It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Evidence against 9/11 plotters revealed

page: 1
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 10 2011 @ 10:59 PM
link   

Until the last minute, according to the indictment, Sheikh Mohammed controlled the entire operation

www.rawstory.com...

If that was the case then this would have made Sheikh Mohammed the most powerful man in the world.
Either Sheikh Mohammed knew our military and FAA would sit silence for an hour and do absolutely nothing, while these alleged hijack planes flew around highly restricted airspace. I am talking about our nuclear power plants.
If these terrorist wanted to do some real damage all they had to do was fly the planes into our nuclear power plants killing millions of Americans.
Again all we are getting is nothing but hearsay information with no credible sources to back the government claims.
BTW, Sheikh Mohammed said Bin Laden was his boss I find this to be a lie because of this bombshell:


Ryland: A Sibel Edmonds 'Bombshell' - Bin Laden Worked for U.S. Until 9/11

www.bradblog.com...


Who do you believe a credible whistle blower, or a government that has gone out of their way to covering up the real evidence of 911?
Now our government wants these men Tried in our military courts, so all the details and evidence can be hidden away from the world.
edit on 10-4-2011 by impressme because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2011 @ 11:48 PM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 



If these terrorist wanted to do some real damage all they had to do was fly the planes into our nuclear power plants killing millions of Americans.


That's an interesting thought. If "terrorists" really wanted to murder the American people, then all they had to do was fly planes into our nuclear facilities.

Apparently the terrorists did not want to kill that many Americans, they just wanted to put on a show for them to have an excuse to create a police state and go to war.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 12:08 AM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 



BTW, Sheikh Mohammed said Bin Laden was his boss I find this to be a lie because of this bombshell:


Why does that need to be a lie?
Bin Laden may have been the handler for the CIA..
Who knows??



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 04:05 AM
link   
reply to post by dalan.
 


Problem is not easy to hit - those sited on rivers are often surrounded by hills and woods making difficult to
line up and hit

There are numerous other obstructions surrounding the reactor building - high concrete cooling towers to
cool water water before it is discharged

Electrical transmission towers

Refer to usual claim that the hijackers "could not fly" . The 9/11 targets were large easy to spot and more over
isolated (WTC by height, Pentagon - exposed open plain) . Nuclear facilites not so

Also nuclear facilities are enclosed by several feet of high density reinforced concrete - refer again to test
done at Los Alamos where obsolete F4 Phantom fighter was strapped to rocket sled and rammed into
concrete wall simulatting containment structure around nuclear plant.

Plane was shredded into million pieces. Wall barely scratched

Indian Point Nuclear plant - 35 miles north of NYC



Notice hills around plant

Also there are 2 S bends in Hudson river leading to plant and are several bridges crossing river - try flying large
airliner along river here



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 07:12 AM
link   
Here is our supposed Trial of the Century to convict the 9/11 plotters for their role in the last attack on American soil yet the trial is not going to be on American soil or even in an American Civil Court.
No, they have to try these men in a military court in Guantanamo Cuba, Why is that?
Will they waterboard during cross-examination?
This is a sham.
If these guys attacked America then try them here in America by a civil court.
Oh, but then certain "details" might get out that the government doesn't want us to know.
Riiiiiight!



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 08:07 AM
link   
Will the evidence be rendered public?



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 09:20 AM
link   
And you all miss one of the BEST reasons to have these trials in a military court. Less chance of a jackwagon lawyer getting charges dropped due to an enhanced interrogation....misspelling on a search warrant....information developed from not quite legal means...



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 01:37 PM
link   
reply to post by thedman
 



Also nuclear facilities are enclosed by several feet of high density reinforced concrete - refer again to test
done at Los Alamos where obsolete F4 Phantom fighter was strapped to rocket sled and rammed into
concrete wall simulatting containment structure around nuclear plant.

Plane was shredded into million pieces. Wall barely scratched

Indian Point Nuclear plant - 35 miles north of NYC


That makes one wonder then, how did a plane slice through the pentagon like butter so easily?



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 01:58 PM
link   
reply to post by dalan.
 


Pentagon was not reinforced concrete - was facing of cut limestone about 8 in (same material faces
Empire State Bldg) backed by brick wall

Motive was to save steel which was becoming critical during WW II



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 08:17 PM
link   
reply to post by impressme
 


There can be no dount that the US and elements thereof planned then carried out 911. As others already stated if terrorists wanted to do real damage then they would have flown the planes into any nuclear facility or any number of the waste storage and processing plants across the US. That is a strong indicator that dark factions of and within the US government had a role in the events of 911. Many pieces of the 911 puzzle are so obvious to have "planted" or staged in a manner that anyone performing any investigation into the events leading up to the day and afterwards can tell it was planned.

* Pieces of passport nicely framing a photo of the terrorists found in PA & NYC.
* Military Base Flight schools providing training to those involved.
* Phone calls from the wife of Bush's Solicitor General proven to be fabricated. By the FBI no less.
* A "plane" (or somehting) hitting the Pentagon exactly where the records for the missing/unaccounted for trillions in transactions were stored.
* Planes causing heat ranges so great they melted steel and pulverized concrete yet the gov "recovered" DNA.
The list could continue....

911 was an inside job.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 08:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Humint1
 


It is truly amazing how many clueless people still think that the FBI "proved" that Barbara Olson did not call her husband that day. Equally amazing is that they are completely unable to finish the reading that shows the FBI states that Barbara called her husband using one of the Airfones.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 08:30 PM
link   
reply to post by vipertech0596
 


Boy, your sure out there.

In the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui the FBI did indeed prove that her phone call was false or, never happened. You need to do some reading & research then come back when your head and facts are in order.



