It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If humans have stature above all other creatures, is it not our responsibility to show kindness, care and compassion to those lesser then ourselves? To speak for those with no voice, to act for those who cannot? CloudDancer Mogle (AKA LadyV)
Originally posted by Jonna
There is a big difference in killing a cow for meat and burning a kitten alive on a grill.
www.news.com.au...
Animal cruelty is a stepping stone to the abuse of larger animals: humans.
and it just not that hard to define abuse of an animal...anyone with an amount of intelligence could figure it out.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Large snakes should not be kept as pets. They are potentially dangerous. I think Pythons and anacondas and the like should be illegal. Just like having a pet tiger or pet alligator.
Thus, rats, kittens, nor rabbits should be fed to these snakes. I think whoever did this was pretty sick. Feeding a kitten?
The difference is, Cats are pets themselves, thats thier sole purpose. Rats are bred and raised for a multitude of purposes.
Hi MountainStar
Apparently there is some confusion as to my purpose to testify in Washington,
D.C. It is to assist in the passage of H.R. Bill 4264. This is to strengthen
animal fighting laws of the federal level. It is not breed specific or
anything else. It does not have anything to do with if we own a cat or dog,
only if you raise the animal or breed for fighting stock to fight the animal.
It will make animal fighting a Felony offense.
PETA IS NOT INVOLVED IN THIS BILL
Hope this clears the issue up. I might not have to be called to D.C. if there
is belief that this bill will pass with out my testimony. I had to get funding
for the possibility of the trip.
Tony DeMeo
Sheriff
108th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 4264
To amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen prohibitions against
animal fighting, and for other purposes.
To amend title 18, United States Code, to strengthen prohibitions against
animal fighting, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States
of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement of 2004'.
SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT OF ANIMAL FIGHTING PROHIBITIONS.
a) In General- Chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding
at the end the following:
`Sec. 39. Animal fighting prohibition
`(a) Sponsoring or Exhibiting an Animal in an Animal Fighting Venture-
`(1) In general- Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for
any person to knowingly sponsor or exhibit an animal in an animal fighting
venture, if any animal in the venture was moved in interstate or foreign
commerce.
`(2) Special rule for certain states- With respect to fighting ventures
involving live birds in a State where it would not be in violation of the law,
it shall be unlawful under this subsection for a person to sponsor or exhibit
a bird in the fighting venture only if the person knew that any bird in the
fighting venture was knowingly bought, sold, delivered, transported, or
received in interstate or foreign commerce for the purpose of participation in
the fighting venture.
`(b) Buying, Selling, Delivering, or Transporting Animals for Participation in
Animal Fighting Venture- It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly
sell, buy, transport, or deliver, or receive for purposes of transportation,
in interstate or foreign commerce, any dog or other animal for purposes of
having the dog or other animal participate in an animal fighting venture.
`(c) Use of Postal Service or Other Interstate Instrumentality for Promoting
Animal Fighting Venture- It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly use
the mail service of the United States Postal Service or any instrumentality of
interstate commerce for commercial speech promoting an animal fighting venture
except as performed outside the limits of the States of the United States.
`(d) Violation of State Law- Notwithstanding subsection (c), the activities
prohibited by such subsection shall be unlawful with respect to fighting
ventures involving live birds only if the fight is to take place in a State
where it would be in violation of the laws thereof.
`(e) Sharp Instruments- It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly sell,
buy, transport, or deliver in interstate or foreign commerce a knife, a gaff,
or any other sharp instrument attached, or designed or intended to be
attached, to the leg of a bird for use in an animal fighting venture.
`(f) Penalties- Any person who violates subsection (a), (b), (c), or (e) shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both,
for each such violation.
`(g) Definitions- For purposes of this section--
`(1) the term `animal fighting venture' means any event which involves a fight
between at least two animals and is conducted for purposes of sport, wagering,
or entertainment except that the term `animal fighting venture' shall not be
deemed to include any activity the primary purpose of which involves the use
of one or more animals in hunting another animal or animals, such as
waterfowl, bird, raccoon, or fox hunting;
`(2) the term `instrumentality of interstate commerce' means any written,
wire, radio, television or other form of communication in, or using a facility
of, interstate commerce;
`(3) the term `State' means any State of the United States, the District of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of
the United States; and
`(4) the term `animal' means any live bird, or any live dog or other mammal,
except man.
`(h) Conflict With State Law- The provisions of this section do not supersede
or otherwise invalidate any such State, local, or municipal legislation or
ordinance relating to animal fighting ventures except in case of a direct and
irreconcilable conflict between any requirements thereunder and this section
or any rule, regulation, or standard hereunder.'.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of contents for chapter 3 of title 18,
United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section
38 the following:
Large snakes should not be kept as pets. They are potentially dangerous
Thus, rats, kittens, nor rabbits should be fed to these snakes. I think whoever did this was pretty sick. Feeding a kitten?
I love my rats. They are extremely affectionate and intelligent. I get so tired of hearing the lame excuse of, "but that's nature" bull crap! It's nature in the wild, sure! It's survival of the fittest, the way it should be. It IS NOT nature when you put something in a cage for food that has no chance of escape! I don't think snakes should be kept as pets.
And why should they not be fed ? people eat rabbits hell for that matter people eat rats and cats.
really whats the big deal?
If it actually requires someone to come into this thread and explain to you "what's the big deal" it would be beyond you no matter what! I for one, won't waste my time to even try, it's pointless....you will never understand...you just don't have the heart to. I don't think I will be corresponding with you any longer.