It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.guardian.co.uk...
Fascist America, in 10 easy steps
From Hitler to Pinochet and beyond, history shows there are certain steps that any would-be dictator must take to destroy constitutional freedoms.
...
1. Invoke a terrifying internal and external enemy
...
2. Create a gulag
Once you have got everyone scared, the next step is to create a prison system outside the rule of law (as Bush put it, he wanted the American detention centre at Guantánamo Bay to be situated in legal "outer space") - where torture takes place.
...
3. Develop a thug caste
When leaders who seek what I call a "fascist shift" want to close down an open society, they send paramilitary groups of scary young men out to terrorise citizens. The Blackshirts roamed the Italian countryside beating up communists; the Brownshirts staged violent rallies throughout Germany. This paramilitary force is especially important in a democracy: you need citizens to fear thug violence and so you need thugs who are free from prosecution.
...
4. Set up an internal surveillance system
In Mussolini's Italy, in Nazi Germany, in communist East Germany, in communist China - in every closed society - secret police spy on ordinary people and encourage neighbours to spy on neighbours. The Stasi needed to keep only a minority of East Germans under surveillance to convince a majority that they themselves were being watched.
...
5. Harass citizens' groups
...
6. Engage in arbitrary detention and release
This scares people.
...
7. Target key individuals
Threaten civil servants, artists and academics with job loss if they don't toe the line. Mussolini went after the rectors of state universities who did not conform to the fascist line; so did Joseph Goebbels, who purged academics who were not pro-Nazi; so did Chile's Augusto Pinochet; so does the Chinese communist Politburo in punishing pro-democracy students and professors.
...
8. Control the press
...
9. Dissent equals treason
...
10. Suspend the rule of law
Originally posted by civilchallenger
Originally posted by SeventhSeal
Honestly, maybe he should've minded his own business. The guy should've known better than to mess with NY cops.
Thats right, blame the victim. If someone gets raped, next time they'll know better than to dress in a short skirt or wear makeup on their face. If you don't self-mutilate your face, you should know better than to walk outside after 6PM and deserve the rapes you've got coming. Right?
In point of fact he did not "mess with NY cops"... he was joking about them. Big difference. And if he didn't do that we wouldn't realizing what pond scum they are, so I'm glad he heroically shed some light on the situation. Most big-city cops are like that... authoritarian sadistic monsters.edit on 16-4-2011 by civilchallenger because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Misterlondon
Originally posted by watchitburn
arrested for being black on a friday night.
2nd line
yeah...by a black police officer..
so your point if indeed you are trying to make one is complete nonsense...
House Negro (also House Nigger) is a pejorative term for a black person, used to compare someone to a house slave of a slave owner from the historic period of legal slavery in the US. The term comes from a speech, Message to the Grass Roots, given by African American activist Malcolm X, where he explains that during slavery, there were two kinds of slaves: "house Negroes," who worked in the master's house and "field Negroes," who performed the manual labor outside. He characterizes the house Negro as having a better life than the field Negro, and thus unwilling to leave the plantation, and potentially more likely to support existing power structures that favor whites over blacks.
Originally posted by daddio
reply to post by GreatScot
Here is a good link for this guy to file a complaint against the officers involved...
www.fbi.gov...
I think everyone should save this link and file complaints so we get the message out that we are not gonna take this crap anymore!!
Originally posted by badw0lf
Originally posted by NWOnoworldorder
reply to post by fordrew
i didnt see them arresting him for making a joke, i heard them telling him that the situation was nothing to do with him and to just keep moving, he then said " i wasnt talking to u"! then the police officer got out the car and asked him repeatedly for his ID and he wouldnt do it...
so had he just handed over his id when asked then it wouldnt have escalated into that....
however the amount of police on the scene was rather excessive....
Good point -
Papers now.
Why?
Papers NOW jew.
What for?
Bang bang.. *squirt squirt*
Deserved it, haha lets carry on shall we? Goodbye jew..
