Anyone Remember The Web Bot Prediction: 1.289+ Billion Mega Death from "ill winds". (Fukushima)

I think it's very sad indeed. That poeple look for lies and false prophets of all kinds. Anything besides real truth.



[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/6fa01ed581ef.jpg[/atsimg]


Proven thru ages. Tested by time. One bad ass book.

Just my opinion.

After World War II all the chemical weapon munitions were dumped at sea. They expected they would be sealed for 50 years in their munition canisters before they rusted thru.

50 years is up. Chemical Weapons are being released from under the sea and some are bubbling up causing ill winds to blow into countries. Why do you think all the maps showing where the US dumped them at sea are no longer available?

They used to hand those maps out to fishermen to avoid those areas....maps aren't even available anymore. Why?

Maybe China or Russia or somebody else could ride over with a fishing trollie and drop depth charges to release mass amounts of those chemical weapons at once since their containers are compromised...and the gas would blow into coastal areas of America and Canada and England where the crap was dumped.

They shouldn't have dumped that crap at sea...or created it.

to my reckoning... the Japanese 4 reactors as the 'ILL Wind' is a 'bonk'...

Now... If the meltdown happens and radiations fires start.... the prevailing winds will have to reverse direction and blow onto the shores of China for there to ever be a casualty count of 1.28 Billion people.

the current prevailing winds take the radiated dust or vapors across the Pacific...
where it is completely diluted by the massive volume of water there is in that Ocean...
thats even before it reaches even the jet stream air currents to settle in North America


your idea has sci fi merit... but on practical terms..no way with the present conditions...but all these variables are just that = 'variable & subject to change'

Originally posted by ALOSTSOUL
reply to post by MrWendal

 

.

Sorry for using the wrong terminology, I did not mean to demean the the event or anyone effected by it. I simple used the the word "spill" as that is how it has been reported by most.

I understand and I did not think you were attempting to demean the event. I am just a bit of a Nazi when it comes to the terminology used to describe the event.

I am sorry to hear this and if you can provide some links I would be happy to be enlightened and set right but seeing as were being pedantic, you have only stated that they are sick not that they have died. I stated that no one has died in my OP and you haven't corrected me on that.

You will not find any links. People here are going to the doctor, but they are being treated for everything while the real cause of their problems remain undetected. You will not find a Death Certificate that says "Corexit Poisoning", instead it will say "Respiratory Failure". If you show up to the Doctor with rashes, soars, or any other symptom it will automatically be diagnosed with Scabies, or any number of other things. The best I can do to give you a link is to suggest reading over the site Project Gulf Impact. There is even a list of Doctors there that will test for hydrocarbons in the blood and actually take into consideration the possibility of of exposure to Corexit, but as you will see on that site, the list is rather small. There is at least a couple thousand Doctors in my area, but only 3 who will do appropriate test and even consider exposure to Corexix. If I remember correctly they list a few of their organizations members on that site who have died already. Just watch what happens in Japan. As people die later on, the cause of death will be cancer, tumor, or whatever else but you will not see any mention of Radiation. Still that does not mean the radiation was not a factor.

Please note that I did not make the prediction, it was made by webbot last year and I know the date is wrong. I just thought i'd bring to light that the "ill winds" are connectable to the Fukushima disaster. Also I don't think your Tornado analogy can be used in the same way to describe the death of over one billion people, as tornados happen all the time, a "mega death" does not.

I think my tornado analogy is appropriate here. Yes tornadoes do happen all the time, but what you see very few of are F5's that will wipe out a whole town. You won't get a billion deaths, but that is not the point I was trying to make. Tornadoes happen often in very rural areas where they do not do much damage and you get very little if any loss of life. However, every now and again they hit a populated area. An F5 tornado does not happen very often, much less in a populated area. So if I were to make a prediction that an F5 tornado would hit a populated area sometime 1989 and it did not happen, then in 1991 you get



Could I then say I was right I just had the date wrong?



We can suggest that Web Bot just got the date wrong and this incident is the "ill winds" it talks about, but could we not say the same thing after the Volcanoes in Iceland blew and they shut down the airports all across the UK because of it? Anyone could have easily said, "This is the ill winds Web bot said was coming!" There are a million predictions every year, do you have any idea how many could be called correct and accurate predictions if one could claim the date is wrong but the prediction is still right? If Web Bot says the world will end in 2013 and nothing happens, should I live in fear until it does cause maybe Web Bot got the date wrong? Getting the date wrong on a prediction means the prediction did not come to pass. By definition it is a failed prediction.

"Ill winds" sounds like a pretty spot on ornate description of like, waves sent by haarp.

