It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Light cannot be seen.
If it could, all you would see is light everywhere. Instead, light is carried and projects itself on form. Light is carried by wave as an image reflected on substance. A mirror cannot see itself. God provides the light to reflect on the substance formed by the wave on energy (dark energy). This duality reflects in all other dualities... The egg and the sperm. The left and right hand. Nostrils. Eyes. Ears. Male and Female. Good and evil. Light and dark. All degrees of opposites in reflection.
Originally posted by Garfee
reply to post by SuperiorEd
But that's not proof that god or a god exists.
Having faith that a god exists is simply proof that one has faith that a god exists. The other points are speculation, though well thought and I appreciated the post.
The only way one will know if a god exists is after death and that is the greatest mystery of all. As things are, there can be no proof a god exists due to the fact that one must have faith that it does. If there were proof, there would be no need for any faith in it's existence.
edit on 7-4-2011 by Garfee because: Typo
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by SuperiorEd
Light cannot be seen.
Completely wrong, I’m afraid. Light is the only thing we can see. And since this first premise is wrong, all of the following...
If it could, all you would see is light everywhere. Instead, light is carried and projects itself on form. Light is carried by wave as an image reflected on substance. A mirror cannot see itself. God provides the light to reflect on the substance formed by the wave on energy (dark energy). This duality reflects in all other dualities... The egg and the sperm. The left and right hand. Nostrils. Eyes. Ears. Male and Female. Good and evil. Light and dark. All degrees of opposites in reflection.
...is obviously wrong, too. Your proof fails at the first hurdle. However ‘beautiful’ it may be, it is not ‘intuitively true’, nor, indeed, true in any sense at all.
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
God provides the light
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
God provides the light
All the light we know of is traced to natural sources. What makes you believe that Magic Man is responsible for light?
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
Define the source of nature please.
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
This is revealed by the fact that the Bible accurately foretells the events of history before they happen.
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
You see the things light reflects on.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
Define the source of nature please.
I'm uncertain as to what you're asking. Do you mean the source of the universe? Oh, it doesn't matter because no matter what, you'll claim that the source is some kind of god or deity.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
This is revealed by the fact that the Bible accurately foretells the events of history before they happen.
Actually, it doesn't.
Could you show us the passages which foretell Hitler and the internet?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
This is revealed by the fact that the Bible accurately foretells the events of history before they happen.
Actually, it doesn't.
Could you show us the passages which foretell Hitler and the internet?
Originally posted by iterationzero
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
You see the things light reflects on.
And why do you see those things? Because you're seeing the light that has been reflected from them. Your explanation is completely backwards. You'd be better off claiming that it's the objects we never actually see, much like Plato did.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
Define the source of nature please.
I'm uncertain as to what you're asking. Do you mean the source of the universe? Oh, it doesn't matter because no matter what, you'll claim that the source is some kind of god or deity.
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
No. If you saw the light that reflects off the matter, you would see the light in all directions as it reflects. You don't see any light between you and the thing the light hits, but you only see the frequency the light emits in relation to perspective. Light only reveals the image of form. Between you and the form, light is going in ALL directions and encompassing all space. The star light you see from the nearest star refracts light in all directions with no exceptions. You see a point. Think it through. The light is not visible, only what it hits in reflection.
Originally posted by iterationzero
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
No. If you saw the light that reflects off the matter, you would see the light in all directions as it reflects. You don't see any light between you and the thing the light hits, but you only see the frequency the light emits in relation to perspective. Light only reveals the image of form. Between you and the form, light is going in ALL directions and encompassing all space. The star light you see from the nearest star refracts light in all directions with no exceptions. You see a point. Think it through. The light is not visible, only what it hits in reflection.
You don't seem to understand the difference between reflected light, diffuse light, and scattered light.