Good reading here for those factually deprived > Pilots for Truth
edit on 4/11/2011 by Humint1 because: add link



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 08:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Humint1
 


Like I said, its amazing how many people (YOU) fail to finish the reading from the trial exhibits. Here's a clue for you, when exhibits (FBI documents) are entered into a trial and accepted by the defense, they are called evidence.

You can post your colorful little picture all you want to, but until you look at the other pictures and read the statements, you are going to continue to appear ignorant.
edit on 11-4-2011 by vipertech0596 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 08:37 PM
link   
reply to post by vipertech0596
 


And that evidence was shown that her phone call never happened. Go back to your rabbit hole now.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 08:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Humint1
 


FBI documents about Barbara Olson's phone calls and attempted phone calls to her husband that day.

www.911myths.com...

Again, what you fail to realize is that SOMEONE on Flight 77 made collect calls to the Solictor General's office that day asking to speak to Ted Olson. That someone was Barbara Olson.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 08:56 PM
link   


Again, what you fail to realize is that SOMEONE on Flight 77 made collect calls to the Solictor General's office that day asking to speak to Ted Olson. That someone was Barbara Olson.


A phone call that lasted zero seconds.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 09:31 PM
link   
reply to post by Smack
 


Try reading the documents. Her attempt at using her cell was indeed 0 seconds. Her calls from the Airfones were several minutes



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 09:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Humint1
 


Then there is the whole "plane crashed into the exact spot where all the records were stored" garbage. That 2.3 trillion dollars are the most overused, misunderstood attempts by truthers to prove a conspiracy.

It was never missing money, it was inadequate documentation for accounting adjustments. And if it WAS an attempt to destroy the records, it was a piddle poor attempt for two reasons 1. The financial records for the DoD are kept in more than one area and 2. accountants were able to run down the missing documentation in the year following 9/11.
edit on 11-4-2011 by vipertech0596 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 09:57 PM
link   
reply to post by thedman
 


Problem is not easy to hit - those sited on rivers are often surrounded by hills and woods making difficult to
line up and hit

There are numerous other obstructions surrounding the reactor building - high concrete cooling towers to
cool water water before it is discharged

Electrical transmission towers


There is not a single obstacle that you mention that can’t be overcome.

The planes could easily been program to hit their targets any professional pilot can program the on board computers to hit exactly where they want to hit. Those were good excuses you made, but I don’t think power lines will stop a jet moving at 500knts

My understanding was these radical Muslims hate Americans they hate our freedom they hate our way of life, all these info was told to us by our mainstream media and our political leaders.

These terrorist are not concern about killing just a few thousand Americans they made it very clears the more the better.
If they had hit our nuclear power plants it would have wipe out millions of Americans creating nuclear fallout that would have made many parts of the United States uninhabitable. This would have created an economic meltdown in this country.

In every case I have read about terrorist blowing up school buses of children, day care centers, schools, church buses, restaurants and shopping malls killing as many people as possible (they) the terrorist can’t wait to let the nearest media outlet know they are responsible. These terrorist want to inflict as much damaged as possible.

As far as who did 911 we heard nothing from any terrorist groups celebrating their evil act. All we were told is Bin Laden was behind these attacks this info was given to us before the WTC fell on the morning of 911. This was told to us by the mainstream News that morning by News media, retired military officials, and FBI before 1200 pm that afternoon.

How would they know that Bin Laden was behind the attacks so soon? The fact is Bin Laden was working for our government until 911. Looks to me we were all fooled by people working for the perpetrator, (retired military spoke persons, and the FBI) in helping them get away with their false flag operation, by diverting our attention to OBL.

Hitting the WTC would only do a small amount of damage and it certainly wouldn’t cause an economic hardship.

IF our government wanted to pull off a false flag operation they would use their biggest weapon and that is our mainstream media. Our government would try and keep the casualties as low as possible, and that is what they did.

The fact is back in 1998 the Port Authority submitted a proposal to the city council for demolition of the WTC. It would have been cheaper to demolish the towers than to pay for the abatement asbestos removal program. This was no secret and apparently demolition experts had already looked into the best way to take the towers down by causing the least amount of damage to other buildings, and I am assuming they felt they could do it without a hitch.
It is no secrete that certain members of the Port Authority and Larry Siverstine have strong political ties with powerful political leaders.

The Port Authority wanted the WTC gone and what better way to have them removed by allowing the Towers to be used in a false flag attack and rigged up for one spectacular Shock and Ah. All they needed was the mainstream media to broadcast the whole event and by having reporters at ground level interviewing people who had been in the WTC and on lookers for traumatic effect of people crying, injured, people falling out of the Towers and so on…

I know when I watched that morning on 911 I was completely shocked by what I witness on television it was very hard for me and everyone around us to take in what just happened I was very depressed at the lost of life and property damage, all I kept thinking is how did our government allow this to happened. There is too much evidence that supports demolition at the WTC and our Government sits silent on this tragedy.

As I said before real radical terrorist would have taken out our nuclear power stations.
I don’t see our government using our nuclear power station for their Shock and Ah and wiping out half of our population in the United States. 911 was a perfect military operation carried out with perfect timing and a spectacular emotional impact on the world’s population. The world forever changed on the morning of 911.



posted on Apr, 11 2011 @ 09:58 PM
link   
reply to post by vipertech0596
 


Here is evidence related to this issue, provided by the government prosecution in the case against Zacarias Moussaoui:
www.vaed.uscourts.gov...

Produce the DOJ Phone records and we'll talk. Otherwise you have no leg to stand on.




top topics



 
14
<<   2 >>

log in

join