It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by samkent
You obviously don’t do any research. It’s no wonder you believe in conspiracies.
There was an audit where the military couldn’t account for 2.3 trillion in spending. The money was spent just not accounted for. I don’t know over what period of time the audit was for. But clearly it was for more than 1 year.
This is such old news.
Originally posted by samkent
You obviously don’t do any research. It’s no wonder you believe in conspiracies.
There was an audit where the military couldn’t account for 2.3 trillion in spending. The money was spent just not accounted for. I don’t know over what period of time the audit was for. But clearly it was for more than 1 year.
This is such old news.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Apparently, you mean to say that as long as it was spent its OK.
2.3 Trillion doesn't EVER get to be "old" news.... sorry... that's not your decision to make.
Originally posted by samkent
"You obviously don’t do any research. It’s no wonder you believe in conspiracies."
so... why are you one this site, then? You are obviously so far above the fray, you would never buy into these silly "conspiracy theories." You only come here to make fun of us geeks?
"There was an audit where the military couldn’t account for 2.3 trillion in spending."
...and that's a good thing why?
"The money was spent just not accounted for."
Right, I don't think that anyone is suggesting that the money was tossed in the trash or used to wipe butts. The problem isn't that the money was or was not used, it's that we have NO CLUE what it was used for. A moderate amount of "black budget" is to be expected, but when it's literally YEARS worth or funds that just got spent and not tracked, that's a problem. a BIG problem. How can the Pentagon, responsible for so much planning and operations, be using decades old systems, all incompatible with each other? they invented the internet, for god's sake!
"I don’t know over what period of time the audit was for."
So, you don't do your research, either?
"But clearly it was for more than 1 year."
Which agrees completely with what the OP said. Several YEARS worth of funding have been spent and no one seems to know or care on what.
"This is such old news."
So why did you click on the link, read the post AND take the time to post a (superfluous) reply? If you're over this, and you really don't care and think it's just some stupid conspiracy theory, the GO AWAY. your comments are not only detracting from a good conversation, they are FALSE and do nothing to offer a counter argument.
I think what's happened here is that you have read things online where people claim that this is the whole reason 9-11 happened. The OP in no way insists that 9-11 was staged to cover this up, he's saying that 9-11 happened and the rest of the news just got washed away. It could be coincidence, vaguely related, or directly related. You don't know the truth about 9-11, no one in the general public does. That's why so many conspiracy theories crop up around it. Sift through the bull, and you may find some thought provoking questions which are absolutely worth asking. The beauty of this site is that for every hair brained, cockamamie ET theory there's a well thought out, well informed and relevant thread like this.
In fiscal 1999, a defense audit found that about $2.3 trillion of balances, transactions and adjustments were inadequately documented. These "unsupported" transactions do not mean the department ultimately cannot account for them, she advised, but that tracking down needed documents would take a long time. Auditors, she said, might have to go to different computer systems, to different locations or access different databases to get information.
Originally posted by kwakakev
Trying to find out the actual budget of a standard government organisation is not an easy process, when it comes to the military it gets even harder. Here is one investigation on it www.exopolitics.org...
Originally posted by samkent
here
In fiscal 1999, a defense audit found that about $2.3 trillion of balances, transactions and adjustments were inadequately documented. These "unsupported" transactions do not mean the department ultimately cannot account for them, she advised, but that tracking down needed documents would take a long time. Auditors, she said, might have to go to different computer systems, to different locations or access different databases to get information.
Why do we have to keep repeating this info? So people want soooo badly to have a conspiracy that they just refuse to look for the truth. It took about 5 seconds to Google the answer. It takes you longer to whine about 911 than it does to find the truth.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Originally posted by samkent
here
In fiscal 1999, a defense audit found that about $2.3 trillion of balances, transactions and adjustments were inadequately documented. These "unsupported" transactions do not mean the department ultimately cannot account for them, she advised, but that tracking down needed documents would take a long time. Auditors, she said, might have to go to different computer systems, to different locations or access different databases to get information.
Why do we have to keep repeating this info? So people want soooo badly to have a conspiracy that they just refuse to look for the truth. It took about 5 seconds to Google the answer. It takes you longer to whine about 911 than it does to find the truth.
Why do you repeat the same info?
I guess I'm just curious about how the Pentagon accounting project office set specifically to determine the disposition of the $2.3 trillion coincidentally happened to be located at the the point of impact for some jet on 9/11.
But don't worry. It's just accounting errors.