Here is my personal opinion on this idea.
Many of us are ethically and morally compelled to act upon the information we receive, when we sincerely believe that action must be taken. Some of
us are inclined to disbelieve that action based on internet-derived information is wise. Other are nearly immovable consumers of information, and
cannot be moved to act because they really really don't want to be involved in that way.
The argument about an action forum, or collection of active members, nearly always centers around this idea of 'required action'. We must never
forget, however, that we are a diverse group of people, spread over a wide area, and relying on our community at ATS for more than flash and populism.
They get enough of that from the controlled mainstream media and the talking heads and celebrities in political theater.
But there is a maxim that rings true in both the natural world and the social one. Every action evokes and equal and opposite reaction. And herein
lies our responsibility to the community:
Speaking strictly for myself; I do not accept that the causes which some members may embrace are my own. I explicitly do not assume that my outrage
should be thrust upon another who "has no dog in the fight". I am no judge of men and the world - which is to say that I am not ashamed to be
ignorant of facts, or just plain wrong about things.... in fact - that's why I am here, seeking the opportunity to learn.
Should we - as a community - decide to take sides and start activist movements or engage in public activities designed to confront or promote ideals;
there will always be those who will naturally be 'against' that position. depending on the rationality and spirit of the action, this could lead to
confrontations and render our community a target for the offensive undertaking of those with whom we disagree.
Say, for example, that we felt the involvement of Wikileaks in releasing the secret diplomatic cables was wrong and we campaigned publicly against the
group... how long would it be before we are met with hacking attacks and duplicitous members generally running amok in our 'home?' Say we support the
act as one of disclosure and transparency... how long before those threatened by such a stance labelled our members 'potential' threats to their order
and potentially cast us in future judgments in a bad light?
What's even worse... you and I can disagree vehemently about something.. but as long as we are within the T&C we are assured of respect and equal
standing to discuss the matter. When you get into populist movements and activism... that will virtually guarantee conflict... and regardless of who
is right or who is wrong (if such a thing can be claimed) it will be the disinterested members of the community who suffer... because the "cause" is
not theirs, but the field of engagement is where they live.
All of this is to say that I disagree that such a forum should exist.
But this is just my opinion, and much to my chagrin, because there are causes which I find worthy.... but I just have to remember that they are MY
causes, not those of the entire ATS community. And I refuse to debase this environment with campaigning and proselytizing over matters which a large
portion of our community doesn't support. As I have often said before - I come here to discuss and learn, not persuade and recruit.
edit on
30-3-2011 by Maxmars because: (no reason given)