Libyans are expendables on oil-rich battlefield

Libyans are expendables on oil-rich battlefield

rt.com

Political analysts say that protecting civilians in Libya is actually the allied coalition’s secondary priority. The primary one is eliminating the country’s defenses and gaining control over Libya’s oil-rich regions through civil war between tribes.
­The death toll is said to have reached 67, according to Libyan health officials.
­‘Civilian deaths are inevitable’ – ex-ambassador

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.telegraph.co.uk
www.smh.com.au
www.abc.net.au

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
The Libyan war: Unconstitutional and illegitimate

Before I begin to state my personal opinion, I'd like to state that this is an article posted on Russia Today. It is important to understand the journalistic bias.

I strongly agree with many of the view points presented in this article. It is interesting to see, America's reluctance to join conflicts such as Rawanda ever since their failure to spread democracy after the Soviet Collapse. Now, though it seems as if they are riding a wave of imaginary "hope" and "change". But(and this is the million dollar question) are they "hoping" to bring democracy to Libya and "change their lives" or are they "hoping" to secure oil reserves and "change" economic activities in Libya? Countries rarely ever enter wars in the aim to protect and save civillian life. Countries enter wars to secure national interests. Wether you choose to believe it or not, this has been the case in WWI, WWII, Vietnam and even Yugoslavia. So why is the West and Nato bombing Libya?

Killing civilians goes against the mandate of United Nations Security Council resolution 1973 – to protect civilians – he added. And while there is no doubt the allied forces will be successful in establishing a no-flight zone, Miles concluded, the question is how they will use their supremacy.

Keep in mind, The U.S is happy for your country to be a democracy and they are also happy for your country to be a dictatorship. They are happy for you, as long as your interests align with their interests.

­The Arab League is a “collection of dictators, kings and presidents, all of them puppets of the US, but they are backing down because of the unbelievable hatred and outrage on the part of their own people for the fact that they went along with aggression against yet another Muslim Arab country,” argued Lew Rockwell, chairman of the Research and Educational Center at the US-based Ludwig von Mises Institute.

rt.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

RT has got it right , CIA and egyptian black ops destabilised libya . this was always for oil .

oil of libya has low extraction costs of 1$/bbl lesser than Saudi Arabia and west destabilizing all those zones where Chinese have investments

Israel has seen an increase in rocket attacks, I wonder if things will spiral out of control in that area of the Middle-East, Iran and Syria might come into play, this whole thing is a house of cards, with the worlds powers blowing whatever way.

We are all expendable.
Our governments care little for us all

Oil is the world reserve currency. And yes all people are expendable as long as the rich and powerful get their control.

They don't need 6 billion of us working for them. A few hundred would be ideal. Killing off 95% of the world population never looked better.

Might wanna take a look at those Georgia Guidestones again.

The objective is OIL.

It is all so obvious, if Somalia has OIL, you will see Somalia occupies by now.

reply to post by SpeachM1litant


I keep seeing this accusation carted out every time the US becomes involved in some action in the Middle East. People say it's the reason we invaded Iraq, the reason we're in Libya, etc. If this were true, why am I still paying so much for gas? The price for oil has gone UP, not DOWN since the operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. How can people keep saying that we invaded the countries for oil and not have people just laughing at them for saying this?

reply to post by BriggsBU


It's all about control. There are massive oil reserves in Alaska and the Rocky Mountains which the global elite keep off limits.

THEY WANT YOU TO PAY BIG MONEY. Even if there is enough oil for 1000 years to come. They have to make sure they control the supply. Once they control that, THEY set the price.

And we pay for it, whatever they tell us to pay.

Now they are counting the death toll. 67 Kaddafi supporters killed in UN action vs no mention of the untold thousands of Libyans Kaddafi's forces have killed since Feb 17. He killed more than 67 just the other day in Misrata and Jazza.

The real headline of this story is......

Kaddafi Sympathisers Turn to Hypocricount Death Tallies

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Kaddafi Sympathisers Turn to Hypocricount Death Tallies

I'm not familiar with this word ... hypocricount.

Does it refer to a hippopotamus who is good at math?

Originally posted by zuul000

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Kaddafi Sympathisers Turn to Hypocricount Death Tallies

I'm not familiar with this word ... hypocricount.

Does it refer to a hippopotamus who is good at math?

No, it refers to people with agendas who are really bad at math.
5000 + 67 = 67 in their world.

Originally posted by TinfoilTP

Originally posted by zuul000

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Kaddafi Sympathisers Turn to Hypocricount Death Tallies

I'm not familiar with this word ... hypocricount.

Does it refer to a hippopotamus who is good at math?

No, it refers to people with agendas who are really bad at math.
5000 + 67 = 67 in their world.

