It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
now how can that be if STRONG said just a few pages up where that info came from? but now she doesnt? seems like someone needs to get their stories straight.
GRONLUND had stated that the terrorist had already attacked the World Trade Center WTC and they threatened to do the same type of bombing attack . STRONG stated she did not know how GRONLUND knew WTC had been attacked
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by pshea38
Still haven't explained how they got 10 minute digital recordings of everyone on that plane
Or how knew, in advance, who would be on that flight - Mark Bingham also missed it, He arrived only 5
minutes before it left, They were several more people who eitther booked flight shortly before or had
tickets on the flight and took different one.
In addition how would know personal details like Linda Gronlund tellling sister where to find her safe and the
combination
Typical delusional conspiracy fantasy......
Originally posted by Reign02
I was there and saw the 2nd plane hit with my own two eyes!!! Definatley was NOT holograph of some kind. And if it was how did they make the sound of the jet as it passed over NYC? You people amaze me at how you can create elaborate retarded conspiracy stuff....
Here is exactly what happened.....
2 planes hit the WTCs
something hit the Pentagon (plane, UAV, Cruise missle, whatever you think because if you weren't there you don't know)
GG
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
In one of the "phone calls" from one of the doomed planes the caller reaches his "mother" and asks if it is "Mrs. So and So"....how many of you address your Mother as Mrs, Last Name, You would say "Mom, is that you? This is (your name)." But if it was a 3rd party making the call with altered voice technology you might address her that way then pretend to be her son once you know that you have reached the right person (the real son would know his mother's voice unless it was a real bad connection then you might ask but you still wouldnt call her by her last name).
Originally posted by Another_Nut
reply to post by thedman
they knew who would be on the flight from the ticket sales.since most tickets are reserved you can get that list pretty quick if you have the right connections . then you call them up and have them take a quick 10 min "survey" about something .
Originally posted by Another_Nut
reply to post by Alfie1
clutching at straws? for what? i was asked how it could be done . i answered that in quick and simple way. it only took like 3 minutes to come up with that and they had longer than 3 minutes to plan it. whats your point. and your link actually makes more sense when when i think about it. all those "last minute changes" makes it easier to fake not harder . you take the voices you have on file and and book them a ticket at the last minute . that is a lot easier than calling prebooked passengers and trying to get a sample. o and about the good doctor, well if you created the tech that helped the 9/11 conspirators would you say "o yea that was me.i helped them do it." no you would not you would say just what the doc is saying.
Originally posted by Another_Nut
reply to post by Alfie1
first not all of the calls made were from those "last minute"passengers . i am looking into which ones were late comers who ALSO made calls. but just think if you were the one planting evidence. would it be easier to get the passenger list and try to get a sample from that or would it be easier to get the sample then just book those people on the flight?
Originally posted by bsbray11
I specifically remember voice morphing technology being discussed immediately around the time of 9/11. Since then I scoured Google and couldn't find a single mention of it again, until this thread just now.
Another example of information being censored if you ask me. I've seen more than a couple different articles of "interest" be sent tumbling down the Google ranks. The AP's article featuring a volunteer structural engineer who worked with FEMA at Ground Zero, and accusing the ASCE of corruption and cover-up during their investigation, went a similar route and now you can hardly find that article at all either, despite the controversy it caused at the time. The AP never followed up on the article, and neither did the ASCE or anyone else. Deafening silence follows these kinds of articles, at least from anyone of any intelligence whatsoever.
Originally posted by Alfie1
So because , for some unknown reason, you couldn't google something then it must have been censored ?
Didn't take me any time at all to find this item by Dr George Papcun, founder of voice morphing technology, saying what rubbish it is to suppose that his invention could have been used on 9/11 :-
Originally posted by Alfie1
So, are you saying you still believe 9/11 calls from the planes were faked by voice morphology ? How quaintly 2006 of you.
I am afraid you are a truther dinosaur. 9/11 blogger, which I think is the largest truther site, has turned itself completely against that. Have you seen this critique of David Griffin's nonsense ?