checking out pentagon footage of 9/11 and noticed some anomalies in the sky

www.serendipity.li...

I was checking this website out, I found that if you take a look at the CCTV frames
of pentagon 9/11 attacks, There is a lot of aerial anomalies captured by the 5 frames of cctv
What do we think people? Bugs? im not sure

That plane just went face-first into a building and exploded.
How about flying debris ?

reply to post by holtdani


The only thing i see, is that no plane hit the building. There is nothing, then suddenly a huge explosion. I don't see any plane hitting the building at all.

As for the anomolies, i don't see any.

VVV

Originally posted by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep
reply to post by holtdani

 

The only thing i see, is that no plane hit the building. There is nothing, then suddenly a huge explosion. I don't see any plane hitting the building at all.

As for the anomolies, i don't see any.

VVV

The plane was travelling at over 500mph, and the CCTV camera had a low frame rate.

reply to post by LanceDH


Oh right, because there is CLEARLY a plane in those frames.

Pffft.....wow.

That plane just went face-first into a building and exploded.

I see an explosion, however, I do not see a plane. I wish I had your imagination, or at least, your eyesight.

How about flying debris ?

Seems like that tiny amount of "flying debris" is quite selective since it left the nearby Pentagon lawn in rather pristine condition. Oh yeah, I know, the remnants of the "plane" were atomized.

Can we keep the idiotic 9/11 stuff out of this thread.

The OP was asking about anomalies in the CCTV pics.

I'd like to hear what he thinks he is seeing in them first.

reply to post by skyjohn


Don't you think they would of shown a different camera angle with a better camera? isn't the Pentagon one of the most surveillanced buildings in the world?.

The plane was travelling at over 500mph, and the CCTV camera had a low frame rate.

Yep...when in doubt, it is best to use fast flying airplanes and low frame rate cameras to play tricks with people's eyes.

Originally posted by DontProbeMeBro
reply to post by LanceDH

 

Oh right, because there is CLEARLY a plane in those frames.

Pffft.....wow.

Originally posted by SphinxMontreal

That plane just went face-first into a building and exploded.

I see an explosion, however, I do not see a plane. I wish I had your imagination, or at least, your eyesight.

How about flying debris ?

Seems like that tiny amount of "flying debris" is quite selective since it left the nearby Pentagon lawn in rather pristine condition. Oh yeah, I know, the remnants of the "plane" were atomized.

Ok just to make you 2 happy, the plane bit wasn't the point of either my comment or the topic os a whole.
If you really want to have it your way: Something exploded in the pics (this I hope you DO see) which, plane causing it or not, still causes debris flying around, which IS what this topic is about.

And for a tiny rant to add to that: I honestly thought that people on these forums would use their brains more often.

Double post by accident

Just to get back to the initial question by the OP.

No, i don't see any anomalies, all i see is little pieces of debri in the sky?

What exactly is it that you are seeing?

VVv

Originally posted by skyjohn
Can we keep the idiotic 9/11 stuff out of this thread.

The OP was asking about anomalies in the CCTV pics.

I'd like to hear what he thinks he is seeing in them first.

Not a problem friend. But just to point out, you did in fact mention the plane and the frame rate of the camera, without actually contributing to the OP thread.

That said, no I see no anomalies in the sky at all.

reply to post by Viking9019


Has nothing to do with thread topic, but no I don't think they would have used higher fps cameras for simple CCTV on a security checkpoint.

Of course they weren't wasting money filming every angle of the building with HD cameras 24/7.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/eab6678a3956.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9e5acf287e4e.jpg[/atsimg]