It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by D377MC
reply to post by OrionHunterX
Oh, I see...that's proof?
Originally posted by OrionHunterX
Originally posted by D377MC
reply to post by OrionHunterX
Oh, I see...that's proof?
Then what is? For crying out loud, it's a goddamn official paper written by the scientists at ISRO which you must have checked in that pdf file I posted. And that's the photograph taken by Chandrayaan's TMC (Terrain Mapping Camera).
What else is the 'proof' you need?
Originally posted by HunterKiller
Originally posted by OrionHunterX
Originally posted by D377MC
reply to post by OrionHunterX
Oh, I see...that's proof?
Then what is? For crying out loud, it's a goddamn official paper written by the scientists at ISRO which you must have checked in that pdf file I posted. And that's the photograph taken by Chandrayaan's TMC (Terrain Mapping Camera).
What else is the 'proof' you need?
Unfortunately, a lot of the skeptics on this board will not accept anything as fact unless it is right in front of them. For belief in "outlandish" things like extraterrestrial intelligence, they would need to land on Earth in their backyard, come out, play with their dogs a little bit, sit down for dinner, provide extensive astrobiological proof (say DNA sample and/or cutting off one of their appendages for scientific study), complete map of their originating home world and the trajectories used to get here, complete transfer of knowledge of their travel technology..
Only then will the skeptics MAYBE accept the fact of extraterrestrial intelligence.
Originally posted by amcdermott20
Your quoted text had nothing to do with extraterrestrials. His doubts were in the veracity of the collected data by ISRO, not the existence of ET. But, one could retort that nothing that damningly evident to the existence of ETs is known, and maybe you're just speculating.
Originally posted by Naptown317
reply to post by weedwhacker
Funny how I can buy a pocket knife for 20 bucks I can multi task with, but NASA spends hundreds of millions of dollars on satellites that cant?
Originally posted by Tahnya86
reply to post by R_Clark
did a bit of looking aroundand found a picture, nothing detailed but looks real to me, it just proves what NASA hides, look for it on google earth and i cant see it, not suprising =_=
jroberson151.wordpress.com...
Originally posted by tooo many pills
reply to post by R_Clark
Wow, that’s awesome! Thanks India!
Let's see the Chandrayaan-1 Spacecraft found ice/water on the Moon, so NASA countered by shooting a rocket to blow it up. How much you wanna bet we blow up this cavern to study it? :p
Something even more embarrassing for NASA- The cost of Chandrayaan-1 Spacecraft was only $80 million dollars! Compare that to the $424 million dollar satellite NASA just lost that was only going to study the affect of aerosols on the Earth's climate....