It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by TrgiclyHip
My question is this. I though this comet was on a large eliptical orbit and was just discovered like 4 months ago? How could the know exactly if and when it aligned before, I understand they could use math, but down to the exact day coinciding with the earthquakes? Seems like a lot of conjecture. When did they say this comet is a yearly event?
Originally posted by dogbreath
I spent several years with the 5th Psychological Operations Group when it was at Andrews AFB outside Washington, DC. I wrote and executed PSYOP plans. I fully understand the role of "disinformation" agents. It's all about nudging public opinion in a desired direction. It is safe to say that every major country in the world (and every international organization) uses some form of PSYOP in their day-to-day operations. Although now days it's more politically correct to use the term "Public Affairs" instead of PSYOPs, the game is the same - manipulate opinion or deny knowledge. It's a legitimate question to ask about the existence of Leonid Elenin.
Originally posted by greytech
reply to post by TrgiclyHip
Hi, I did a search for Leonid Elenin on Facebook and I found him. I sent him a friend request. He seems like a real person to me. I asked him if he was the astronomer that discovered the comet and let him know that there were many people who didn't believe that he even existed. He said he had heard all the rumours and that they were not true and that his comet is NOT dangerous!!
Well, lets hope he is right! This comet is called a long-period comet that only orbits every 600,000 years or so. Apparently this comet/planet's orbit was estimated by the Ancient Sumerians to be around 500,000 years. It is also estimated that this comet is 3-4km in diameter, that can't be a very big planet/comet right?? Although.... maybe 600,000 years ago it was a huge planet but now is it smaller because it has decayed or broken up so much over the years. Oh well, I guess we will find out in Oct then!
edit on 24-3-2011 by greytech because: updated
Originally posted by TrgiclyHip
reply to post by randyvs
*CONFUSED*
Cant find anything relevant to the topic....
Originally posted by tonygal
reply to post by CosmicCitizen
Also, look at his name in Reverse!
nineledinoel
an anagram of
nine eledin ol
9 - 11 - 01
whoa
Originally posted by TrgiclyHip
reply to post by Drunkenparrot
Thank you DrunkenParrot, Your opinion is just as welcome as everyone elses in this thread, To clarify to you why I feel suspicous about Elenin-
There are 3 major earthquakes that have happened during periods when "Comet Elenin" is aligned with earth and the sun. You can see this for yourself by checking out this link (if you havent already done so) www.abovetopsecret.com...
The model program used comes from a very trustworthy source - NASA
To me, the real concern is that this may not be a comet at all, Perhaps we should be seeing how we can prove it either is or it isnt.... Then the question still remains, if it isnt a comet, what is it, OR if it is a brown dwarf, would a brown dwarf cause gravitational pull strong enough to cause earthquakes on earth?
Keeping in mind that aside from the major earthquakes we have had much more swarming activity as of late than in the past and in areas where EQ's are rare....
Which brings me back to - Does Leonid Elenin exist? or is the name a code, or is he a fabricated persona ? To many questions and not enough answers
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
reply to post by tonygal
Good eye! and ear for the phoenetics of nine eleven.
From this month we will have the complete statistics from the Minor Planet Center about all discovered or rediscovered object on the our observatory.
Detailed statistic for all (re)discovered objects on our observatory
March 12 Leonid ELEnin
Many of the readers of this blog have already seen the latest images of comet C/2010 X1. On them, the tail of the comet extends all of 1 minute of arc. Is the comet’s tail actually small or is it simply an optical illusion? For my calculations I used Gustavo Muler’s picture which he obtained March 7. Unfortunately before opposition of the comet, we were not able to get an image with any large telescopes – the camera on the two-meter Faulkes Telescope North (FTN), went off-line. As such, we’ll return to the image we have. On approach to opposition, when the comet, Earth, and Sun are lined up (that is, the C-S-E angle is close to 180°), the comet’s tail is practically hidden from view for the Earthly observer, as the tails of the comet are pointed away from the Sun. At the time the image was taken, we saw the tail at an angle of 2.75°! Taking the length of the projection of the tail as one minute of arc, and solving the triangle, we see the actual length of the tail has already exceeded 900,000 km! Although, in fact, the tail has to be still bigger, as Gustavo used a 30-cm telescope, knowing that if he had photographed the comet with a two-meter telescope, we would have seen fainter fragments of the comet’s tail. If, on March 7, we had been able to see the comet’s tail in profile, its length on the image would have been in excess of 10 arc minutes. Right now, the comet is approaching opposition, and we have a good chance of getting images of the comet’s coma. Maybe we can also do that on large telescopes.