Rare video evidence of men in black (2010) ?

reply to post by Fenix777


All valid questions my friend!

What gets me thinking about the number plates is a car coming up the street on the road and from the cars driving down the street, you can see the number plates have a big white background with blue numbers and letters.

On the vans they are just dark, blank and missing and I know due to a friend owning a van, that when the number plate is off from when he was fixing it from an accident from the previous owner, it also has that dark blank patch.

well technically they are men and they are wearing black... but they don't necessarily have to be men in black. They can just be feds

I think this is one of the worst videos I've seen on ATS yet. The camera man never goes close enough to see who is in the van. You couldn't tell whether the occupants in the car were wearing suits. Let alone see how many are in the van, what sex they are.Nothing. Its just a video of two white vans. Isee no men in black, as I can hardly see anything, absolute waste of time.

Originally posted by FoxfilesMulder
Yeah and Ive been lurking on ATS long enough to know what to expect from everyone once you post a video related to ufology

Pity for you Ive ticked all the boxes and cant be implicated towards your belief in what this video shows.

You cant quote me as saying "This is a real video of MIB"

The video is what it is, nothing more nothing less.

The occupants of the house had a rather strange UFO sighting which you can read in full in one of my replies. The next day at 8 something AM, 2 unmarked white vans pull up and sit outside said house who have no number plates.

If you want to cry a river saying its just a white van, go for it, I don't care.

You cant bring me down.

The video IS what it IS. NOTHING more NOTHING less.

Your title says its evidence of MIB that is clearly stating that you think this is a real vid of the MIB?

The video is boring, a wasted post.

Originally posted by Slipdig1
I think this is one of the worst videos I've seen on ATS yet. The camera man never goes close enough to see who is in the van. You couldn't tell whether the occupants in the car were wearing suits. Let alone see how many are in the van, what sex they are.Nothing. Its just a video of two white vans. Isee no men in black, as I can hardly see anything, absolute waste of time.

Says oh he who promotes the kid with the blow up alien doll video which is a disgrace to ATS, and all of which have been thrown into the hoax bin or straight out 404'd

Read through the replies Slipdig, you may just learn some new information.

They look like Chevy Astro vans. I suppose an Astro would be appropriate for men in black. But they are also used by fed and state as well as utility companies quite a lot.

reply to post by FoxfilesMulder


So can you post the Mufon Article that relates to the siting of the UFO's the night before? Can you shows us any articles on it?

By the way the one thread that I posted about the kids experience was not 404'd or moved to the hoax bin immediately. There was a good discussion going on about it until you showed up with some of your buddies just causing trouble.

At least I had newspaper articles, the actual author of the vid, clear footage of what looked to be an entity.

What has this got, two white vans, claims of MIB you can't see and a heresay story from the filmer, with no articles or evidence to back it up. Just some random filming nothing saying it's something.

If you think I looked stupid for posting the thread I made and this vid is worse than that, What do you think that will make you like in the eyes of the forum?

I call for anyone who thinks this is ridiculous, to press the alert button and send this thread to the hoax bin, as it states it is evidence and it clearly is not.

Originally posted by Slipdig1
reply to post by FoxfilesMulder

 

So can you post the Mufon Article that relates to the siting of the UFO's the night before? Can you shows us any articles on it?

By the way the one thread that I posted about the kids experience was not 404'd or moved to the hoax been immediately. There was a good discussion going on about it until you showed up with some of your buddies just causing trouble.

At least I had newspaper articles, the actual author of the vid, clear footage of what looked to be an entity.

What has this got, two white vans, claims of MIB you can't see and a heresay story from the filmer, with no articles or evidence to back it up. Just some random filming nothing saying it's something.

If you think I looked stupid for posting the thread I made and this vid is worse than that, What do you think that will make you like in the eyes of the forum.

I call for anyone who thinks this is ridiculous, to press the alert button and send this thread to the hoax bin, as it states it is evidence and it clearly is not.

See foot? Take out of mouth!

I have already posted it on page 3, and you can go to the source from a few replies before that.

