It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Originally posted by Alec Eiffel
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
I mean, think about it, would you ever see a cow flying an airplane? That may sound silly, actually it is, but my point is a cow wouldnt evovle to the point where it was smart enough to develop such things, because they cant manipulate their environment.
Can't manipulate the environment? What do you think is happening when they eat grass? Or walk on it for that matter. You must be thinking of the cows in the factory farming industry
If you trace our genetic ancestry back to its alleged roots you will find monkeys who swing from trees and fling poo. They evolved and can now be seen flying airplanes, silly but true.
By "manipulate" I meant things like, building a fire, making a hut, using tools for hunting... I dont see how cows manipulate anything. And what you said about monkeys is my whole point, they are bi-pedal! So its only inevitable that they would evovle to the point where they could fly airplanes! did you miss my point? The point I was trying to make is that, it seems like it would be near impossible for any species that isnt pi-pedal, to become advanced enough to the point where they could fly aircraft to other planets.. What I was trying to say is, I dont find it that surprising that aliens are bi-pedal.
Well your use of the word manipulate is simply wrong.
Again eating grass, walking on grass (killing life by doing so), are all ways they manipulate the environment. Did you miss my point? You don't see that it's manipulation because it's not as grand as turning lead to gold.
As far as bi-pedal being a prereq for the evolution of self-awarness, that doesn't really coincide with the evolution theory. I think that's more the biasness of a bi-pedal
Originally posted by Alec Eiffel
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Originally posted by Alec Eiffel
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
I mean, think about it, would you ever see a cow flying an airplane? That may sound silly, actually it is, but my point is a cow wouldnt evovle to the point where it was smart enough to develop such things, because they cant manipulate their environment.
Can't manipulate the environment? What do you think is happening when they eat grass? Or walk on it for that matter. You must be thinking of the cows in the factory farming industry
If you trace our genetic ancestry back to its alleged roots you will find monkeys who swing from trees and fling poo. They evolved and can now be seen flying airplanes, silly but true.
By "manipulate" I meant things like, building a fire, making a hut, using tools for hunting... I dont see how cows manipulate anything. And what you said about monkeys is my whole point, they are bi-pedal! So its only inevitable that they would evovle to the point where they could fly airplanes! did you miss my point? The point I was trying to make is that, it seems like it would be near impossible for any species that isnt pi-pedal, to become advanced enough to the point where they could fly aircraft to other planets.. What I was trying to say is, I dont find it that surprising that aliens are bi-pedal.
Well your use of the word manipulate is simply wrong.
Again eating grass, walking on grass (killing life by doing so), are all ways they manipulate the environment. Did you miss my point? You don't see that it's manipulation because it's not as grand as turning lead to gold.
As far as bi-pedal being a prereq for the evolution of self-awarness, that doesn't really coincide with the evolution theory. I think that's more the biasness of a bi-pedal
ma�nip�u�late :To move, arrange, operate, or control by the hands or by mechanical means, especially in a skillful manner.
I guess the dictionary is wrong, too. I never said bi-pedalism is a prereq for self-awareness, I said that the only species that could become technologically advanced were bi-pedal species. Because of their ability to manipulate their environment (more so than cows!) We appear to have different ideas on the word manipulate, sure, by your definition, cows can manipulate their environment by stepping on grass, but stepping on grass wont get them anywhere near the ability to build aircrafts. Thats all im saying. Bi-pedal species can manipulate their environment more than any other species, so its only natural that they would become the smartest and most technologically advanced.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Originally posted by Alec Eiffel
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Originally posted by Alec Eiffel
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
I mean, think about it, would you ever see a cow flying an airplane? That may sound silly, actually it is, but my point is a cow wouldnt evovle to the point where it was smart enough to develop such things, because they cant manipulate their environment.
Can't manipulate the environment? What do you think is happening when they eat grass? Or walk on it for that matter. You must be thinking of the cows in the factory farming industry
If you trace our genetic ancestry back to its alleged roots you will find monkeys who swing from trees and fling poo. They evolved and can now be seen flying airplanes, silly but true.
