It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I wonder if all this testing has any effect on global cancer rates? I knew there were a lot of tests but I didn't realize it was over 2000.
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
Given the footprint that Chernobyl left, and the effect that had on Europe, even if this is AS BAD as Chernobyl, it will STILL NOT mean the end of the world
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
Folks
Please take a look at this video. It has been posted here before however this is CERTAINLY worth looking at and bearing in mind given the current level of panic going on.
Given the footprint that Chernobyl left, and the effect that had on Europe, even if this is AS BAD as Chernobyl, it will STILL NOT mean the end of the world
Sorry to disappoint
Nuclear Tests Worldwide
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
reply to post by defenestrator
I was a young boy at the time of Chernobyl.
The plume from that spread and covered all of Europe. including the UK.
Thousands of sheep were culled due to radioactive infection, to the point that affected herds in Northern Counties were not used for many years. In fact I am not even sure if they are now.
On that day, It was raining. It rained all over me in fact.
No one dropped dead, then or even shortly afterwards.
The distance from Chernobyl to the UK is a quarter of that from Japan to the Western shores of the US.
Please keep things in context, and try and understand that there are those of us who have seen this before and lived.
I understand the need to take precaution. But reactions should be tempered with fact, and clear thinking. not fueled by media speculation.
IMO these are times when thoughts of conspiracy should be put aside. And decision made based on fact. No one is doubting that the situation there is severe. However within 48 hours of this breaking, there were rumblings that this would turn the US into an uninhabited wasteland, coupled with panic buying of thyroshield, and people pleading on here for instructions on where to obtain it and how to use it.
I find that kind of unnecessary overreaction to be most distasteful, given the circumstances
edit on 17/3/2011 by JakiusFogg because: (no reason given)edit on 17/3/2011 by JakiusFogg because: (no reason given)
Large areas in Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia were evacuated, and over 336,000 people were resettled. According to official post-Soviet data, about 60% of the fallout landed in Belarus.
Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus have been burdened with the continuing and substantial decontamination and health care costs of the Chernobyl accident. More than fifty deaths are directly attributed to the accident, all among the reactor staff and emergency workers. Estimates of the total number of deaths attributable to the accident vary enormously, from possibly 4,000 to close to a million.
Another study critical of the Chernobyl Forum report was commissioned by Greenpeace, which asserts that "the most recently published figures indicate that in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine alone the accident could have resulted in an estimated 200,000 additional deaths in the period between 1990 and 2004."
A 2009 English translation of an earlier 2007 Russian language publication titled "Chernobyl" presented an analysis of scientific literature and concluded that medical records between 1986, the year of the accident, and 2004 reflect 985,000 deaths as a result of the radioactivity released. The authors suggested that most of the deaths were in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, but others were spread through the many other countries the radiation from Chernobyl struck.
After all isn't radiation only blocked by lead!!
Originally posted by JakiusFogg
.... However you don't hear so much about panicking Canadians.
How Much Spent Nuclear Fuel Does the Fukushima Daiichi Facility Hold?
• Reactor No. 1: 50 tons of nuclear fuel
• Reactor No. 2: 81 tons
• Reactor No. 3: 88 tons
• Reactor No. 4: 135 tons
• Reactor No. 5: 142 tons
• Reactor No. 6: 151 tons
• Also, a separate ground-level fuel pool contains 1,097 tons of fuel; and some 70 tons of nuclear materials are kept on the grounds in dry storage (1700 tons of spent fuel also being reported).