It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

ATS's Boondock-Saint for US President - Would you vote for me ???

page: 25
67
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 01:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by cushycrux
I have no question, but I have an forgotten video for you, holding the truth. Please listen exactly.

thanks for the vid
but I would disagree
everybody needs a hero.
It gives them hope and aspiration.



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 01:45 PM
link   
Why is ATS home to so many egotistical pricks?


:shk:



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 01:50 PM
link   
reply to post by nightbringr
 

I am not arrogant and I was not calling you ignorant.
I was simply urging you to
seek out the difference on your own.

And I have already stated in my prior posts,
the possible scenarios are endless so there is
no need at the present time to give a reaction
to every single one of them. But if you insist
on being an @r$ehole and pursue this fictional
scenario, then I would consider non-violent
means of arbitration with China through
dialogue. If dialogue failed then pursue
sanctions on China, then urge the UN to
impose Sanctions on China as well. Then
if those did not work, then a total boycott
of Chinese goods and services. And if
every other means of diplomacy failed
as a last resort, military action through
the UN.



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 01:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by antar
Have had some glitches in my comp's ability to function, just getting back to ya.

I could possibly get the bumper stickers ordered...

As for the appointment, I will take my position seriously and promise to lead the the charge in complete transparency, that is unless it is classified, in which case I will still release the info with blacked out pages! Good idea?


Disclosure of UFO's and Aliens
are not something that I think
needs blackening out. Course you
may be busy for the next hundred
yrs with FOIA requests so you will have
a huge job in front of you



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 02:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by nightbringr
Might i ask you since you seem to be throwing your hat in the ring by making policy declarations id like to ask you this:

-How would Israeli/US relations fare under your administration and would Israeli/US citizens enjoy the same freedoms as anyone else?

-Would you allow free elections when your term ended?

-Would jackboots and brown shirts be on permanent discount?


1) Like I have stated before, I am not anti-semite and I think
having a good relationship with Israel is good business. However,
it would be my intention to introduce legislation that would prevent
dual citizenship in the US Government. You would have to make a choice
as to where your loyalty lies in order to hold a Fed Gov position.
This would also affect a lot of congressmen as well. I have no problem
with a congressmen being Jewish, or Christian or even Islamic.
It is a matter of which flag that congressman is loyal to that
concerns me. Holding a citizenship outside of the US is a barrier
to the good intent of his/her actions being representative of
the constituents they represent. Israeli Citizens did not vote
them into office, Americans did. Being a partial Israeli Citizen
provides a conflict of interest for the American people.

2) Yes, I would allow free elections. The constitution only allows
me to serve a single 4-yr term without re-election. I am not nor will
I ever be a dictator.

3) I do not understand what a brown shirt is, so I can't answer
your third question.

And I am a lil concerned over your line of questioning.
You seem to focus on the Israeli agenda primarily so I
have to wonder where your loyalties lie ???



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 02:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheOracle
Well I'd vote for you if Ron Paul or Benevolent Heretic arent on the ballots

fair enough.
I will not hold it against you for your
decision and I admire your honesty

best wishes

boon



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 02:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by blupblup
Why is ATS home to so many egotistical pricks?
:shk:

I am assuming your rant is aimed at me
so I will ignore the question. Ask in a
civil manner and you will get civil answers.



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 02:30 PM
link   
Is this a middle school project?



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 02:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by spinalremain
Is this a middle school project?

or maybe you missed the day
in school where it teaches you
to contribute instead of disrupt.



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   
Mamabeth reporting for duty sir,how may I serve you?
We really need to make some serious plans for your
campaign.
You do not want me on your budget committee,I like
to shop.
Is there anything that I can do to help?



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 03:36 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Thank you. That was the response i was looking for on my second point.

My first one you have disregarded altogether and im unsure why. I am very aware how a lobby group works, and i am also aware of freedom of speech and all that it entails.

Are you implying lobby groups overstep their bounds and are no longer excersizing their right of free speech? Are you impying there is somthing criminal about they way they operate? If not, what is it then you are getting at? It really is a very simply question and i do not understand your answers. A president should be clear and concise. Answering questions in an unintelligible manner, or simply telling people to educate themselves does not inspire confidence in your abilities. Obviously my questions to you have come to an end as you do not feel the need to answer.



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by nightbringr
Might i ask you since you seem to be throwing your hat in the ring by making policy declarations id like to ask you this:

-How would Israeli/US relations fare under your administration and would Israeli/US citizens enjoy the same freedoms as anyone else?

-Would you allow free elections when your term ended?

-Would jackboots and brown shirts be on permanent discount?


1) Like I have stated before, I am not anti-semite and I think
having a good relationship with Israel is good business. However,
it would be my intention to introduce legislation that would prevent
dual citizenship in the US Government. You would have to make a choice
as to where your loyalty lies in order to hold a Fed Gov position.
This would also affect a lot of congressmen as well. I have no problem
with a congressmen being Jewish, or Christian or even Islamic.
It is a matter of which flag that congressman is loyal to that
concerns me. Holding a citizenship outside of the US is a barrier
to the good intent of his/her actions being representative of
the constituents they represent. Israeli Citizens did not vote
them into office, Americans did. Being a partial Israeli Citizen
provides a conflict of interest for the American people.