Here is a piece of it:

Later when I spoke with my husband and daughter I was informed it had 2 bright lights and was up in the sky they could see the back neighbors house below it and it made no sound and teetered a little back and forth but the lights were always horizontal to each other. This object made no sound what so ever and my husband said he saw the silhouette and it was as big as our back pasture across and very dark.

Anybody who knows your reputation around here knows to overlook your replies and not give them a second glance. You are a menace to the UFO forum and ATS.

I'm glad you quoted me when I said if you are calling these just white vans, then I dont care, and "you cant bring me down"

You see where there is a question mark at the end of the title of this thread? Do you know what a question mark is? It means I'm asking a question, not stating a fact.

See foot? Take out of mouth!

yeah you said you quoted something, I'm not gunna believe your says-so. I want a link not something you made look like a quote. I wanna see it for myself. You can't provide that so its utter bunk.

I don't really care for what you think of me personally and will wish you to stop attacking me personally as well. I attacked your vid because its complete rubbish, and you made a title up that so obiviously you think it could be evidence of MIB?

If you don't think its evidence why did you post it then? posting a title like that decieves people say want you want about me but your really showing your true colours now aren't you.

Originally posted by Slipdig1
yeah you said you quoted something, I'm not gunna believe your says-so. I want a link not something you made look like a quote. I wanna see it for myself. You can't provide that so its utter bunk.

I don't really care for what you think of me personally and will wish you to stop attacking me personally as well. I attacked your vid because its complete rubbish, and you made a title up that so obiviously you think it could be evidence of MIB?

If you don't think its evidence why did you post it then? posting a title like that decieves people say want you want about me but your really showing your true colours now aren't you.

Ok, l cant believe I feel the need to reply again here but anyways, I'm going to have to spell it out one last time. I hope this gets through, sheeesh!

Firstly the title:

Rare video evidence of men in black (2010) ? (QUESTION MARK)

Since there is a question mark, lets re-phrase the title to how it should read.

Is this rare video evidence of men in black.

Now what I wrote in the write up before linking the video

I saw this clip awhile back and always thought it was interesting. Claims to be two unmarked vans with men in black inside, or at least men wearing suits parked outside a home of which the occupants were witness to a UFO sighting the previous night.

Searched for it on ATS and couldn't find it so thought I would share it here and see what everybody else thought about it... I'm not convinced about the whole "men in black" story.

Technically is it considering there are men allegedly wearing dark suits inside the vans, but there seems to be something strange about it none the less. TWO vans, NO number plates.

Do you see me saying "HEY EVERYBODY, THIS IS 100% MEN IN BLACK?

Now the source which you were too lazy to click a couple buttons to see.

Mufon Case number
#24103

If you want anymore information on it, GO LOOK FOR IT YOURSELF, I'm not ya mother!

See foot? Take out of mouth.

Thankyou, goodbye.

yeah no sorry no matter how much you yell yeah thats what I see, I see you exclaiming evidence and asking us if we agree. So I think you fool.

reply to post by Slipdig1

Your title says its evidence of MIB that is clearly stating that you think this is a real vid of the MIB? The video is boring, a wasted post.

Actually, sorry, but you're wrong, this is what the subject of his thread says:

Rare video evidence of men in black (2010) ?

Clearly there is a question mark, this means it is a question, not a statement. In other words, he agrees that there is insufficient evidence to suggest that it is MIB, but he is questioning the coincidence of the matter the morning after a sighting at the house they were parked in front of together with the fact of no license plates. The fact that their dog was killed suggests that something definitely did happen there (what is up for speculation, and one can only go by reports made by the occupants of the home, but the fact that the dog is dead is physical evidence of something happened). He is questioning if the occupants of the vans really could be MIB or someone else also to do with the sighting. He is asking for opinions. That's what I read in the OP anyway. Not once did he claim that it's real. Good grief I'm not naturally born English and even I understand that that is a question not a statement.

