US warplane shot down in Libya!!!

I just heard that a us bomber jet was shot down...i havent found a direst link to it yet but will work on it unless someone else can find one first...i guess in pilot was rescued by rebel forces and is safe...i didnt know that our fighter planes were a part of this mess? i guess one more thing we were being lied to about...

reply to post by gdaub23


It was a Libyan rebel plane, not a US one

Here is your link

And here is the Us plane shot down story. link

But it was mechanical failure, not shot down

Vvv







Vvv

reply to post by VreemdeVlieendeVoorwep


it was a us f 15 not a rebel...they were rescued by rebels...they are saying its mechanical but we know its a lie...

It was an f15 fighter jet btw

US warplane crash-lands in Libya

there is another thread in the breaking news forum but this is the correct area for the thread

they didnt crash land they had to eject there was no landing...one of them has only been rescued...but what if the wrong people get ahold of the other one?would we send in troops to retrieve him? and would that cause a more escalating scenario for us if so?

and now they are both in US hands...so whats that mean? that we do have troops on the ground after we have been yold that there wouldnt be?

Originally posted by gdaub23
and now they are both in US hands...so whats that mean? that we do have troops on the ground after we have been yold that there wouldnt be?

It means a rescue chopper would have been flown in ASAP from 1 of the many Naval ship sitting of the coast of Libya no doubt with special forces on board, as thats just what they do

reply to post by BRITWARRIOR


i just thinks its ridiculas that there was one of our planes there in the first place...if it wouldnt have been then there wouldnt have been any reason for anybody to go in to get them...they are just looking for excuses to roll in...

Well it shouldn't be there anyway.

Quite clearly Libya's arsenal isn't a push over. but that's because its also Germany's and Russia's and China's and Korea's and Frances....... Sounds more and more like there is some form of defense on the ground that prevents certain armies attempting to occupy the land.

reply to post by gdaub23


yep, the pilot ejected and landed right into the safe hands of the rebels as planned

meanwhile us media will show images of the downed plane.

drumsofwar.mp3

This is getting messier by the hour it seems.There is obviously a great deal we are not being told......Dont think the Libyans dont have shoulder fired anti aircraft rockets or truck mounted ones either.....
There could well be some more losses yet.
This could get expensive real fast.

this is their planned window for putting feet on the ground...i wouldnt be surprised if they shot down their own plane to cause the mess

reply to post by gdaub23


Guys, we have a LOT of airplanes participating in this Libya thing … if you didn’t know that, then frankly you haven’t been watching the news very much! They’ve been talking about how the US has “unique capabilities” that our allies don’t have. Like, B2 stealth bombers flew all the way from Missouri to hit targets in Libya. We also have command and control aircraft (AWACS) and surveillance aircraft that track electronic signals, and planes that can detect moving targets on the ground (remember the air force hitting tanks during a dust storm in Iraq?). Our allies don’t have these.
The F-15 was not shot down … the Libyans don’t have anything left to hit it with except anti-aircraft guns and pilots aren’t stupid -- they don’t fly low enough to be hit by gunfire. F-15s are so old they are known to fall apart in the sky (one broke apart off the coast of Florida not many years ago).
We don’t have troops on the ground. The pilots are in US hands because immediately when a US plane goes down we have pararescue jumpers (PJs) on the move to pick them up. PJs are air force special forces trained specifically in going in fast and undetected to rescue downed pilots. They are vey good at what they do. They probably launched their helicopter from a ship right off the coast and the pilots are now on the ship.
If you don’t think our planes should be there then you should tell your Congressman who represents you in the government. Or don’t vote to elect a president who sends our military into war without a clear objective.

If US/NATO is saying it was shot down, it could be a false flag to invade Libya.

If the U.S. denies it and says it is mechanical failure, it really could have been shot down.

reply to post by KittyM


Well im thinking that theres something fishy about this and i guess we'll have to see if others happen to try for an excuse to go in....another i dont vote and really nobodys vote counts..."they pick who goes into office. we dont...we dont have any control on that matter...we dont decide what retarded monkey puppet becomes our president...

Originally posted by gdaub23
and now they are both in US hands...so whats that mean? that we do have troops on the ground after we have been yold that there wouldnt be?

There was an article yesterday that confirmed US and UK troops have been in Libya for over 3 weeks!

These airstrikes don't happen unless Spec Ops are on the ground painting the targets with lasers and calling in the strikes to avoid civilians. Our Spec Ops guys actually called off a bombing run from 7 UK aircraft 2 days ago, because civilians had been packed into the palace to use as human shields. They had to scrap the bombing run.

Yes, we are on the ground in Libya, and we have been for weeks!

reply to post by filosophia


Let me get this straight ... so if the US says it was shot down (which it's not), it is a lie to justify an invasion ...

But if the US says it WASN'T shot down, that it was mechanical failure, then it's a lie because we don't want to admit it was shot down?? When has the US denied one of its planes was shot down? Scott Speicher, shot down in Iraq ... Scott O'Grady, shot down in the Balkans ... many other examples exist. This isn't a covert operation ... why would the US deny a shoot-down if that's what happened? To save face? Come on.

So which conspiracy is it? Inquiring minds want to know.

Skeptical of Skeptics

Originally posted by gdaub23
reply to post by KittyM

 

Well im thinking that theres something fishy about this and i guess we'll have to see if others happen to try for an excuse to go in....another i dont vote and really nobodys vote counts..."they pick who goes into office. we dont...we dont have any control on that matter...we dont decide what retarded monkey puppet becomes our president...

I really hate to ask ... but who is the ominous "they" who supposedly pick our President because our votes don't count?

I applaud anybody who does not vote just because they can. I think far too many people vote who really haven't a clue what they are doing. Kudos to gdaub23 for making an intelligent choice not to vote.