It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

More Lies!!...U.S. says Gaddafi troops raping, issued Viagra...

page: 1
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 10:57 PM
link   

SO HERES ANOTHER LIE THEY ARE FEEDING EVERYONE TO MAKE THEIR REASONS FOR WAR NOT SEEM TOTALLY RIDICULAS...



I cannot take these ridiculas lies anymore! Made up nonsense to make the reasons for War with Libya seem necassary...That country was by far one of the smallest risks to America and most of the rest of the coalition forces. Thos whole conflict was and is based on lies...Thats why I cant stand these governmaents...It makes me shake my head in discuss when I hear some of these excuses for a WAR/CONFLICT with Libya...Now theyre just going to piss off other countries that they will actually have to worry about over their BS...I just hope that those people that are dying and wikk be dying because of the BS will soon come to an end but I know this is nothing more than false hope...This time in all of our lives seems to be a hopeless moment or at least thats how I feel about it...


Reuters) - The U.S. envoy to the United Nations told the Security Council on Thursday that troops loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi were increasingly engaging in sexual violence and some had been issued the impotency drug Viagra, diplomats said.Several U.N. diplomats who attended a closed-door Security Council meeting on Libya told Reuters that U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice raised the Viagra issue in the context of increasing reports of sexual violence by Gaddafi's troops."Rice raised that in the meeting but no one responded," a diplomat said on condition of anonymity. The allegation was first reported by a British newspaper.


Diplomats said if it were true that Gaddafi's troops were being issued Viagra, it could indicate they were being encouraged by their commanders to engage in rape to terrorize the population in areas that have supported the rebels. That would constitute a war crime.Several diplomats said Rice provided no evidence for the Viagra allegation, which they said was made in an attempt to persuade doubters the conflict in Libya was not just a standard civil war but a much nastier fight in which Gaddafi is not afraid to order his troops to commit heinous acts.Rice's statement, diplomats said, was aimed principally at countries like India, Russia and China, which have grown increasingly skeptical of the effectiveness of the NATO-led air strikes, which they fear have turned the conflict into a protracted civil war that will cause many civilian deaths.
...ARTICLE



edit on 28-4-2011 by gdaub23 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:08 PM
link   
It's just becoming comical now with these politicians. What absolute nonsense is this? I'm no pro Gadaffi but if this viagra story is true I'll eat my hat.

It's all about profiting from this war. All those politicians with stocks in haliburton are making sure the US expenditure in Libya is maximized. If they wanted immediate change in Libya they would have assassinated Gadaffi from the get go. It's all about the money.



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:15 PM
link   
reply to post by gdaub23
 


The glaring and obvious misinfo in this so-called fact is that you don't need viagra to rape unless they are suggesting that viagra makes you rape. If you don't want to rape someone, taking viagra isn't going to make you want to. On the same side of the token, why would someone who is willing to rape need viagra?

What a bunch of bull. It wasn't enough to say that there was raping going on but they HAD to throw in that they were being required to take this drug to facilitate the disgusting acts.



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:16 PM
link   
reply to post by gdaub23
 


Well, you've presented one article and the claims from anonymous "diplomats" but nothing more than that to corroborate/refute this story? I guess the bias flows both ways, hmmm?

edit on 28-4-2011 by ladyskadi because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:16 PM
link   
Its so easy to see through the lies these days. Either I'm getting wiser or they're getting dumber. ?



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:19 PM
link   
hmm. based solely on the wording of the Rueters article, I would say she was riffing and wen overboard trying to convince the diplomats. I would not believe a word of it, really.



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:24 PM
link   
If there is even the chance of that, I'd be willing to investigate it that's a very serious accusation.



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:25 PM
link   
reply to post by gdaub23
 


Yeah i had a hard time believing this myself.
I really dont believe they issue viagra how would that work?? Here you go troops heres your gun oh and bullets and for you guys that cant rape and pillage be sure to stop by the pharmacy and get viagra??? Not to mention how in the world would you even verify this. I believe this was started my some one who wants Muslims to appear devout and Qaddafi forces to appear godless because something else i noticed today was this release:



Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri was captured in November 2002 after becoming one of the terrorist cell's most senior members with strong links to Osama bin Laden. During interrogations at CIA camps he is said to have confessed to injecting himself with the powerful chemicals to stop himself being distracted by women.


