It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A new critique, published as a chapter in the new textbook "Calendars and Years II: Astronomy and Time in the Ancient and Medieval World" (Oxbow Books, 2010), argues that the accepted conversions of dates from Mayan to the modern calendar may be off by as much as 50 or 100 years. That would throw the supposed and overhyped 2012 apocalypse off by decades and cast into doubt the dates of historical Mayan events. (The doomsday worries are based on the fact that the Mayan calendar ends in 2012, much as our year ends on Dec. 31.)
Originally posted by Jussi
Fox News Article: 2012 Apocalypse -- Postponed
www.foxnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
A new critique, published as a chapter in the new textbook "Calendars and Years II: Astronomy and Time in the Ancient and Medieval World" (Oxbow Books, 2010), argues that the accepted conversions of dates from Mayan to the modern calendar may be off by as much as 50 or 100 years. That would throw the supposed and overhyped 2012 apocalypse off by decades and cast into doubt the dates of historical Mayan events. (The doomsday worries are based on the fact that the Mayan calendar ends in 2012, much as our year ends on Dec. 31.)
Originally posted by Aggie Man
I thought we could verify the accuracy of the Mayan Calendar and it's correlation to our current calendar because of the astronomical occurrences (i.e., lunar eclipse, solar eclipse, Venus transits, etc.). If our current interpretation of the Mayan calendar is off by 50-100 years, then why do the celestial occurrences match up with our current calendar, current celestial events and 2012 being the end of the Mayan cyclical calendar?edit on 2-3-2011 by Aggie Man because: (no reason given)