on 29-4-2011 by Radekus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Radekus
Who to vote for?
Conservatives?
Neoliberals that benefit the super rich, and US business.
Liberals?
Corrupt Neoliberals that benefit themselves (cause they steal money), the super rich, and US business.
Green party?
Crypto Neoliberals that benefit the super rich, and US business and use the word green
as a propaganda tool for environmentalist voter sway.
Bloc Quebecois?
Xenophobic racists, at least they have a notion of developing local businesses,
even if it's french related...
NDP?
Ran by inexperienced kids, immigrants and leftists with no realistic notion of economics...
Pick your choice... hahahaha.
"Percy Schmeiser was mad as hell, and decided he wasn't going to take it. Schmeiser has been growing canola -- the yellow-blossomed oilseed that used to be known as rapeseed -- for 40 years, and he knows his stuff. He's been experimenting, developing his own varieties, using his own seed and generally prospering with canola. reaping the benefits derived from growing an increasingly popular crop. So when Monsanto, the giant multinational agro-chemical company that is at the forefront of developing genetically modified foods, accused him of patent infringement and demanded restitution for its seeds, his pride was hurt. He chose to fight rather than roll over and take it."