2) Yes, I would allow free elections. The constitution only allows
me to serve a single 4-yr term without re-election. I am not nor will
I ever be a dictator.

3) I do not understand what a brown shirt is, so I can't answer
your third question.

And I am a lil concerned over your line of questioning.
You seem to focus on the Israeli agenda primarily so I
have to wonder where your loyalties lie ???


If you go back to my original post, you will see it was aimed at Felonius. He stated his agenda so i though i would ask him questions. I did not imply you were an anti-semite, but perhap i am of him, as his post was extremely right-wing and his avatar looks disturbingly National Socialist. Im not sure why, if its the german colors, the Iron Cross or a combination of both. Ill get labelled as stereotyping him for that but hey, in for ounce, in for a pound!



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 04:01 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Are you able to make decisions based on population. If you had to chose could you chose to let some population die in order to sustain remaining population...... Or do you decide to let ALL die together and show no favors? Your answer will determine my vote!
edit on 3/28/11 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 05:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
Are you able to make decisions based on population. If you had to chose could you chose to let some population die in order to sustain remaining population...... Or do you decide to let ALL die together and show no favors? Your answer will determine my vote!


there are no favorites.
All men, women and children are created
equal under God.



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 05:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by nightbringr
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Thank you. That was the response i was looking for on my second point.

My first one you have disregarded altogether and im unsure why. I am very aware how a lobby group works, and i am also aware of freedom of speech and all that it entails.

Are you implying lobby groups overstep their bounds and are no longer excersizing their right of free speech? Are you impying there is somthing criminal about they way they operate? If not, what is it then you are getting at? It really is a very simply question and i do not understand your answers. A president should be clear and concise. Answering questions in an unintelligible manner, or simply telling people to educate themselves does not inspire confidence in your abilities. Obviously my questions to you have come to an end as you do not feel the need to answer.


you are not asking questions,
you are probing in order for me
to reveal to you my strategy to combat
lobbyist. And I will not tell you my strategy
cuz you don't call crooks to let them know
you're showing up with a search warrant
or the evidence and culprit disappears.
But nice try and I'm not ignorant either.

A generalization is all you need to know.
The details will be revealed by the
prosecution in a court of law under
due process.



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by mamabeth
Mamabeth reporting for duty sir,how may I serve you?
We really need to make some serious plans for your
campaign.
You do not want me on your budget committee,I like
to shop.
Is there anything that I can do to help?

sorry mamabeth we're still in the exploratory phase
of the campaign. It's not looking too good at the
moment, without an actual head count of
American voters, I would have to say there are
more No's than Yes's. But it may turn around.
We will have to wait and see.



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 05:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by SpartanKingLeonidas
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Skull and Bones or The Russell Trust foundation might control Obama but who controls you?

No, no one has to necessarily control you, but who is to say you do not have skeletons in your closet?

Therefore having the capability to control you through political blackmail.


No questions?


Originally posted by boondock-saint
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
 


ummm I didn't see a question in your response.
mainly all I saw was preaching.

boon


Sure looks like a question.

Excuse me, two questions, and plenty of discussion to go with it.

Preaching?

No, stating plenty of sound points, debating your lack of information in the opening post.

Sound points, as in clear points, not as in sound bytes like your clipped replies to me gave.

Instead of focusing one your misgauged lack of question you might have replied to it all.
edit on 3/28/11 by SpartanKingLeonidas because: Adding Depth and Insight Into the Post.



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 05:30 PM
link   
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
 

Skull and Bones or The Russell Trust foundation might control Obama but who controls you?

The one and only true God.



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 05:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by nightbringr
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Thank you. That was the response i was looking for on my second point.

My first one you have disregarded altogether and im unsure why. I am very aware how a lobby group works, and i am also aware of freedom of speech and all that it entails.

Are you implying lobby groups overstep their bounds and are no longer excersizing their right of free speech? Are you impying there is somthing criminal about they way they operate? If not, what is it then you are getting at? It really is a very simply question and i do not understand your answers. A president should be clear and concise. Answering questions in an unintelligible manner, or simply telling people to educate themselves does not inspire confidence in your abilities. Obviously my questions to you have come to an end as you do not feel the need to answer.


you are not asking questions,
you are probing in order for me
to reveal to you my strategy to combat
lobbyist. And I will not tell you my strategy
cuz you don't call crooks to let them know
you're showing up with a search warrant
or the evidence and culprit disappears.
But nice try and I'm not ignorant either.

A generalization is all you need to know.
The details will be revealed by the
prosecution in a court of law under
due process.


If you say so.

But the thing is, you WONT be elected president, so i dont see the harm in telling me or anyone else your strategy.

Your simply avoiding a simple question. I assume you are going to abolish lobby groups and that sounds a lot like a stiffling of the freedom of speech to me. I can only make assumtions since you have given me nothing to work with on that one issue. Its actually one of the easiest questions i asked so i simply do not understand your stonewalling.



posted on Mar, 28 2011 @ 05:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by nightbringr
But the thing is, you WONT be elected president, so i dont see the harm in telling me or anyone else your strategy.

thank you !!!
that's all the negativity that I need
to hear to ignore any further
questions from you.




top topics



 
67
<< 22  23  24    26  27  28 >>

log in

join