Originally posted by jude11
I know there are a lot of people out there that believe in it, but I just can't wrap my head around our society seriously looking to a BOT for answers to life, the universe and everything.

The answer was solved before Webbot anyway.

Not trying to discredit anything...just sayin

Well it looks at us humans from an outside perspective which we as humans can't see because we are humans and live on this planet.....

It's the next closes thing to having an alien analyze us and give us advice.

If you don't think Obama is evil enough to pull this off you are crazy. I hate every bit of him and I know he hates me too.

How can web bot predict something that hasn't happened yet?

I mean, it doesn't make sense.

Originally posted by ALOSTSOUL
reply to post by Namaste1001

 

I know that all prediction come out after the fact.

I just thought i'd bring it up because I believe that the "ill winds" part of the prediction holds some meaning with what going on at Fukushima.

ALS

ILL WINDS is absolutely a term that describes this Nuke Disaster

and NO, NOT ALL predictions come out after the fact...

SOLLOG AND 9NANIA's predictions were CLEAR BEFORE THE EVENT and gave an EXACT DATE... The only 2 prophet/psychic/mystics on the planet who warned about the Japan Quake and Nuke Disaster other than the webbots unique use of the term ILL WIND.

maya12-21-2012.com...

Originally posted by MrWendal
We can suggest that Web Bot just got the date wrong and this incident is the "ill winds" it talks about, but could we not say the same thing after the Volcanoes in Iceland blew and they shut down the airports all across the UK because of it? Anyone could have easily said, "This is the ill winds Web bot said was coming!" There are a million predictions every year, do you have any idea how many could be called correct and accurate predictions if one could claim the date is wrong but the prediction is still right? If Web Bot says the world will end in 2013 and nothing happens, should I live in fear until it does cause maybe Web Bot got the date wrong? Getting the date wrong on a prediction means the prediction did not come to pass. By definition it is a failed prediction.

edit on 3-4-2011 by MrWendal because: (no reason given)

Sollog and 9nania GOT THE DATE and LOCATION RIGHT for the Japan Quake and hit the Nuke Disaster as well.

glad you agree if these prophets have been validated.

Originally posted by Ozscot
For me the real important part of the original post is the reference to the map showing radioactive dispersion globally AS IT IS NOW. Don't be lulled into a false sense of security because the fall out is weak currently - I think the OP knows what I mean as he acknowledges that this reflects the current situation. If things deteriorate at Fukushima however - you're staring at a map which shows just how quickly and easily radioactivity disperses across the globe. That's actually pretty damned worrying.

Oz

Ya like this .... I think we're FUKushiMUD

www.irsn.fr...


www.abovetopsecret.com...
some snippets and commentary from the thread...

It's the model for Cesium-137 detection.
And it's showing the fallout since the accident on 3/11 until today.
While it is bad and looks really really bad, the lighter colors are almost undetectable by most instruments whereas the darker colors are concentrated and are more localized to the site of the reactors.

They should have buried that place with lead, concrete and TONS of AEROGEL as soon as they could gain access to the place!!! We are ALL (elites included) now victims of our own device.

Modeling the dispersion of radioactive releases into the atmosphere globally - Update March 30, 2011
From the estimated releases from IRSN, France Weather modeled the atmospheric dispersion of radioactive releases from great distances. This model has been updated and it can project the dispersion in air releases of the accident Fukushima worldwide, until 1 April 2011.

Since March 12, 2011, the plume resulting from discharges from nuclear reactor accident at the Fukushima moves, while thinner, air currents in the northern hemisphere. The IRSN has a model of this dispersion, in collaboration with Meteo France, which allows it to monitor and anticipate this shift (see below).

According to this model, the plume was covered in the day on Friday, March 18, 2011 the greater part of North America and north-eastern Siberia. He then turned over the North Atlantic and reached mainland France March 23, 2011.

Yes, and I am also reading that plutonium cannot be detected by the typical Geiger counters that are out there, is that correct?
www.tennessean.com... 7Chead
Indeed. I recently saw this and it disturbed me greatly... although it isn't a shocker. This is, of course, the very same EPA that claimed the air around Ground Zero was safe to breathe

www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.youtube.com...

enenews.com...

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
How can web bot predict something that hasn't happened yet?

I mean, it doesn't make sense.

Think Gerald Celente on crack, then you have the Web Bot. There is no computer program that scans the internet for key words and somehow ingeniously and magically forms them into elaborate concepts that predict the future. The so called program is just an excuse for when their retarded asses get things wrong... They can say, oh well, our program isn't perfect. They are playing everyone like a damn piano. An evil organ piano of doom, and they are laughing all the way to the bank.