reply to post by caf1550
because everything in the bible is true right?
From my understanding and personal research, yes.
im not trying to attack your religon at all because my mother is very religous she is roman catholic, i have been confirmed but im sorry im no
longer religous
I'm not religious either, no big deal.
just after everything the church has done in the name of "god" its inexcusable
Humans do not set a very good example for what a child of God should be, it's true. No argument here.
the crusades, sex abuse of catholic priests, the spanish inquisition, wars the list goes on whenever there is a war or natural disaster people
always will say that we are in the end times and revelation has begun
I really don't understand why people throw the Crusades around to 'put down' Christians. Were there no tears shed for the 3000+ Christians
massacred just prior to the start of the Crusades? The idea of the Crusades was an end to the infidels, or Moslems, who, I assure you, are not
peaceful people.
In today's world, we really have 2 types of Muslims: Cultural and Radical. The same can be said for any "religion", really. Cultural Muslims are
those raised in an environment
where they have NO choice but to follow this Muslim religion, in case you didn't know, it's basically a law in
many, many countries to be anything other than a Muslim. Penalty is death. Christians die every day from persecution in said countries, but I'm
getting off track here..
The other type is a Radical Muslim. These existed far more in ancient times than they do today, but they still exist. By their faith, they are
commanded to kill any and all enemies of Muslim teachings, Christians and Jews are their main priority. This isn't some horrific notion someone just
decided to do, it is written in their very Qur'an, it was preached openly by Mohammad; he practiced and made examples of the very thing "Allah"
instructed him to do - behead the enemies of Muslim.
My point here, is that the Crusades were an act of retaliation for the betterment and safekeeping of Christians and Jews everywhere. Easily
justifiable.
during the black death in europe people probably thought the world was going to end during ww1 ww2 the crusades people probably thought the
world was going to end, just because a book says something doesn't mean its always true
You may be missing the point here; it isn't the Bible's fault, it's Humans' fault. The Bible foretells what you will see when the end is near;
natural disasters, wars and rumors of wars, plague and famine.. so yes, I agree that whenever something like this happens, people believe it to be the
end of the world. This is Human error.
Many of these events were terrifying, indeed.
The difference is the scale on which they occurred. Today, Natural Disasters, wars/rumors of wars, plagues/famines are FAR WORSE than they have ever
been in the history of mankind. In my life alone I have witnessed several terrifying events that classify as "the worst that's ever happened in
history of x", i.e., the 9/11 attacks, Katrina, Earthquakes (Japan, New Zealand, Haiti, Chile, Sumatra, Somoa, all of these were the worst they've
ever had), viruses that are immune to anti-biotics now appearing more and more rapidly, and indeed, the rumors of World War 3 are extremely
terrifying, as it has the potential to end all life as we know it.
Point here: The Bible choose to tell of these events, but people mistake one bad thing happening for the end of the world, repeat a few hundred times,
and of course you'll have nay-sayers when the real end comes (Bible says so itself, naturally).
Should the Bible have chosen NOT to prophesy the end of times? What then? Would we have the same problems we do today?
again im not trying to attack your beliefs because you have every right to believe what you want
As do you, brother.