It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by mrMasterJoe
really becuase i must have missed the news where it was confirmed in either of those cases. The discovery of ET material or hybrid ETs would tend to make the news. Where is it? why arn't these claims accepted by the scientific community and which peer review journals were the results verified?edit on 6-4-2011 by yeti101 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Xadaz
(...)
Occam's Razor - I don't see aliens, no-one I've met has ever seen an alien, therefore they don't exist, (at least in this galaxy).
(...)]
Originally posted by mrMasterJoe
Originally posted by NeverSleepingEyes
reply to post by liejunkie01
a star to you for allowing me to rest, while you did the job of commenting on the sources the other participant was so kind to post.
You give him a star - for what exactly? His analysis is flawed like hell. He doesn't even know what National Press Club conferences are. I am sure you don't know that either. You are a lemming following the wrong traces. You have my pity.
Again, why was it so important to state giving him a star? Kids...
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by mrMasterJoe
What a load of bs, the worldwide scientific community deals with novel claims all the time, the reason your guys don't submit them for peer review is because they know only gullible people like you would fall for their crap and They would be shot down in flames by the scientific communit exposing them as fraudsedit on 6-4-2011 by yeti101 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mrMasterJoe
reply to post by Xadaz
YOU don't use logic. If you would you would check the facts that I have stated. And please show me where there is fiction included? Nothing I have stated is fiction based. It's only your prejudices that make you think so. No logic from your side involved.
You are nothing more than a "noisy negativist" like Staton T. Friedman would say.
And by the way, using Okkam's razor! Regarding the topic UFOs the only conclusion can be: UFO's do exist. Where there is smoke there is a fire. MANY people have seen UFOs. Many many many more than you could ever have friends. Pilots have seen UFOs. Radars have tracked UFOs. Astonauts have seen UFOs.
You are egocentric in the way I have stated several replies above. Because YOU haven't seen evidence for YOU means there is none. That IS egocentric.
Your "logic" is only one thing: screwed up. Get a brain.edit on 6-4-2011 by mrMasterJoe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by mrMasterJoe
reply to post by NeverSleepingEyes
You know that you are in fact just that: a kid.
It's ridiculous that you think that it really bothers me
that you give anyone here a star.
You haven't even understood my comment.
It's the lack of thinking for yourself that bothers me.
And for that I can only give you my true pity.
Originally posted by smokingman2006
when I see all the skeptics on this board I started to wonder about the true breakdown in numbers of those who believe in Aliens & those who don't and also how many fence sitters are here.
So the vote should be 1 YES
2 NO
3 not sure
Peace & Hope
SM
(Mods not sure if this is the right forum)
edit on 5-4-2011 by smokingman2006 because: had to make this thread clearer to understand
Originally posted by mrMasterJoe
reply to post by liejunkie01
It's the sum of things that makes up the evidence. It's connecting the dots that makes it. Just looking at the separate parts of a car won't make it drive. So where is your point really?
If you like to have true alien artifacts (=touchable evidence) look at Dr. Leirs work, e.g. He removes implants from abductees. The analysis of these implants indicates extraterrestrial origin of an artificial material. Or look at the evidence of the "Star Child" skull. This has been proven (several DNA tests) to be half extraterretrial. You just don't know these facts. And what's about the UFO landing sites and the analysis results of the soil? Do you know any of this at all?
You say that's hearsay? Well with you reasoning most biased naysayers do argument. Stated above you see that there is more than just witness testimonies. Also note that many of the witnesses are former high ranking military personel. Note that there are many radar recordings available of UFOs which clearly indicate that UFOs are under intelligent control and do things we can't do - until this very day. Note that crop circles are NOT all made by man (many are) and if you think so you just ignored the fact that I have also listed Nancy Talbot. She discovered many startling things about crop circles which clearly indicate that it cannot be made by some people with ropes and wood. Get the facts. Do your homework right before opposing something you don't understand.
Saying that the press conferences are someone's agenda is just insane. That is a conspiracy in itself. And this has absolutely NO foundation whatsoever. Looking at the money involved: The witnesses do not get much if any money for that. And the cases are real. You can look up each end every one of them. But you just don't do that.
Edit to add: What you are stating is even TOTALLY incorrect as the conferences I am listing there are NPC conferences. Do you even know what that is??
I have seen UFOs myself on some occasions - so no hearsaying at all. I've done enough "homework" to know what I am talking about. I do not understand why people like you oppose this topic in such a way that one might think you are fighting an opponent. Are you so afraid of the idea that we are being vistied by extraterrestrial beings? Well, get used to it. You won't change reality.
If one can't connect the dots then I can't help.
How much more clues and facts does it take to realize that this is NOT just hearsay? There has been a lot of research. Are you really so ignorant?
You guys are biased and full of prejudices. You are anal. You are talking biased BS. Do your homework right then we can talk again.edit on 6-4-2011 by mrMasterJoe because: (no reason given)
Or look at the evidence of the "Star Child" skull. This has been proven (several DNA tests) to be half extraterretrial.
What you are stating is even TOTALLY incorrect as the conferences I am listing there are NPC conferences. Do you even know what that is??
Washington, DC - November 13th, 2007
This is a preliminary report, first in a series, on yesterday's event in Washington, DC at the National Press Club (NPC), organized by producer James Fox ("Out of the Blue") and Leslie Kean, reporter (who recently won a major FOIA lawsuit against NASA to release the 1965 Kecksberg UFO related documents) and moderated by former Arizona Governor, Fife Symington. The NPC press conference presented the personal testimonies of major military and civilian pilots and intelligence figures from around the world on the subject of official foreign investigations of UFOs.
.
You guys are biased and full of prejudices. You are anal. You are talking biased BS. Do your homework right then we can talk again