It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AprilSky
reply to post by amarenell
Oh I forgot to say many of the quakes start out with what sounds like a bomb going off underground in the distance, not uncommon at all, not sure about in the sky though. We have had 6000 plus quakes here now.
Originally posted by AprilSky
reply to post by Aggie Man
Really so when you clap your hands together, one hand meeting the other with equal force ... nothing happens?
Go back to school ....
Originally posted by AprilSky
reply to post by aorAki
No, I have heard enough of their crap.
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by AprilSky
If you had come to the table with a patent for such a device, or some supporting documentation - such as an article from a peer reviewed journal that supported the potential of such a device, then the questions would be directed towards the evidence presented. As it stands you've tabled a theory and, as such, it is normal and good that people would want a description of the theorized mechanism and process of earthquake generation/control.
There is nothing wrong with tabling ideas in the manner done here. It is a great way to start dialogue and discussion. But one cannot be upset when that dialogue trends towards a discussion of the science involved in such ideas.
~Heff
Originally posted by AlexIR
reply to post by Aggie Man
School didn't stick to you right? ..
So i will give you something to think of:
We have 2 cars on a collision course. One is roling at 50mph and the other one at 55 mph. When they colide, what was the speed of the collision?
Originally posted by trailertrash
reply to post by AprilSky
You are looking at the action in reverse. The two points of diminished wave are not the origins but the terminals.
Originally posted by Aggie Man
Originally posted by AprilSky
OMG, this is not waves in water and believe me I experienced it and there was no canceling each other out, not before the whole place went crash!
A wave is a wave, regardless of the medium. The only difference is velocity. Furthermore, while experiencing it was tragic, it does not make you an expert on the subject; rather, a victim. Nonetheless, you could use a lesson in physics yourself.edit on 8-3-2011 by Aggie Man because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AprilSky
The elite have found a way of creating two earthquakes at once, this results in two sets of waves which run into each other, the point of interception will suffer devastation of a much greater scale than the size of either quake but the devastation will be very localized. This weapon was tested recently in Christchurch New Zealand.
Most of us understand the Richter scale and think the bigger the number the greater the devastation, however this is not true in all cases, these double quakes are far more devastating and when both are extremely shallow, they do enormous damage.
Images of resulting damage ...
www.stuff.co.nz...
Radar image of quake
images.smh.com.au...
The area showing the church, the central city business district is the targeted zone, see how the waves from the above radar image meet there.
www.ccel.co.nz...
Many parts of Christchurch were almost untouched which the target zone is almost totally destroyed.
edit on 8-3-2011 by AprilSky because: Messed up linksedit on 8-3-2011 by AprilSky because: double word
Mod Edit: All Caps – Please Review This Link.edit on 3/8/2011 by kinglizard because: (no reason given)