Total Information Awareness
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
Only the admins could speak authoritatively on such questions as server log retention and details of possible government interaction with ATS, but
that won't stop me from offering my (admittedly less informed) opinions as a mod, for what little they may be worth.
Regarding server logs, I know
SkepticOverlord (aka "SO") has publicly mentioned that he takes special steps to minimize the amount of detailed
connection data kept, and that it is discarded rather quickly by industry standards. Some data is kept for statistical and administrative purposes,
but I think most of it makes its way to tbe bit bucket fairly fast.
That said, the nature of discussion boards is that our account data and posts are, by design, kept indefinitely. So who said what, how and when is in
the forums for all to see, and if it came to something incriminating, that's what would matter most, anyway.
More broadly, the
AT&T/NSA Narus Collaboration Imbroglio and its unpublished variants
suggest that much, most or possibly
all Internet traffic is monitored by the NSA. In light of some rather interesting behavior out of China and
several other countries as well, it's also safe to assume the U.S. government isn't the only government that monitors Internet traffic, nor that
governments are the only groups that monitor traffic, for that matter (i.e., Google).
Considering the amazing amount of surveillance literally built in to the Internet, it would be foolish to assume anyone using it has anything
approaching real privacy. Rather, and I strongly recommend this, it is much better to assume
everything you do via an Internet connection is
being monitored and act accordingly.
That specifically means avoiding participation in illegal activity online and, considering the rather high profile of ATS and the fact that it's
against the rules, trying to pursue criminal objectives here would be extremely
unwise.
ATS is the best place to discuss conspiracies, and the worst place to plot them.
Enemy Of The State
I don't know of any actual DDOS or hack attempts by any government agencies on ATS. That doesn't mean they haven't happened, or that the idea hasn't
been bandied about. I know SO has mentioned we get a lot of visitors from government domains, but I suspect that's mostly personal interest rather
than official business.
Genuine "professional interest" or attacks on ATS by government agencies would undoubtedly disguise their origins, since it would be asinine not to do
so. That said, there was the Juniper Three fiasco (tucked away in RATS somewhere, I believe) which, due precisely to its absurdity, was probably just
some government servant with too much time on his hands and inadequate adult supervision.
But when all is said and done, I can't really see why a government would want to shut us down. Most of what we do is gather and discuss information
from other sources on the Internet. We specifically prohibit illegal activity, discourage disclosure of personal information and generally focus on
what
other people are doing, rather than ourselves.
Compared to other "target rich" sites that specialize in hacking, piracy, drugs, porn, gangs, jihad, militias, smuggling, violent protests, etc., (all
of which are almost certainly monitored very closely) ATS is probably not of much professional interest to law enforcement or governments in general.
There's already plenty of people out there advertising their desirability as surveillance subjects, and compared to them, we're practically saints.
That doesn't mean we should be complacent, nor that we should assume complacency on the part of governments toward what we talk about here, but rather
that it's good to keep some perspective.
Disinformation Management
I will say that I sometimes wonder if some members are here "on business" due to their behavior. The accusation of "disinfo agent" is common enough to
be a tired cliche around here, and such claims are almost always completely spurious -- enough so to render them meaningless. Plus,
personal commentary violates the rules anyway, so it's somewhat moot.
Making a determination harder is that it's normal for pretty much anyone to have some sort of passion or agenda that brings them here. Simon's Area 51
articles first caught my eye many years ago, and we have many longstanding members who are experts on all sorts of subjects. Of course even experts
can still be wrong, so simple disagreement really doesn't prove anyone is here to deliberately spread false information.
What catches my attention are members, often new but sometimes on old "sleeper accounts", who come along at certain times when a topic is hot in the
news, and
all they do is spam vast amounts of information on that one topic, all of which conforms to one side of the story. Again, that in
itself may just mean strong opinions and passionate interest, but there are other signs.
Specifically, they may try to gather personal data from members (e.g., names, email addresses, etc.) in the form of "petitions" or other kinds of
solicitation, try to goad other members into incriminating behavior, attack members who disagree with them and disrupt threads that put forth ideas
that differ from theirs. All of these activities, not so coincidentally, violate the
terms & conditions, which is worth noting.
Sometimes it seems thorough enough to be professional, but even then, sometimes a troll is just a troll.
In the end, it doesn't matter what the motive is or whether it's government-sponsored, because the eventual outcome for people who, whether on
"official business" or not,
repeatedly and intentionally disrupt topical
discussion is the same:
Which is why it ultimately makes sense to focus on what we do best and not worry about who's watching, because what we do best isn't illegal, and as
long as enough of us keep each other informed around the world, hopefully it will stay that way.
edit on 3/28/2011 by Majic because: (no reason given)