Why are you so on the offensive? If he really was just looking for people who agree with him that it's real, then my post should have offended him as well and have him attack me too, as I too felt there's insufficient evidence to suggest that they are MIB and I said so too. He didn't attack me for that, he agreed that I have valid questions on the fact that they are M.I.B. and agreed they could be someone else also there in regards to the sighting. The question is, are they there about the sighting and they from some secret organization, or are they just cops because something happened that upset the family and had them running out of the house and this something killed their dog. He was simply questioning who would be staking the house out. If you were correct in your assumption then he would have attacked me too, as you suggest he is you because you didn't like the video. You can not deny that the situation was suspicious in the least, whether they be MIB or not.

Come on man, take a chill pill, relax, read the article, watch the video, and form a valid opinion, instead of going on the offensive, try answering his question with some valid reasons why you think what you think. That's all he asked for.

reply to post by FoxfilesMulder


Hmmm ... yes, you do have a point, it does look like there are not plates, it's just that the guy said he can't get it on the camera, which seems to suggest that with the naked eye they were there?

I don't know, what to make of it, I know what I can or can not see, but what he said contradicts that. I know with my camera, we went to the lion park a while back, there were some cheetah in behind a fence, when I tried to video it, the video kept automatically trying to focus on the fence in stead of the cheetah. I never could focus on the cheetah, hence never got the vid, it came out just a blur of a video with fencing. Maybe that's what happened here, as well? the camera kept focusing on the cars closer to the camera therefore the plates were just a blur?

Then again, maybe he couldn't see the plates, and what he meant by he couldn't get it, was that he couldn't see it? Would secret agencies use plates? At the end of the day, I guess the plates are besides the point. What is somebody doing camped out there the day after a sighting occurred and the family dog got killed? Very curious indeed.

This is interesting, like most of the comments said, the title of the thread was a question not a statement. There really isn't any tangible proof to validate this or debunk. Interesting none the less. Could be something, or it could be nothing.

Originally posted by FoxfilesMulder
reply to post by Screwed

 

I suppose you took the number plates off the van while you were sleeping also, as did your friend who decided to take a nap next to his buddy?

Depending on what state you live... it isn't always required to have plates on the front of your vehicle... just the back.

If you like men in black, then Denny's at 2AM Needles, CA and I 40.
they stop their frequently my youtube friend says. who was a waitress there.
now she is unemployed

well there is two white cars down the road from my house at the moment, and we just had UFO sightings in Marybourough and i posted that story on the web to alert the world. So they must be MIB hey? I'll just go and get my camera and catch the MIB in action as it is that easy.

Yes I know about the question mark in the title, still if he didn't think it was proof why the hell did he waste his time or others by posting it.

It is a lie that he can post a vid and not have a veiw on it and yet stick up for its legitimacy, with such conviction.

If you didn't think it was real you wouldn't care about my comments that it is fake.

reply to post by Fenix777


Yeah you brought up some great points again!

With what the guy says I'm thinking maybe he initially thought it had plates because he was looking with one eye through the video camera. I've been the director of a paranormal group since the early 90's and know you never worry about what you see through the camera at the time because its extremely easy to miss things due to the detail being minimal. Its only when you get home and upload it to a bigger screen that you begin to scan it for any phenomena.

Also, if you pause the video at 0:44 you can see a car coming up the road almost parallel next to the van and its obvious the car has a plate, where as the van seems to have nothing.

Originally posted by mwood

Not all states have a front license plate. We don't in Arizona.

[apologies if this has already been mentioned somewhere in the thread]

In California (where this video was apparently shot) you are not required to have front & rear license plates... HOWEVER,

According to state law if your [California registered] vehicle has two license plates issued to it, you must have both plates displayed on your vehicle. Since every California registered vehicle is always given two plates, it makes the no front plate required law pretty much moot...

The only reason I know about this was I had no front plate on my car and one day found a ticket on my window. I felt at the time that the only reason the law was written this way was to allow the cops to make extra $$ on those who were familiar with the first law but not the second...

Originally posted by FoxfilesMulder

That would be awesome buddy, thanks!

If the white vans are still there, tell him to walk up to the side window and take some happy snaps with his phone or something, then make a run for it.

The Video was posted on youtube July 5th 2010
Why would you think they ( the vans) would still be there
or was that a bad joke?