It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Dennis Kucinich highlights the cost of the various wars we are fighting in the middle east "Expanding wars expands the Pentagon costing more than 700 billion dollars this year. That's 50% discretionary spending. The United States funds 25% of NATO's military expenses. All these wars cost trillions". Kucinich also expands on the amount of money we have spent so far on each of these nations individually: "As of today, we would have spent $ 805 billion to bring democracy to Iraq, $ 433 billion to bring democracy to Afghanistan. Perhaps, a billion dollars already to bring democracy to Libya. I have an idea: Let's bring democracy to America".
Originally posted by hadriana
Dennis did NOT want to vote for the healthcare bill.
He was set against it - he wanted a public option and not this crap we got.
Then there was the airplane ride....the airplane ride with Obama, and suddenly Dennis shut up and sat down and voted for it.
I always wanted to know what was said on that airplane ride.
(Michael Louis Connell (November 30, 1963 – December 19, 2008) was a high-level Republican consultant who was subpoenaed in a case regarding alleged tampering with the 2004 U.S. Presidential election and a case involving thousands of missing emails pertaining to the political firing of U.S. Attorneys. Connell was killed in a plane crash on December 19, 2008.)
Originally posted by Pha3drus
Time for Constitutional Republic to come back to America!
Get rid of 528 Corprocrats in the House and Senate!
Yes there are at least 7 that aren't Corprocrats!
Despite your vote on Obama Care, I believe you are one of the good ones, Dennis! I know if it was today you wouldn't have voted for it.
Originally posted by Pha3drus
reply to post by boondock-saint
I understand your reasoning. It's just that very few politicians speak out against wars, and he is one of them - even if he doesn't really mean what he says.
Originally posted by MrWendal
Originally posted by Pha3drus
reply to post by boondock-saint
I understand your reasoning. It's just that very few politicians speak out against wars, and he is one of them - even if he doesn't really mean what he says.
Dont we need to look at ALL the issues and not just one single issue?
This is typical of ALL politicians. They all sooner or later take one issue and side with the general population, on other issues they do not. Come re-election, the people are dumb enough to focus on what the candidate did that they liked, and forget what was done that they did not like. This is why we have a Congress full of people who care not for the Republic, care not for the will of the people, care not for the Constitution, and do care for the Corporations, Big Government, and the kick backs they can receive. This is why the game keeps being played, because it works well, idiot voters refuse to look at the big pictures. Instead they focus on one small frame and say, "Well he speaks out against the wars!"
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
reply to post by jibeho
Honestly we need more politicians that vote against their own party. These leaders should not be conformists, otherwise we should only vote a party into office and not a person. I look forward to the day where our leaders use their own noggin and arrive at conclusions on their own accord, not on that of political party lines.