UK Policemen Submit Sighting and Photographs of Black Triangle UFO!

How anyone can believe those pictures is beyond me...

Originally posted by boondock-saint
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5edd5d0d19f6.jpg[/atsimg]

anybody see the Rewind symbol from
your CD player in that pic ???

See the pixelation issues around the object?

It is also a perfect Isosceles Triangle in both
pics. What are the odds of that happening
naturally in relation to the camera? How can it
possibly be an exact Isosceles Triangle in
2 different pics as it moved through the sky?
As it moved the angle of the craft would change.
These do not change from pic 1 to pic 2.

It's a hoax IMO

Thanks for that analysis, makes perfect sense and though the pics didn't look good to me I don't dismiss things automatically ever. I would never have thought about how odd it is they're both perfect isoceles triangles lol. Just one of those "oh, duh" things lol. You did it without ridicule too

Well , I couldnt locate the shot I was thinking of, but that could just as easily be because there are trillions of bytes of photos on google, as because the shot I was looking for is not amongst them. Seriously, its like looking for an atom in a rapidly expanding universe. But honestly, I think this is a fake, and not a great one at that.

no light on the bottom of the ufo

Looks pretty damn fake to me.

im not an expert.. just my opinion

At first glance, this looks like a bad fake (after looking at the images it does not look like a bad fake, it is well faked if it is fake). Let's check a few basics out:



Twice as large, with "nearest neighbor" interpolation/scaling (meaning the pixels are not blurred there is no false detail in the enlargement): i.imgur.com...

First off, neither object is a perfect Isosceles triangle. Actually, neither are perfect triangles. There is a slight indentation at the base of each triangle. The objects are NOT symmetrical, though they are pretty close.

The objects are also of different size and slightly different shape. The filter used in the above images is called "threshold" and it works by picking an brightness level in the image and making every pixel that is darker than that brightness totally black, and every pixel that is lighter than that brightness level totally white. This is useful for discerning the shape of an object which is blurred, but on its own doesn't tell us too much. I have used it here for the purpose of comparing these two objects.

So, conclusions? This would be an easy photoshop job, and any decent photoshopper would indeed make the triangles imperfect and of slightly different size (as they should be because the perspective changed between the photos). However, I don't see any evidence of editing besides the fact that the triangle is realllly dark and just looks similar to a pasted-in black triangle. However when we look at the threshold filters we see that it is not totally black and does indeed have a brightness gradient.

Images are not high enough resolution to say anything certain in my mind.

There is one picture of that craft in space but i can only find some UFO compilations and not the picture alone.

im calling fake because they say that pick was taken in 2010 then why is ther car form the 90's the police hear in the uk change there cars every 3 years or 80,000 miles so they dont have to mot them i will try and find the car make if some one can tell me were the police re from in the uk

Triangle sticker on a windshield or window. You move, the UFO moves.

That triangle looks almost exactly like the triangle I saw.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



But still the picutre looks kinda fakeish, but all I can say that the form and especially the fact that it was entirely black is what made a "De-Ja-Vu" after I saw that picture...

"(Editor's Note: The submitter of the following report has stated that the two photographs shown in this article are subject to the owner's copyright, and are not to be stolen or used in any means without permission.)"

www.ufocasebook.com...

So? Did you get permission?

reply to post by alienreality

The pictures look good and genuine to me, the slight soft edges of the craft match the focus of the rest of the image(s).. From just a cursory examination, these don't look like hoaxed images to me..
I want to check this out further and read their report if I can..

lol surely you can't be serious!!

obviously fake, just a picture of a copper that somebody has slapped a black triangle on...not even cleverly done, about 5 seconds in photoshop...

stu

Forensic Error Level Analysis - Image 1 - errorlevelanalysis.com...
Forensic Error Level Analysis - Image 2 - errorlevelanalysis.com...

From these image analyses we can see there are no obvious signs of editing/fakery from the error level analysis perspective. The error and compression is consistent throughout both images and in both images, the object's error levels and compression are effectively the same as the rest of the image.

This has got to be a joke right? I could draw a picture with crayon that looks more believable than this. It surprises me that this type of so called "Sighting" even gets attention. Its a black triangle. That doesn't even look 3 dimensional people!

If it didn't look so fake, I would have to say that it is obviously the cursor for the Matrix.
Must be a huge mouse that dude has.

In the 'report' the witness never mention that they got out of the car.................

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d1fe677b2158.jpg[/atsimg]

How many triangular shapes are there with these craft? This one is also taken over England, they don't really look the same, but I suppose you would have to allow for angles, but even so??.

i.dailymail.co.uk...

I'm gonna go with hoax. No, not even a hoax. Hoaxes are elaborate, and well thought out. This has obviously been dis-proven in countless ways.