It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Japanese owner of the stricken Fukushima nuclear plant falsified safety data and "dishonestly" tried to cover up problems there.
Tokyo Electric Power Co injected air into the containment vessel of Fukushima reactor No 1 to artificially “lower the leak rate”. When caught, the company expressed its “sincere apologies for conducting dishonest practices”. The misconduct came to light in 2002 after whistleblowers working for General Electric, which designed the reactor, complained to the Japanese government. Another GE employee later confessed that he had falsified records of inspections of reactor No1 in 1989 - at the request of TEPCO officials. He also admitted to falsifying other inspection reports, also on request of the client. After that incident TEPCO was forced to shut down 17 reactors, albeit temporarily.
Dale Bridenbaugh, a GE employee who was not the whistleblower, resigned 35 years ago after becoming convinced that the design of the Mark 1 reactor used at Fukushima was seriously flawed. Five of the six reactors were built to that design.
Mr Bridenbaugh told ABC News: “The problems we identified in 1975 were that, in doing the design of the containment, they did not take into account the dynamic loads that could be experienced with a loss of coolant.”
While I agree the falsification of records is terrible and may lead to deaths, I have to question the rest of your assertion. How many of those 25,000 people died from the nuclear plant problems so far? None?
Originally posted by HeldHostage14
He does sound like a douche'
He just traded over 25,000 lives for money. Well we got to thank our good ol' capitalism!
Originally posted by Amaterasu
This is reassuring...not. And it does not surprise me in the least. Get rid of nuclear energy. We don't need it.
Any such dangerous activity will come round to bite us on the tail end.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Originally posted by Amaterasu
This is reassuring...not. And it does not surprise me in the least. Get rid of nuclear energy. We don't need it.
Any such dangerous activity will come round to bite us on the tail end.
Hmm, not sure I'd go that far.. With the price of raw crude slamming us, we still need those plants . Instead how about let's get rid of the people who KNOW the consequences of nuclear catastrophe, and yet who would still risk the rest of us by hiding the facts. I'm talking about these guys in the article.
My thumbs up to guy who quit over it.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Originally posted by Amaterasu
This is reassuring...not. And it does not surprise me in the least. Get rid of nuclear energy. We don't need it.
Any such dangerous activity will come round to bite us on the tail end.
Hmm, not sure I'd go that far.. With the price of raw crude slamming us, we still need those plants . Instead how about let's get rid of the people who KNOW the consequences of nuclear catastrophe, and yet who would still risk the rest of us by hiding the facts. I'm talking about these guys in the article.
My thumbs up to guy who quit over it.