It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BenReclused
Where you got the idea means nothing to me, it's what you did with it that is telling! You are just as closed minded as those that still do "proudly" display the Confederate flag on their vehicles. I've seen a lot of them in the North too!
See ya,
Milt
Originally posted by truthseeker1984
reply to post by buskey
This is the best news I have heard all day. WBC was scheduled to come to my town a few months back, and the word got out quickly in my community. The morning of the funeral, thousands of people lined the streets to greet the family and the body of the fallen soldier. Turns out that WBC had indeed shown up, but when they found out how many people were there, they turned tail and got back on the highway. They never even left the hotel that they were staying at.
Thanks for the uplifting news. It's good to see that, at least in some parts of the country, ignorance is being denied.
I can't see where your from but that happened where I live too. A few months back, the people of the town wrangled all the WBC people away from the service They left without incident. La Plata, White Plains, Waldorf, and all parts of Southern MD. Great folks!
Peace be with you.
-truthseeker
Originally posted by Buddha1098
reply to post by BenReclused
I could be wrong of course, but the overwhelming evidence, albeit circumstantial is that these people were brought in for questioning about a crime the police knew they did not commit.
In fact, the WBC people are the only people who did nothing LEGALLY wrong in this case.edit on 20-4-2011 by Buddha1098 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Buddha1098
reply to post by BenReclused
So in your opinion the manipulation of the law to infringe on the WBC's first amendment rights is justified and correct? It's okay to infringe on constitutional rights to protect someone's feelings?
Originally posted by kinnerarity
How do you know? Were you there? Maybe they damaged private property by driving on the grass to go around the cars that were slow to be towed? Isn't that a crime? They arrived someway...............
Technically, they did not prevent them from speaking. They just delayed them on their way a little. I see your point, but personally, Im glad it happened, and I think it was a very clever and rather peaceful methodology that was used.
Originally posted by Buddha1098
reply to post by kinnerarity
Sorry you're wrong.. Laws against hate speech are illegal in the US.
Terminiello v. Chicago (1949), Yates v. United States (1957), Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969).edit on 20-4-2011 by Buddha1098 because: (no reason given)
Whoa... Biblical? I encourage you to read the bible in it's original language if you think their message is biblical.
§ 42.01. DISORDERLY CONDUCT. (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly:
(1) uses abusive, indecent, profane, or vulgar language in a public place, and the language by its very utterance tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace;
(2) makes an offensive gesture or display in a public place, and the gesture or display tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace;
(3) creates, by chemical means, a noxious and unreasonable odor in a public place;
(4) abuses or threatens a person in a public place in an obviously offensive manner;