... Yup, good point.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by NWOnoworldorder
Well, you sound reasonable when you say he should have just handed over his ID, but then that brings us to the whole point of authorities demanding to see our papers(ID) any old time.That really does smack of Nazi Germany and we all know it.
Originally posted by NWOnoworldorder
agreed, and the non-compliant one is the one who was arrested.
Originally posted by NWOnoworldorder
Originally posted by badw0lf
Originally posted by NWOnoworldorder
reply to post by fordrew
i didnt see them arresting him for making a joke, i heard them telling him that the situation was nothing to do with him and to just keep moving, he then said " i wasnt talking to u"! then the police officer got out the car and asked him repeatedly for his ID and he wouldnt do it...
so had he just handed over his id when asked then it wouldnt have escalated into that....
however the amount of police on the scene was rather excessive....
Good point -
Papers now.
Why?
Papers NOW jew.
What for?
Bang bang.. *squirt squirt*
Deserved it, haha lets carry on shall we? Goodbye jew..
... Yup, good point.
am i the only one in this thread that actually watched and listened to what was going on in that video....
u mention papers..yes the officer asked for his id..HOWEVER before he asked for his id the officer warned him from the car to just move on and dont get involved at which the "victim" (and i use that loosley) was belligerent and shouted at the officer...AND ONLY THEN when the officer got out the car did he ask for his ID....
isnt it normal practice to ask for id? so the officer knows with whom hes dealing? so that he can radio headquarters and find out if there are any warrants? in the uk they do....normal practice.
the man brought it on himself he should have kept moving instead of backchatting after he was warned....
so yuh...good point
Originally posted by badw0lf
Originally posted by NWOnoworldorder
agreed, and the non-compliant one is the one who was arrested.
And what was his crime? Walking past, having a jab at the guy on the bike? Did the guy on the bike say he wanted justice for it?
Do you hear the hypocrisy? He was walking past, committed no offense and the cop didn't like this - so on his own merit he decided to check this guys ID. No Reason. None.
As others have said he may have known him, but bull - why then request his ID.
The cop was power mad. Simple.
yea ive already replied to your last post....im not repeating myself ..i suggest u watch the video again and this time actually digest what is said and done....
Police do not get to just ask random people for their ID in places they are LEGALLY allowed to be in.
Ugh, what a crap world it must be where you live, if you think this is OK.
Ironic name you have...
Originally posted by badw0lf
Originally posted by NWOnoworldorder
Originally posted by badw0lf
Originally posted by NWOnoworldorder
reply to post by fordrew
i didnt see them arresting him for making a joke, i heard them telling him that the situation was nothing to do with him and to just keep moving, he then said " i wasnt talking to u"! then the police officer got out the car and asked him repeatedly for his ID and he wouldnt do it...
so had he just handed over his id when asked then it wouldnt have escalated into that....
however the amount of police on the scene was rather excessive....
Good point -
Papers now.
Why?
Papers NOW jew.
What for?
Bang bang.. *squirt squirt*
Deserved it, haha lets carry on shall we? Goodbye jew..
... Yup, good point.
am i the only one in this thread that actually watched and listened to what was going on in that video....
u mention papers..yes the officer asked for his id..HOWEVER before he asked for his id the officer warned him from the car to just move on and dont get involved at which the "victim" (and i use that loosley) was belligerent and shouted at the officer...AND ONLY THEN when the officer got out the car did he ask for his ID....
isnt it normal practice to ask for id? so the officer knows with whom hes dealing? so that he can radio headquarters and find out if there are any warrants? in the uk they do....normal practice.
the man brought it on himself he should have kept moving instead of backchatting after he was warned....
so yuh...good point
WHAT CRIME DID HE COMMIT?
When you answer that, I'll reconsider a response.
Originally posted by badw0lf
reply to post by NWOnoworldorder
If your inability to quote is as good as how you interpret law, good luck with that.