When the US started bombing Serbia in 1999 the White House and media said 400,000 Kosovars had died.

A 2002 study by UNICEF showed that roughly 2,500 had been killed.

sheeple indeed ...

expendable is right
there is NO humanitarian about it
or the US would have had regime change at WACO

"They" are also after the water
the builderbergers are cornering water
an Libya just built the mother of all water systems

Saint Lazare Investment will be the largest owner of aquatic property and will thus face the prerogatives of future international ecological policies from the point of view of an influential investor in the Carbon Finance marketplace.
Water will soon become an instrument of power and influence.
The Saint Lazare Foundation aims to become an essential global player specializing in water. Its strength and distinctiveness derive from the three pillars on which it stands:
■ A think tank
■ An investment source
■ A centre of operations
Affiliations:
United Nations
- World Water Forum
- World Water Council
- UNESCO
European Union
NGOs
- International Office for Water
- Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council
Vatican
The World Society
The World Society was created to finance the Saint Lazare Foundation.
The World Society is a global network, which offers unique advantages to its members. It comprises those men and women around the world who are part of the economic, financial, social or cultural elite. The World Society is one of the world’s most exclusive societies. Joining the World Society is a unique opportunity, a privilege. The future is water. The members of the World Society are among ‘the happy few’ who will become key players in the future of our planet.

z10.invisionfree.com...



if lybia were to be successfull all the african nations might rise up against the colonial oppression.
Can't have that

also they have frozen billions of libyan dollars
the banksters via the debt sunk brits and yanks needs that money to stay afloat
to continue their subjegation of the free world

Originally posted by zuul000

Originally posted by TinfoilTP

Originally posted by zuul000

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Kaddafi Sympathisers Turn to Hypocricount Death Tallies

I'm not familiar with this word ... hypocricount.

Does it refer to a hippopotamus who is good at math?

No, it refers to people with agendas who are really bad at math.
5000 + 67 = 67 in their world.

When the US started bombing Serbia in 1999 the White House and media said 400,000 Kosovars had died.

A 2002 study by UNICEF showed that roughly 2,500 had been killed.

sheeple indeed ...

www.hrw.org... de-charges

Milosevic is charged with a total of approximately 10,000 killings and 250,000 deportations in Bosnia.

www.dupage88.net... acher%20Assigns/Genocide/BosniaB.pdf

In 1995 a massive NATO bombing
campaign and the advancement of Muslim and Croat troops led ultimately to a peace accord. By this time, however,
over 200,000 Muslim civilians had been systematically murdered, more than 20,000 people were missing, and two
million people had become refugees.

You are guilty of the exact same thing, only using numbers of deaths from Allied intervention.
Hypocricount strike 2.

Originally posted by TinfoilTP

Originally posted by zuul000

Originally posted by TinfoilTP

Originally posted by zuul000

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Kaddafi Sympathisers Turn to Hypocricount Death Tallies

I'm not familiar with this word ... hypocricount.

Does it refer to a hippopotamus who is good at math?

No, it refers to people with agendas who are really bad at math.
5000 + 67 = 67 in their world.

When the US started bombing Serbia in 1999 the White House and media said 400,000 Kosovars had died.

A 2002 study by UNICEF showed that roughly 2,500 had been killed.

sheeple indeed ...

www.hrw.org... de-charges

Milosevic is charged with a total of approximately 10,000 killings and 250,000 deportations in Bosnia.

You are guilty of the exact same thing, only using numbers of deaths from Allied intervention.
Hypocricount strike 2.

1. 10,000 is still not 400,000
2. still have no idea what hypocricount means

Originally posted by zuul000

Originally posted by TinfoilTP

Originally posted by zuul000

Originally posted by TinfoilTP

Originally posted by zuul000

Originally posted by TinfoilTP
Kaddafi Sympathisers Turn to Hypocricount Death Tallies

I'm not familiar with this word ... hypocricount.

Does it refer to a hippopotamus who is good at math?

No, it refers to people with agendas who are really bad at math.
5000 + 67 = 67 in their world.

When the US started bombing Serbia in 1999 the White House and media said 400,000 Kosovars had died.

A 2002 study by UNICEF showed that roughly 2,500 had been killed.

sheeple indeed ...

www.hrw.org... de-charges

Milosevic is charged with a total of approximately 10,000 killings and 250,000 deportations in Bosnia.

You are guilty of the exact same thing, only using numbers of deaths from Allied intervention.
Hypocricount strike 2.

1. 10,000 is still not 400,000
2. still have no idea what hypocricount means

And yet you still fail to acknowledge the 200,000 death count. 10,000 is only what Milosevich was charged with being directly responsible for. It's like pulling teeth.