It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Also, same as if a cop smells burning pot and can enter your home. Open discovery and destruction of evidence.
Originally posted by CosmosKid
I wonder how these scanners are applied procedure wise? Is it a matter of the police having to ask for access to the phone BEFORE they can use it or does the damn thing just scan you phone from a distance without actually being attached to your phone using TEMPEST technology
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
reply to post by macman
Also, same as if a cop smells burning pot and can enter your home. Open discovery and destruction of evidence.
Theres a difference, if he smells pot thats probable cause to search........
But walking up and down cars at a stoplight ? I dont see how thats legal, when its not a designated point
Originally posted by Cryptonomicon
Simple: Keep a "spare" cell phone in your car which is used *only* for these instances. Tell the cop you forgot to pay your phone bill so it may or may not currently be able to make calls. Keep some stupid photos in there, pulled off the internet with geotags that locate themselves in Antarctica.
Make sure it stays in "airplane mode" all the time.
"Sure officer, here's my cell phone. Have at it!"edit on 20-4-2011 by Cryptonomicon because: tidbit
Originally posted by CosmosKid
I wonder how these scanners are applied procedure wise? Is it a matter of the police having to ask for access to the phone BEFORE they can use it or does the damn thing just scan you phone from a distance without actually being attached to your phone using TEMPEST technology
Originally posted by HispanicPanic
WOW. this is COMPLETE AND UTTER BULL$4!T!!! if i got pulled over and they asked to see my phone its going to be an INSTANT NO. and i have NOTHING to hide. as a matter of fact, if i get pulled over and they ask to see my phone i will pull out a small tupperware bowl of water and instantly drop my entire phone inside of it while its on, take it out break it into as many pieces as i can and say here now you can see it. THAN i would sue the crap out of this state and make the entire case WOLRDWIDE. this world really is going to CRAP
and for the record, i live 5 mins outside of lansing...edit on 19-4-2011 by HispanicPanic because: (no reason given)
April 20, 2011 - Official Statement: Use of Cell Phone Data Extraction Devices
Contact: Tiffany Brown, Public Affairs Section, (517) 241-0970
Agency: State Police
LANSING. Recent news coverage prompted by a press release issued by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has brought speculation and caused inaccurate information to be reported about data extraction devices (DEDs) owned by the Michigan State Police (MSP).
To be clear, there have not been any allegations of wrongdoing by the MSP in the use of DEDs. The MSP only uses the DEDs if a search warrant is obtained or if the person possessing the mobile device gives consent.
The department*s internal directive is that the DEDs only be used by MSP specialty teams on criminal cases, such as crimes against children. The DEDs are not being used to extract citizens' personal information during routine traffic stops.
The MSP does not possess DEDs that can extract data without the officer actually possessing the owner's mobile device. The DEDs utilized by the MSP cannot obtain information from mobile devices without the mobile device owner knowing.
Data extraction devices are commercially available and are routinely utilized by mobile communication device vendors nationwide to transmit data from one device to another when customers upgrade their mobile devices. These DEDs have been adapted for law enforcement use due to the ever-increasing use of mobile communication devices by criminals to further their criminal activity and have become a powerful investigative tool used to obtain critical information from criminals.
Since 2008, the MSP has worked with the ACLU to narrow the focus, and thus reducing the cost, of its initial Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. To date, the MSP has fulfilled at least one ACLU FOIA request on this issue and has several far-lower cost requests awaiting payment to begin processing. The MSP provides information in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act. As with any request, there may be a processing fee to search for, retrieve, review, examine, and separate exempt material, if any.
The implication by the ACLU that the MSP uses these devices "quietly to bypass Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches" is untrue, and this divisive tactic unjustly harms police and community relations.
Originally posted by angrywhitechick
The Michigan State Police issued an official statement today about the use of DEDs
April 20, 2011 - Official Statement: Use of Cell Phone Data Extraction Devices
Contact: Tiffany Brown, Public Affairs Section, (517) 241-0970
Agency: State Police
The MSP only uses the DEDs if a search warrant is obtained or if the person possessing the mobile device gives consent.