It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Home-owning, self-reliance, a decent job for life, nice holidays, a taste for authenticity and real "experiences" came to define us. What we bought, rather than what we produced, became our core identity. As any fule kno, or OK, any old Marxist, this is not what social class actually means. This is reducing class to the trivia of etiquette and consumer power.
The problem now is that mere aspiration, middle-class or not, is not enough. As if it ever was. The much-derided aspiration of the young – to become famous without necessarily having any talent – is no less nutty than many current political aspirations. We are to have growth without investment. Daft. We are all to stand tall and proud while we lop off the limbs of the public sector. Crazy.
Originally posted by rebeldog
reply to post by HunkaHunka
if you think everyone can be rich you are truly a doofuss.. there can only be rich people if there are poor people. think of a pendulum.
sure everyone can be a millionaire but then it would be like zimbabwe where a can of corn cost say $5,000.
do you actually believe anyone/everyone can be rich.
p.s., im not calling you a doofuss, just someone who thinks anyone or everyone can be "rich".
Originally posted by rebeldog
reply to post by HunkaHunka
being rich means to have more than others right?
like a guy with $10,000,000 is a rich guy.(5% of the population0
a guy with $10,000 is at least not a rich guy (the rest)
a rich guy has a rolls royce, mansions, lake house, neach house, kids go to 40k a year boarding school, etc
how can everyone have that.. i am really confused. unless you mean everyone can change their name to richard, then yes, everyone can be rich