posted on Apr, 20 2011 @ 02:43 AM
(All quotes noted below are easily found via Google – please do your own homework)
First, let’s establish a couple of facts about Obama.
1 – Regarding Obama, John Boehner stated: “I think he's engaging,” “Certainly smart. Brilliant. …”
2 – Regarding Obama’s citizenship: Boehner said that he believes that Obama was born in Hawaii and that the president is a Christian.
(These points come into play later)
Now, let’s look at the differences between the Tea Party and the Republican Party potential candidates. Without doubt, the Tea Party favorites (in
no particular order) are: Trump, Bachman, and Palin. The problem here (I believe) is that the Republican Party sees them all as unelectable and
won’t support them when push comes to shove. Here’s why:
1 - “The Donald” Trump – Trump is most likely going to push his business experience and suggest that this is the way Government has to be run.
However, the American people understand that there is a big difference between the two and have rejected that approach before (Ross Perot). Simply
put, stock holders only care about profits, American voters care about many different things, some of which conflict with one another – a tightrope
he’s never had to consider walking. In addition to the fact that he has little to offer in actual political experience, he’s decided to hitch his
wagon to the “Birther” movement. The problem there is that a majority of Americans do not support “Birther’s” views, and further, the items
Trump is bringing up are old and have already been debunked which makes him look like he’s way behind the curve.
>Republican viewpoint = not electable.
2 – Michelle Bachman – “we also know that the very founders that wrote those documents worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United
States.” (That alone is SO big a mistake it cannot be attributed to a “misspoken moment”). "Literally, if we took away the minimum wage—if
conceivably it was gone—we could potentially virtually wipe out unemployment completely because we would be able to offer jobs at whatever level."
(Keep going, what happens then?) “I find it interesting that it was back in 1970 that the swine flu broke out then under another Democrat president
Jimmy Carter. And I’m not blaming President Obama. I just think it’s an interesting coincidence.” (And your point is?) -These comments were
made when she *wasn’t* under any pressure. Imagine what she might come up with while in a televised national debate with Obama where she would have
to answer hard-nosed questions and provide back up right then and there…
>Republican viewpoint = Dumb and not electable.
3 – Sarah Palin – Just Google up “Palinisms”. Not only does she show consistent missteps, she doesn’t even have the sense to hire smart
handlers to coach her about when not to speak, and what to limit her comments to when she does speak. But more importantly, she walked away from
office and the general public will never forget about her being a “quitter”. Is anyone really willing to take that chance with the Presidency?
Like Bachman, a televised debate against Obama (who’s already been characterized as “smart” and “brilliant”) would be like witnessing the
clubbing of baby seals. Whereas Obama *can* think on his feet when pressed, Palin (like Bachman) can only say they *have* feet.
>Republican viewpoint = Dumb and not electable.
Who then would Republicans support for the nomination? To me, the most likely candidates are Gingrich and Romney. While both have at least one piece
of significant baggage they carry, this can be overlooked if they coherently send the message of the party (which they can), and most importantly,
they actually can think on their feet and therefore could stand toe to toe with Obama in a debate.
But, here’s the problem: The Tea Partiers are already are grousing about the Republicans taking a soft line against the Democrats on budget issues,
and this will continue when debates about debt limit and 2012 budget talks begin. By the time the nominations come around, the idea of the Republicans
not supporting their candidates will be seen by the Tea Partiers as the ultimate act of betrayal. In response, the Tea Partiers will probably flex
their political muscle and choose not to support the Republican candidates. In short, on Election Day – they will stay home.
This will hand a potentially close race to Obama.