It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
though it is considered unlikely given that they have no surface and their gravity is enormous.[15] The natural satellites of giant planets, meanwhile, remain perfectly valid candidates for hosting life
Originally posted by XRaDiiX
reply to post by xBWOMPx
Because i choose not to be atheist and say there is no god/higher being etc there is no way to know for sure so i am agnostic i just choose not to decide on the fence you could say.
So i am not atheist i am agnostic i just like to say atheist because some people don't know the meaning of agnostic i guess.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
reply to post by XRaDiiX
In a way earth is also tidally locked to our sun, but to a lesser degree than the moon is tidally locked to the earth.
Kepler data is astounding. Any chances that the kepler data may be erroneous.
Originally posted by Angelic Resurrection
reply to post by XRaDiiX
Great informative thread.
In a way earth is also tidally locked to our sun, but to a lesser degree than the moon is tidally locked to the earth.
Kepler data is astounding. Any chances that the kepler data may be erroneous.
More the merrier i guess
I think what we need is another space race (preferably without a cold war) to reinvigorate the drive to progress science and explore. But it really shouldn't have to come down to "Well we need to be better than these people", space and science needs more popularizers, like Neil Tyson, now more than ever.
Nbiru, Elenin, hey that's the joy of conspiracy sites lol, reach as far as you can at whatever minimal evidence you can scrounge up. People need to stop being so infatuated with wanting to be the generation where some global devastation happens and do something about reality.
Have you checked out the planethunters.org website? It's pretty cool and a powerful community science project, not to mention the fact that it's great way to spread the information. I think they got up to about 50 planet candidates missed by the automated NASA KEPLER Pipeline, I've personally gone through about 2,000 stars of Kepler Data, found a couple promising candidates but they didn't get ranked high enough by the people to be included in the 50. Should be pretty interesting seeing how many of these 50 are confirmed, contrasting computer and human brain pattern seeking.