It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Sinnthia
Semantics. You know what they want to see and that's what Obama does not want to show..
Simple, no semantics required..
Do carry on..
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by LilDudeissocool
> St John Hospital & Medical Center ( Note I have it written as if the hospital belongs to the saint in my last post. I guess I should get with the times.)
backinblack, may I ask why you care about such a clarification regarding that particular specific?
Sure..Listing a hospital on the BC is proof of birth in that state IMO..
Without it then it may have been a home birth and those were accepted and given BCs with minimum proof..
It's said some people even lied about births so they could get instant citizenship..
If you are going to just continue to deflect, either do it better or just own it. I have asked you to back up a claim you made. How many times do I need to ask before you even try?
Originally posted by backinblack
What claim relevant to the thread would that be ??
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by backinblack
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by backinblack
You know that is 100% not true..
His family could have organized a BC even if he wasn't born there..FACT..
No, a birther lie - if he was not born there his birth certificate would not show he was born in Hawaii - once again birthers show they are not interested in the truth!
Yes it would mate...
No, it would not. That does not even make any sense. Why would it? That would be completely antithetical to its purpose. That is quite and extrordinary claim you are making. Care to back it up? Could you back it up? Are you basing it on anything or just saying it because you have been told it?
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Sinnthia
Ahh, but that's been answered many times..
It was quite easy back then especially to get a BC giving the excuse as a home birth with very little proof..
The BC would still show Hawaii but obviously not a hospital etc..
Do birthers understand the difference between proof and repetition?
Originally posted by backinblack
I have seen the PROOF posted in many similar threads..
Since you post in all I'm certain you have seen them..
Tell me, how do you think home birthers get a BC ??
BTW, I was a home birth..I've got a BC..
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Sinnthia
lol, nice tactics but boring...
Carry on the deflections while Obama refuses to show a piece of paper that, if he hasn't lied, shows nothing we don't already know about him..
That about sums it up..
BTW, if it was me I'd have no problems showing it to answer the critics...
Originally posted by backinblack
Kinda ridiculous don't you think?
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by backinblack
Kinda ridiculous don't you think?
Certainly is. Now, just back up your claim about HI BCs. That is the only thing I am interested in. Got that, yet?
Originally posted by backinblack
For what earthly purpose??
It's quite simple as I keep saying..
There is NOTHING on his long form that is a secret.
All the details that could possibly be listed on it have already been stated by Obama..
So the only question is why does he not want to release it??
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Sinnthia
lol, claim what you wish..
The FACTS speak for themselves..
Your are conducting a boring circular argument while ignoring the simple fact I have stated..
Carry on, lines=$s....
There is NOTHING on his long form that is a secret.
All the details that could possibly be listed on it have already been stated by Obama..