It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by squandered
More than 10 tonnes will greatly impact the gold price. 400 tonne would cut the price to 1/3, I think. This happened when the Swiss sold off a chunk of their holdings (nothing like 400 tonnes). Gold was under $300 p/ounce.
Mines will close down. Many closed before but these days mines are viable with small returns because of the high price. Probably half of the mines opened in the last few years will be forced to shut down and gold production will only trickle from places like Africa and New Guinea.
I must be wrong in my assumption. Declaring a sell off of 400 tonnes is suicide. Selling 10 tonnes and waiting for the price to recover is more prudent. If IMF are selling 400 tonnes like that something is afoot.
Gold rises on IMF gold sale to India
03 November 2009
SINGAPORE (Commodity Online) : Gold prices advanced near another record in Asian trade Tuesday mainly on reports of IMF’s 200 metric tone gold sale to India. - Full Text
Originally posted by OBE1
reply to post by squandered
Hello squandered. Global CB's were net sellers for over 2 decades under the Central Bank Gold Agreement. Then around 2007/2008 they gradually began falling short of the CBGA sales quota...ultimately shifting from net selling, to net buying, last year.
2007: Switzerland Central Bank to Sell 250 Tonnes of Gold
Sorry to hear about your loss. Not sure what company you're referring to, or when that happened, but well managed projects with decent reserves and reasonable production costs, can squeak by even in low price environments. Alternatively, a poorly managed miner can be sitting on an elephant sized deposit at record prices, and still run the company into the ground (no pun intended).
GL