It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
And this, Masonic Light would argue, is one point where Pike was wrong. Or, at least, he was mislead and in later books changed his stance on that relationship. Coincidentally this is the origin of the oft quoted Pike passage about low level Masons being mislead by high level Masons. He wrote that because the blue lodge degrees don't mention the Templars at all, and he was told (incorrectly) later that there WAS a connection. He considered the lack of education on the Templar topic to the blue lodge degrees an example of omission based on rank. But, again, he was wrong.
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
Not according to Albert Pike in Morals and Dogma. I have read it twice.
No Mason should consider Pike's word as gospel anyway. As others have written, it's just one man's opinion.
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
Albert Pike was the founder of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry.
Oh, I fully admit they admire the legends. But I think that's pretty much the most anyone can prove. Morgan published in 1826. The Templars were disbanded by the church in 1314. That's 500 years in between.
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
That could be. I am not a Mason, but I have studied the history of the Aleutian mysteries and there is a clear connection. Also, how do we explain the references in so many materials coming from the Freemasons? The book below as an example. If there is no direct connection, they sure do admire the legends. It seems to be a direct connection to me.
THE Mysteries of Freemasonry
CONTAINING ALL THE DEGREES OF THE ORDER CONFERRED
IN A MASTER'S LODGE,
AS WRITTEN BY
CAPTAIN WILLIAM MORGAN.
All the Degrees Conferred in the Royal Arch Chapter and
Grand Encampment of Knights Templars—Knights
of the Red Cross—of the Christian Mark—and
of the Holy Sepulchre.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
Oh, I fully admit they admire the legends. But I think that's pretty much the most anyone can prove. Morgan published in 1826. The Templars were disbanded by the church in 1314. That's 500 years in between.
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
That could be. I am not a Mason, but I have studied the history of the Aleutian mysteries and there is a clear connection. Also, how do we explain the references in so many materials coming from the Freemasons? The book below as an example. If there is no direct connection, they sure do admire the legends. It seems to be a direct connection to me.
THE Mysteries of Freemasonry
CONTAINING ALL THE DEGREES OF THE ORDER CONFERRED
IN A MASTER'S LODGE,
AS WRITTEN BY
CAPTAIN WILLIAM MORGAN.
All the Degrees Conferred in the Royal Arch Chapter and
Grand Encampment of Knights Templars—Knights
of the Red Cross—of the Christian Mark—and
of the Holy Sepulchre.
It seems more likely that the people who were writing the degrees that became the upper numbers in both the York and Scottish Rite systems were enlightenment and post-enlightenment era gentlemen, pining for chivalric virtues and really wanting to style themselves as "knights". You'll also see that timing-wise the creation of some of the degrees coincides with the popular rise of egyptology, so you'll see a lot of stylized Egyptian art in some lodges as well.
But nobody has been able to identify an unbroken chain of teaching going back 700+ years, much less 2000+ years.
I haven't read Enoch, but he does figure in to Masonic teachings. Both the York & Scottish Rites have degrees where the nine vaults of Enoch are unearthed by Templars and a cube with God's name inscribed is found. Curiously, the word found is different between the two Rites... (From what I understand. I haven't gone through the York Rite system yet...)
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
Have you ever read Enoch I? He lived 365 years, but walked with God between heaven and earth as a messenger for 300.