Weird that these two thing were released on the same day isnt it?



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:26 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:26 PM
link   
So...big pharma is now part of the military-industrial complex? LMAO!

I'm not really buying the whole sexual assault angle on this (no offense to you OP, I know you're just providing the article). But, even if it were true, soldiers for thousands of years haven't needed a pill to get them frisky after battle; the battle itself was enough!



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:32 PM
link   
reply to post by ladyskadi
 


no the OP is right. this as turned into a all out bona fide war. This could get real messy real fast.



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:34 PM
link   
reply to post by SkipperJohn
 


Some would say the war is already "messy" but that is not my point, nor what I was addressing to the OP.



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:39 PM
link   
Heres two more for you.
www.nytimes.com...



Syria: U.N. Atomic Watchdog Director Says Bombed Syrian Site Was Reactor

The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said Thursday that a target destroyed by Israeli warplanes in the Syrian desert in 2007 was a covertly built nuclear reactor, countering assertions by Syria. The United States has said the target was a reactor, and previous reports by the nuclear watchdog had suggested that it could have been. At a news conference in Paris on Friday, the agency’s director, Yukiya Amano, said the facility was “a nuclear reactor under construction.” The agency later issued a statement saying it had not concluded “that the site was definitely a nuclear reactor,” suggesting Mr. Amano’s comments did not reflect official policy.


Disinfo that was later corrected but the thought is already in many peoples head Syria had a nuclear reactor.

english.people.com.cn...




France uses unexplosive bombs in Libya

France has started this week to use unexplosive bombs to strike targets on the ground in Libya in the hope to reduce unnecessary damage to nearby civil infrastructures and civilians, the military's spokesman Thierry Burkhard said on Thursday.

At a press conference, Burkhard said the unexplosive bombs, around 300 kilograms and stuffed with concrete mass instead of explosives, have been adopted since Tuesday to hit vehicles of Libya force loyal to Muammar Gaddafi.

The purpose to use concrete bombs was to increase accuracy of each strike and reduce unnecessary damage, he said, denying that the air operation in Libya by the foreign coalition was running short of aircraft or munitions.


Poor NATO and France and even Britain can't come up with the bombs they need because evil Obama wont give them anymore so now they have to use concrete?

edit on Sat Apr 30 2011 by DontTreadOnMe because: IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:47 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Apr, 28 2011 @ 11:50 PM
link   
I can hardly believe this myself...
Viagra a WMD
?
Only in America

as seen on TV
edit on 28-4-2011 by Danbones because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 12:21 AM
link   
richardbrenneman.wordpress.com...

Check out this link above...shows how the only real documented massacre is that of the rebels massacring black africans..totally sick and disgusting. I won't post any of the video's on youtube because I can't even believe they are on youtube but there are actual videos of these massacres and some of public executions being done by these rebels where they decapitate the dead victim. Only watch it if you can it is extremely sick and disgusting and very difficult to watch



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 12:34 AM
link   
Thats funny, passing out viagra.
I really don't think anyone will buy this statement at all. Maybe the peoples trying to make money off this, need some of this viagra. I'm sure it will give them plenty of joy, even with the strap on.
Whoever wrote that, obviously, is an idiot.



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 05:13 PM
link   
Where is the proof that this isn't true? What you have presented is evidence that it COULD be true. Then call it a lie without any basis in fact.



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 05:43 PM
link   
Star and flag for you my friend. It didn't resonate as truth to me either. First they tried to make him look bad when they killed the Gadaffi loyal soldiers as "mercenaries", nwo (now, yes mispelling is intentional) they try to sell this Viagra/rape story to the weak.



posted on Apr, 29 2011 @ 08:37 PM
link   
reply to post by gdaub23
 


I agree they are ridiculous, and it was stated by a us envoy? she has no proof to back up the claims,which is nuts, the Americans are using the same lies they used agaisnt the serbs in Bosnia, the claim back then was that 60,000 then the number went to down to 50,000 that claim was that the serb soldiers raped Muslim women, yet they have no proof to back up the claim.


I am not surprised they used the same claims as they did in bosnia, i guess history does repeat itself.


S&F op



new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join