By "manipulate" I meant things like, building a fire, making a hut, using tools for hunting... I dont see how cows manipulate anything. And what you said about monkeys is my whole point, they are bi-pedal! So its only inevitable that they would evovle to the point where they could fly airplanes! did you miss my point? The point I was trying to make is that, it seems like it would be near impossible for any species that isnt pi-pedal, to become advanced enough to the point where they could fly aircraft to other planets.. What I was trying to say is, I dont find it that surprising that aliens are bi-pedal.
Well your use of the word manipulate is simply wrong.
Again eating grass, walking on grass (killing life by doing so), are all ways they manipulate the environment. Did you miss my point? You don't see that it's manipulation because it's not as grand as turning lead to gold.
As far as bi-pedal being a prereq for the evolution of self-awarness, that doesn't really coincide with the evolution theory. I think that's more the biasness of a bi-pedal
ma�nip�u�late :To move, arrange, operate, or control by the hands or by mechanical means, especially in a skillful manner.
I guess the dictionary is wrong, too. I never said bi-pedalism is a prereq for self-awareness, I said that the only species that could become technologically advanced were bi-pedal species. Because of their ability to manipulate their environment (more so than cows!) We appear to have different ideas on the word manipulate, sure, by your definition, cows can manipulate their environment by stepping on grass, but stepping on grass wont get them anywhere near the ability to build aircrafts. Thats all im saying. Bi-pedal species can manipulate their environment more than any other species, so its only natural that they would become the smartest and most technologically advanced.
Bi-pedal species can manipulate their environment more than any other species, so its only natural that they would become the smartest and most technologically advanced
Now that's a much better way of saying it =)
Ok so you're saying bi-pedalism is a prereq for becoming technologically advanced.
I said that the only species that could become technologically advanced were bi-pedal species
But not a prereq for consciousness or self-awarness.
I never said bi-pedalism is a prereq for self-awareness
According to evolutionary psychology the two beget the other.
I agree being a bipedal has advantages in ones ability to manipulate the environment, thus it would seem that would help set the stage for the evolution of mind...so it would seem.
Are there not bipedal species that evolved from a quadrupedal states? This could be the evolutionary path for the cow. I would also like to point out that the Tyrannosaurus was a bipedal but had retarded hands, hardly capable of "manipulating" the environment.
Bipedal? The legs? Seems to me you are actually pointing the emphasis on the hands. Cows do not have functional hands which seems to be the primary force in "manipulation". So maybe they are not the prime canidates.
Rats have decently functional hands. Maybe they will fly saucers eventually.
Point is the scientific community isn't sure what's responsible for the evolution of mind or what it takes for a species to become technologically advanced. The only thing that is really certian is times role in it. Enough time elapses and $hit is bound to change. It's too early to assume cows won't eventually evolve to flying planes.
[edit on 10-10-2004 by Lucid Lunacy]
Originally posted by jp1111
Anyways, I'm still not convinced why an alien species would have to be bi-pedal in order to become the most advanced on their planet.
The rule of bi-pedalism as a required characteristic to become advance on a planet surely applies to our earth, but why would it apply to some other planet? Don't the environment and their unique evolutionary pathway have to decide to what features are needed to become the most advanced on their planet? Therefore, unless that planet has an environment similar to ours, the most advanced species there would not have to bi-pedal.
Originally posted by jp1111
Originally posted by kode
Originally posted by Biggie
Humans evolving into become taller, stronger, and more intelligent may be more a product of modern technology then evolution. That is, people are taller and stronger because of better nutrition and health care, and more intelligent because of increased access to information
But couldn�t that be classed as evolution or does it have to be a biological?
Evolution is a product of both biological and environmental factors. As environment changes, species acquire new traits in order to survive the changes, through adaptations. These new traits are passed through generations over a long period which is evolution. Mutations also play a part in evolution. This is specialization.
Contrary to that, in our case, today, WE are changing our own environment to make it suit our needs. Now, this is generalization.
We may be becoming smarter, healthier, and technologically more advanced, however, this could prove harmful to us and to other organisms. Look at extinction rates of the different organisms due to human interferences in their natural habitats. Look at the destruction of the ozone layer.
Originally posted by Pavel
I dont think that you realize it but human evolution is over, there is no more natural selection. Everyone has kids!
Do you even know what evolution is? You said radiation? Radiation kills you, destrsoi your DNA, you die!